Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • May 3, 1890
  • Page 1
Current:

The Freemason, May 3, 1890: Page 1

  • Back to The Freemason, May 3, 1890
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article RESULT OF THE BOYS' ELECTION. Page 1 of 1
    Article RESULT OF THE BOYS' ELECTION. Page 1 of 1
    Article RESULT OF THE GIRLS' ELECTION. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Result Of The Boys' Election.

RESULT OF THE BOYS' ELECTION .

Our anticipation that the contest at the Boys' Election on the 25 th ult . would be a keen one has been realised . Of the 59 , 651 votes issued for this particular election , 54 , 745 were accepted by the Scrutineers , the unused votes , together with the smaller

number that were rejected for some fault of omission or commission on the part of the voters , being 4906 , or about one in every 12 issued . Moreover , with the exception of No . 1 , whose friends seem to have been determined there should be no doubt

about his obtaining a place , there appears to have been a tolerably close poll , beginning with 28 47 , obtained by No . 2 , and gradually diminishing to 1905 , which were obtained for No . 30 . As to the distribution of success , London was able to carry nine out of its 17 candidates , while of the four cases in which it was

interested conjointly with one or more Provinces , two had the satisfaction of obtaining places . Of the 47 applicants from the Provinces 19 were successful , the Unsuccessful List being composed of eight London , two partly London and partly Provincial ,

and 28 Provincial . Of these , however , one London and two Provincial will have their names struck from the roll , as they will have attained the age of 11 years before the October election comes round .

The highest on the roll was a candidate from London and Middlesex , who had 177 votes in hand at starting , and for whom his friends and supporters polled a further 3077 votes , making his total 3254 . Nos . 2 and 3 were both from London , and would undoubtedly have succeeded even if not a single additional vote

had been polled for either at this election , No . 2 , who started with 2374 votes to his credit , obtaining altogether 28 47 , while No . 3 , with 2591 votes , increased them to 2700 . No . 4 , hailing from London , Kent , and Sussex , scored 26 39 , of which 1081 were brought forward from October , 188 9 ; and then followed two

more London candidates , No . 5 , with 1625 votes in hand , obtaining a further 937 , making together 2562 , while No . 6—a new case entirely—polled 2552 votes . The first purely Provincial candidate , with claims on Durham and N . and E . Yorkshire , secured the seventh place with 251 7 , of which 1990 were brought

forward , and then followed two more London cases , No . 8 , who had 1558 votes in hand , concluding the day with 2510 , and nine , who by a rare coincidence , stood No . 9 on the Approved List , obtaining 248 7 , of which 1354 were votes in hand , and 1133 were votes polled at this contest . No . 10 was one of two

candidates from Shropshire , and , having but this one chance left him , his friends made strenuous efforts to carry him in , and had the satisfaction of doing so , his final return being 2445 , of which all but 7 8 were polled on the 25 th ult . No . 11 from Surrey started with 9 61 votes and finished with a total of 2422 , one of the two

Jersey candidates with 1950 votes to the good increasing his poll to 2374 votes , being next in order , and then a seventh London candidate , who had 2326 votes in hand , and for whom his friends wisely restricted their further endeavours to polling only 11 additional votes , making together 2337 . 0 ne oi two candidates

from the District of Madras , whose name would otherwise have been struck from the list , stood 14 th with 2265 votes , of which 1680 votes were brought forward , while the second Jersey candidate increased his total from 18 31 votes to 2251 votes , and thus secured his election into the School just a short time before

completing his 1 ith year . The East Lancashire candidate , who also had no other chance left , secured the 16 th place with 2219 votes , and the Bristol one , who was in the same position as regards chances , was next with 2185 , of which only 6 9 were brought forward . The Norfolk candidate , with 1590 votes to his credit ,

polled 2178 , and was placed at No . 18 , the first of the two West Yorkshire candidates—a new case—being 19 th with 2120 votes , and then another London boy , who polled 2114 , and the Leicestershire and Rutland youngster with 2095 votes , both these being

new cases . One of three Warwickshire candidates , whose only chance this was of obtaining admission , was placed at No . 22 , his poll , made up of 4 62 votes brought forward and 1612 votes polled at this contest , being 2074 . The Northumbrian lad , who

Result Of The Boys' Election.

brought forward 1524 votes , obtained 206 7 votes , and with them the 23 rd place , and a London candidate the 24 th with 2022 votes , of which 979 were from the last October election . Hants and the Isle of Wight placed one of its two candidates at No . 25 , the total poll being 2009 votes , of which 165 were in hand when the

contest began . No . 26—a new candidate—from Cheshire , obtained 197 8 votes , and one of the two Somersetshire boys stood next with 1974 votes , of which only six were brought forward . Worcestershire and Warwickshire together obtained for their representative the 28 th place with 194 6 votes , and West

Yorkshire carried its second candidate , who was placed No . 29 , both these having a few votes in hand from the previous contest . The youth from Suffolk brought up the rear of the successful candidates , his votes brought forward being 1080 , and those polled at this election 825 . Of the 38 unsuccessful candidates ,

as many as eight obtained upwards of 1000 votes , the Lincolnshire lad being at the head of them with 1779 , of which 1307 remained over from last October , while next in order stood one of the three Cumberland and Westmorland candidates with 1768 votes . With this candidate we greatly sympathise . It was his last

chance , and it only needed 150 more votes to have secured his admission . A London candidate was at No . 33 with 16 97 votes , then one of the three Derbyshire boys with 149 8 votes , and then four , hailing from London , or with claims on London and a

Province . The last seven candidates polled under 10 votes each , among them being two from London and Somersetshire respectively , who polled each two votes . As these were both last cases , it seems to us that it was a mere farce to have sent in petitions on their behalf .

The total of the votes brought forward from October , 188 9 , was 32 , 049 , and the total of those issued for this election was 59 , 651 , amounting together to 91 , 700 . The total poll amounted to 86 , 794 , the balance or difference being , as we said at the outset , 4906 votes , which were either spoiled or unused .

Result Of The Girls' Election.

RESULT OF THE GIRLS' ELECTION .

Keener still was the election of 22 from an approved list of 43 candidates for the Girls' School at the Quarterly General Court on Saturday last . Nearly as many votes were brought forward from October last , as in the case of the Boys' Election , and more were issued for this occasion ; and as the number of

candidates was considerably smaller , there were some 30 of the children who polled from 1000 upwards . Again , 11 girls polled upwards of 3000 votes , the first on the list obtaining 3404 , while the last who succeeded polled 2795 , the difference between the highest and lowest successful being only 609 . As to the

distribution of success we find that of the 12 London candidates , seven obtained places among the elected 22 , while out of the 31 Provincial 15 were successful . The honour of heading the poll was secured by a London girl , who had 3285 votes to her credit from October last , her final poll being , as we have said , 3404 .

No . 2 , who increased her 801 in hand to 3341 , and No . 3 , starting with 86 9 votes and finishing up with 3267 votes , were also from London . The next in order from Turkey had 306 7 votes to her credit and polling 199 additional votes , compiled in all 3266 ; No . 5 , from Wiltshire , whobrought forward 3136 votes , increased

them to 3201 , while No . 6—one of four girls from Devonshirepolled 3172 , of which 2220 already stood to her credit from last October . No . 7 , from East Lancashire , raised her total of 1713 by 145 1 additional votes to 3164 , while Nos . 8 and 9 were both of them new cases from South Wales , the former from the Eastern

Division , having 3120 votes , and the latter from the Western Divsion , 3115 votes . A London girl stood next with 3014 votes , of which 215 remained over from October , 188 9 , and one of the two Durham girls was only six votes behind , her score from the

previous election being 709 and her total score 3008 . No . 12 , one of three hailing from West Yorkshire , and an entirely new case , polled 2993 votes , the Derbyshire case , with 1023 votes in hand , being next with 2977 . No . 14 , with claims on Essex and Kent , raised her total from 723 to 2957 votes , and No . 15 , London ,

“The Freemason: 1890-05-03, Page 1” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 12 May 2026, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_03051890/page/1/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
RESULT OF THE BOYS' ELECTION. Article 1
RESULT OF THE GIRLS' ELECTION. Article 1
GRAND LODGE AND GRAND FESTIVAL. Article 2
THE NEW GRAND OFFICERS. Article 3
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR GIRLS. Article 5
SUPREME GRAND CHAPTER. Article 5
THE EARL OF LATHOM, D.G.M., AND PROV. G.M. WEST LANCASHIRE. Article 6
ROYAL MASONIC INSTITUTION FOR BOYS. Article 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 9
To Correspondents. Article 9
Untitled Article 9
Masonic Notes. Article 9
Correspondence. Article 10
REVIEWS Article 10
Masonic Notes and Queries. Article 10
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 11
PROVINCIAL MEETINGS. Article 11
Royal Arch. Article 12
Mark Masonry. Article 12
Lodges and Chapters of Instruction. Article 12
Knights Templar. Article 13
Royal Ark Mariners. Article 13
Allied Masonic Degrees. Article 13
PROVINCIAL GRAND PRIORY OF LANCASHIRE. Article 13
THE SECOND ANNUAL SUPPER OF THE STAR CHAPTER OF INSTRUCTION , No. 1275. Article 14
A MASONIC CONCERT. Article 14
THE MASONS' JUBILEE, NEW YORK. Article 14
MASONIC SERVICE AT SOUTHPORT. Article 15
ANNUAL SUPPER OF THE EMBLEMATIC LODGE OF INSTRUCTION. Article 15
BRO. SPETH IN LINCOLNSHIRE. Article 15
Ireland. Article 15
THE THEATRES. Article 15
WHY ARE SO MANY Article 15
MASONIC AND GENERAL TIDINGS Article 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

4 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

19 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

12 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

5 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

5 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

6 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

7 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

6 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

7 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

3 Articles
Page 1

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Result Of The Boys' Election.

RESULT OF THE BOYS' ELECTION .

Our anticipation that the contest at the Boys' Election on the 25 th ult . would be a keen one has been realised . Of the 59 , 651 votes issued for this particular election , 54 , 745 were accepted by the Scrutineers , the unused votes , together with the smaller

number that were rejected for some fault of omission or commission on the part of the voters , being 4906 , or about one in every 12 issued . Moreover , with the exception of No . 1 , whose friends seem to have been determined there should be no doubt

about his obtaining a place , there appears to have been a tolerably close poll , beginning with 28 47 , obtained by No . 2 , and gradually diminishing to 1905 , which were obtained for No . 30 . As to the distribution of success , London was able to carry nine out of its 17 candidates , while of the four cases in which it was

interested conjointly with one or more Provinces , two had the satisfaction of obtaining places . Of the 47 applicants from the Provinces 19 were successful , the Unsuccessful List being composed of eight London , two partly London and partly Provincial ,

and 28 Provincial . Of these , however , one London and two Provincial will have their names struck from the roll , as they will have attained the age of 11 years before the October election comes round .

The highest on the roll was a candidate from London and Middlesex , who had 177 votes in hand at starting , and for whom his friends and supporters polled a further 3077 votes , making his total 3254 . Nos . 2 and 3 were both from London , and would undoubtedly have succeeded even if not a single additional vote

had been polled for either at this election , No . 2 , who started with 2374 votes to his credit , obtaining altogether 28 47 , while No . 3 , with 2591 votes , increased them to 2700 . No . 4 , hailing from London , Kent , and Sussex , scored 26 39 , of which 1081 were brought forward from October , 188 9 ; and then followed two

more London candidates , No . 5 , with 1625 votes in hand , obtaining a further 937 , making together 2562 , while No . 6—a new case entirely—polled 2552 votes . The first purely Provincial candidate , with claims on Durham and N . and E . Yorkshire , secured the seventh place with 251 7 , of which 1990 were brought

forward , and then followed two more London cases , No . 8 , who had 1558 votes in hand , concluding the day with 2510 , and nine , who by a rare coincidence , stood No . 9 on the Approved List , obtaining 248 7 , of which 1354 were votes in hand , and 1133 were votes polled at this contest . No . 10 was one of two

candidates from Shropshire , and , having but this one chance left him , his friends made strenuous efforts to carry him in , and had the satisfaction of doing so , his final return being 2445 , of which all but 7 8 were polled on the 25 th ult . No . 11 from Surrey started with 9 61 votes and finished with a total of 2422 , one of the two

Jersey candidates with 1950 votes to the good increasing his poll to 2374 votes , being next in order , and then a seventh London candidate , who had 2326 votes in hand , and for whom his friends wisely restricted their further endeavours to polling only 11 additional votes , making together 2337 . 0 ne oi two candidates

from the District of Madras , whose name would otherwise have been struck from the list , stood 14 th with 2265 votes , of which 1680 votes were brought forward , while the second Jersey candidate increased his total from 18 31 votes to 2251 votes , and thus secured his election into the School just a short time before

completing his 1 ith year . The East Lancashire candidate , who also had no other chance left , secured the 16 th place with 2219 votes , and the Bristol one , who was in the same position as regards chances , was next with 2185 , of which only 6 9 were brought forward . The Norfolk candidate , with 1590 votes to his credit ,

polled 2178 , and was placed at No . 18 , the first of the two West Yorkshire candidates—a new case—being 19 th with 2120 votes , and then another London boy , who polled 2114 , and the Leicestershire and Rutland youngster with 2095 votes , both these being

new cases . One of three Warwickshire candidates , whose only chance this was of obtaining admission , was placed at No . 22 , his poll , made up of 4 62 votes brought forward and 1612 votes polled at this contest , being 2074 . The Northumbrian lad , who

Result Of The Boys' Election.

brought forward 1524 votes , obtained 206 7 votes , and with them the 23 rd place , and a London candidate the 24 th with 2022 votes , of which 979 were from the last October election . Hants and the Isle of Wight placed one of its two candidates at No . 25 , the total poll being 2009 votes , of which 165 were in hand when the

contest began . No . 26—a new candidate—from Cheshire , obtained 197 8 votes , and one of the two Somersetshire boys stood next with 1974 votes , of which only six were brought forward . Worcestershire and Warwickshire together obtained for their representative the 28 th place with 194 6 votes , and West

Yorkshire carried its second candidate , who was placed No . 29 , both these having a few votes in hand from the previous contest . The youth from Suffolk brought up the rear of the successful candidates , his votes brought forward being 1080 , and those polled at this election 825 . Of the 38 unsuccessful candidates ,

as many as eight obtained upwards of 1000 votes , the Lincolnshire lad being at the head of them with 1779 , of which 1307 remained over from last October , while next in order stood one of the three Cumberland and Westmorland candidates with 1768 votes . With this candidate we greatly sympathise . It was his last

chance , and it only needed 150 more votes to have secured his admission . A London candidate was at No . 33 with 16 97 votes , then one of the three Derbyshire boys with 149 8 votes , and then four , hailing from London , or with claims on London and a

Province . The last seven candidates polled under 10 votes each , among them being two from London and Somersetshire respectively , who polled each two votes . As these were both last cases , it seems to us that it was a mere farce to have sent in petitions on their behalf .

The total of the votes brought forward from October , 188 9 , was 32 , 049 , and the total of those issued for this election was 59 , 651 , amounting together to 91 , 700 . The total poll amounted to 86 , 794 , the balance or difference being , as we said at the outset , 4906 votes , which were either spoiled or unused .

Result Of The Girls' Election.

RESULT OF THE GIRLS' ELECTION .

Keener still was the election of 22 from an approved list of 43 candidates for the Girls' School at the Quarterly General Court on Saturday last . Nearly as many votes were brought forward from October last , as in the case of the Boys' Election , and more were issued for this occasion ; and as the number of

candidates was considerably smaller , there were some 30 of the children who polled from 1000 upwards . Again , 11 girls polled upwards of 3000 votes , the first on the list obtaining 3404 , while the last who succeeded polled 2795 , the difference between the highest and lowest successful being only 609 . As to the

distribution of success we find that of the 12 London candidates , seven obtained places among the elected 22 , while out of the 31 Provincial 15 were successful . The honour of heading the poll was secured by a London girl , who had 3285 votes to her credit from October last , her final poll being , as we have said , 3404 .

No . 2 , who increased her 801 in hand to 3341 , and No . 3 , starting with 86 9 votes and finishing up with 3267 votes , were also from London . The next in order from Turkey had 306 7 votes to her credit and polling 199 additional votes , compiled in all 3266 ; No . 5 , from Wiltshire , whobrought forward 3136 votes , increased

them to 3201 , while No . 6—one of four girls from Devonshirepolled 3172 , of which 2220 already stood to her credit from last October . No . 7 , from East Lancashire , raised her total of 1713 by 145 1 additional votes to 3164 , while Nos . 8 and 9 were both of them new cases from South Wales , the former from the Eastern

Division , having 3120 votes , and the latter from the Western Divsion , 3115 votes . A London girl stood next with 3014 votes , of which 215 remained over from October , 188 9 , and one of the two Durham girls was only six votes behind , her score from the

previous election being 709 and her total score 3008 . No . 12 , one of three hailing from West Yorkshire , and an entirely new case , polled 2993 votes , the Derbyshire case , with 1023 votes in hand , being next with 2977 . No . 14 , with claims on Essex and Kent , raised her total from 723 to 2957 votes , and No . 15 , London ,

  • Prev page
  • You're on page1
  • 2
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2026

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy