Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Aug. 29, 1863
  • Page 9
  • GRAND LODGE.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Aug. 29, 1863: Page 9

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Aug. 29, 1863
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article GRAND LODGE. ← Page 2 of 3 →
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge.

3 . A complaint having been preferred against the W . M . of the Lodge of Temperance in the East ( No . 898 , late No . 1200 ) , for having appointed a brother to the office of Junior Warden who had not been elected a member of the lodge , the W . M . attended , pursuant to summons , and , on being questioned , admitted that the brother had never been regularly admitted as a

member , and that , nevertheless , he had made the appointment . The name of the brother had been put in the summons for joining , but no ballot had actually taken place . The board , in consequence , resolved that the appointment was null and void ; and there appearing to have been great laxity and irregularity in the pro - ceedings of the lodge generally , the board fur ther ordered that

the lodge he fined one guinea , and the W . M . was cautioned to be more observant of the laws of the Craft , with which it was Ms duty to have made himself well acquainted . The fine has been paid . 4 . A complaint was preferred by the Lodge of Benevolence against the Lodge of Unanimity ( No . 89 , late No . 106 ) , Dukenfield , for having certified that Bro . John Drury had been a regular contributing member for 29 years , whereas Grand Lodge

dues had been paid for him for 23 _ r years only . A Past Master of the lodge attended the board , and the books having been examined , the certificate was proved thereby to he incorrect ; but it appearing that no money the property of Grand Lodge had been kept back , and the brother having expressed the regret of the lodge for what had taken place , the board resolved that the

apology be accepted , but that the lodge be cautioned carefully to examine their books before giving any certificate in future . 5 . A complaint was also preferred by the Lodge of Benevolence against the Lodge of Freedom ( No . 77 , late No . 91 ) , Gravesend , for certifying that the late Bro . William Coles had been a regular contributing member for 23 J years , whereas

Grand Lodge dues had been paid for him for 211- years only . It being shown to the satisfaction of the board that Bro . Coles had actually ceased to be a member for 2 years and upwards out of the said period of 23 _ f years , and that consequently no moneys the property of Grand Lodge had been withheld , and the error in the certificate appearing to have been - unintentional , the explanation was accepted , but the lodge was cautioned to be more careful for the future .

6 . A complaint was preferred by Bro . L . J . Levisolm , of the Old Concord Lodge ( No . 172 , late Nn . 201 ) , Loudon , against the Lodge of Fidelity ( No . 230 , late No . 280 ) , Devonport , for refusing him admittance as a visitor because he objected to take an obligation that he had been regularly admitted into Masonry , was a subscribing member of his lodge , and had not been expelled from any lodge . It appeared from the explanation

furnished by the W . M . of the Lodge of Fidelity , that Bro . Levisolm not being known or vouched for had been required to pledge himself that he was the person named in the Grand Lodge certiacate which he produced , that he had not been expelled from tbe Order , and was not under Masonic censure . That this practice had been followed by the lodgo for many

years , and had never before been objected to , and from circumstances stated by the W . M . not having reference to the case in question , appeared to be very necessary as regards visitors not known or vouched for . The board , after consideration of all the circumstances of the case , resolved that the explanation was satisfactory , and commended the caution which the lodge appears

to exercise in the admission of visitors . ( Signed ) J . Li __ WE ____ r _ . EVAKS , Freemasons' Hall , 19 th August , 1863 . President . To the report is subjoined a statement of the Grand Lodge accounts at the last meeting of the Finance Committee held on

the 14 th instant , showing a balance in the hands of the Grand Treasurer of £ 1758 16 s . 9 d ., and in the hands of the Grand Secretary for petty cash £ 50 . Of these sums there belongs to the Fund of Benevolence £ 817 13 s . 7 d ., to the Fund of General Purposes £ 486 15 s ., and in the nnappropriated _ account £ 504 8 s . 2 d .

9 . THE Error-! or THE COLOSIAI , BOAED . To the United Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of England . The Colonial Board beg to report that they have received a communication from the St . George's Lodge ( No . 440 , late No . 643 ) , Montreal , complaining that the Grand Lodge of Canada

continues to prohibit lodges under its jurisdiction from holding Masonic intercourse with the members of their lodge , on the alleged ground that St . George's Lodge is working irregularly , and moreover affirming that it had once surrendered its warrant and joined the Grand Lodge of Canada . The Colonial Board find no reason for this assumption on the

part of the Grand Lodge of Canada . They have called for , and had laid before them , certified copies of the minutes of the St . George's Lodge for the year 1856 ; the minutes for the preceding year cannot be furnished , seeing that certain brethren who seceded from the lodge in 1855 carried away with them the books , jewels , and paraphernalia , which the members have

fruitlessly endeavoured to recover . The Colonial Board refer to certain facts , showing that the St . George's Lodge is in all respects perfectly regular under tbe constitution of the Grand Lodgo of England , and consequently ought to be so acknowledged by the Grand Lodge of Canada ; not only in pursuance of the conditions agreed to when that

Grand Lodge was recognized by the Grand Lodge of England , but also because the regularity of the St . George's Lodge has never been called in question by the Grand Lodge of England , to whom alone it is accountable for any of its acts , and who only has a right to call its regularity into question .

The facts to winch the Colonial Board allude are the following : —In the latter part of the year 1855 , certain brethren , belonging to lodges under the Grand Lodges of England , Scot , land , and Ireland formed themselves into what they then termed "The Independent Grand Lodge of Canada ; " they were however denounced by a large majority of the lodges in that country , then holding under the Grand Lodge of England , as

illegal , and intercourse with the brethren and lodges belonging to this self-constituted Grand Lodge was strictly forbidden . In June , 1857 , which date is important , the largest proportion o £ the lodges in Canada holding warrants from the Grand Lodge of England withdrew from their allegiance and formed themselves into a Grand Lodge , which they designated the " Ancient

Grand Lodge of Canada . " In the course of time these two bodies formed a junction and became the present Grand Lodge of Canada . Meanwhile , however , the St , George's Lodge had continued its meetings with great regularity , and its proceedings in all essentials being conducted in most orderly ancl Masonic manner , as evidenced by their minutes ; and at one of their

stated meetings , held on the 15 th April , 1856 , the Prov . G . M ., the Hon . W . Badgley , visited the lodge , and was thereupon invited to preside over the brethren then assembled . The regularity of the lodge was thus acknowledged by the only duly constituted Masonic authority at the time existing in the province of Montreal ancl William Henry . The lodge also brought to the notice

of their local chief , the said Bro . Badgley , the abstraction of their jewels , & c , by the brethren who had joined what was termed by the Canadian Masons an irregular body , namely , the so-called Independent Grand Lodge of Canada .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1863-08-29, Page 9” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 16 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_29081863/page/9/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
MASONIC SAYINGS AND DOINGS ABROAD. Article 1
MOTHER KILWINNING. Article 2
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 6
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 8
GRAND LODGE. Article 8
THE FREEMASONS' SCHOOLS. Article 10
METROPOLITAN. Article 11
PROVINCIAL. Article 12
AUSTRALIA. Article 13
WESTERN INDIA. Article 14
INDIA. Article 17
ROYAL ARCH. Article 18
MARK MASONRY. Article 18
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 18
ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED RITE. Article 18
THE WEEK. Article 18
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

5 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge.

3 . A complaint having been preferred against the W . M . of the Lodge of Temperance in the East ( No . 898 , late No . 1200 ) , for having appointed a brother to the office of Junior Warden who had not been elected a member of the lodge , the W . M . attended , pursuant to summons , and , on being questioned , admitted that the brother had never been regularly admitted as a

member , and that , nevertheless , he had made the appointment . The name of the brother had been put in the summons for joining , but no ballot had actually taken place . The board , in consequence , resolved that the appointment was null and void ; and there appearing to have been great laxity and irregularity in the pro - ceedings of the lodge generally , the board fur ther ordered that

the lodge he fined one guinea , and the W . M . was cautioned to be more observant of the laws of the Craft , with which it was Ms duty to have made himself well acquainted . The fine has been paid . 4 . A complaint was preferred by the Lodge of Benevolence against the Lodge of Unanimity ( No . 89 , late No . 106 ) , Dukenfield , for having certified that Bro . John Drury had been a regular contributing member for 29 years , whereas Grand Lodge

dues had been paid for him for 23 _ r years only . A Past Master of the lodge attended the board , and the books having been examined , the certificate was proved thereby to he incorrect ; but it appearing that no money the property of Grand Lodge had been kept back , and the brother having expressed the regret of the lodge for what had taken place , the board resolved that the

apology be accepted , but that the lodge be cautioned carefully to examine their books before giving any certificate in future . 5 . A complaint was also preferred by the Lodge of Benevolence against the Lodge of Freedom ( No . 77 , late No . 91 ) , Gravesend , for certifying that the late Bro . William Coles had been a regular contributing member for 23 J years , whereas

Grand Lodge dues had been paid for him for 211- years only . It being shown to the satisfaction of the board that Bro . Coles had actually ceased to be a member for 2 years and upwards out of the said period of 23 _ f years , and that consequently no moneys the property of Grand Lodge had been withheld , and the error in the certificate appearing to have been - unintentional , the explanation was accepted , but the lodge was cautioned to be more careful for the future .

6 . A complaint was preferred by Bro . L . J . Levisolm , of the Old Concord Lodge ( No . 172 , late Nn . 201 ) , Loudon , against the Lodge of Fidelity ( No . 230 , late No . 280 ) , Devonport , for refusing him admittance as a visitor because he objected to take an obligation that he had been regularly admitted into Masonry , was a subscribing member of his lodge , and had not been expelled from any lodge . It appeared from the explanation

furnished by the W . M . of the Lodge of Fidelity , that Bro . Levisolm not being known or vouched for had been required to pledge himself that he was the person named in the Grand Lodge certiacate which he produced , that he had not been expelled from tbe Order , and was not under Masonic censure . That this practice had been followed by the lodgo for many

years , and had never before been objected to , and from circumstances stated by the W . M . not having reference to the case in question , appeared to be very necessary as regards visitors not known or vouched for . The board , after consideration of all the circumstances of the case , resolved that the explanation was satisfactory , and commended the caution which the lodge appears

to exercise in the admission of visitors . ( Signed ) J . Li __ WE ____ r _ . EVAKS , Freemasons' Hall , 19 th August , 1863 . President . To the report is subjoined a statement of the Grand Lodge accounts at the last meeting of the Finance Committee held on

the 14 th instant , showing a balance in the hands of the Grand Treasurer of £ 1758 16 s . 9 d ., and in the hands of the Grand Secretary for petty cash £ 50 . Of these sums there belongs to the Fund of Benevolence £ 817 13 s . 7 d ., to the Fund of General Purposes £ 486 15 s ., and in the nnappropriated _ account £ 504 8 s . 2 d .

9 . THE Error-! or THE COLOSIAI , BOAED . To the United Grand Lodge of Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of England . The Colonial Board beg to report that they have received a communication from the St . George's Lodge ( No . 440 , late No . 643 ) , Montreal , complaining that the Grand Lodge of Canada

continues to prohibit lodges under its jurisdiction from holding Masonic intercourse with the members of their lodge , on the alleged ground that St . George's Lodge is working irregularly , and moreover affirming that it had once surrendered its warrant and joined the Grand Lodge of Canada . The Colonial Board find no reason for this assumption on the

part of the Grand Lodge of Canada . They have called for , and had laid before them , certified copies of the minutes of the St . George's Lodge for the year 1856 ; the minutes for the preceding year cannot be furnished , seeing that certain brethren who seceded from the lodge in 1855 carried away with them the books , jewels , and paraphernalia , which the members have

fruitlessly endeavoured to recover . The Colonial Board refer to certain facts , showing that the St . George's Lodge is in all respects perfectly regular under tbe constitution of the Grand Lodgo of England , and consequently ought to be so acknowledged by the Grand Lodge of Canada ; not only in pursuance of the conditions agreed to when that

Grand Lodge was recognized by the Grand Lodge of England , but also because the regularity of the St . George's Lodge has never been called in question by the Grand Lodge of England , to whom alone it is accountable for any of its acts , and who only has a right to call its regularity into question .

The facts to winch the Colonial Board allude are the following : —In the latter part of the year 1855 , certain brethren , belonging to lodges under the Grand Lodges of England , Scot , land , and Ireland formed themselves into what they then termed "The Independent Grand Lodge of Canada ; " they were however denounced by a large majority of the lodges in that country , then holding under the Grand Lodge of England , as

illegal , and intercourse with the brethren and lodges belonging to this self-constituted Grand Lodge was strictly forbidden . In June , 1857 , which date is important , the largest proportion o £ the lodges in Canada holding warrants from the Grand Lodge of England withdrew from their allegiance and formed themselves into a Grand Lodge , which they designated the " Ancient

Grand Lodge of Canada . " In the course of time these two bodies formed a junction and became the present Grand Lodge of Canada . Meanwhile , however , the St , George's Lodge had continued its meetings with great regularity , and its proceedings in all essentials being conducted in most orderly ancl Masonic manner , as evidenced by their minutes ; and at one of their

stated meetings , held on the 15 th April , 1856 , the Prov . G . M ., the Hon . W . Badgley , visited the lodge , and was thereupon invited to preside over the brethren then assembled . The regularity of the lodge was thus acknowledged by the only duly constituted Masonic authority at the time existing in the province of Montreal ancl William Henry . The lodge also brought to the notice

of their local chief , the said Bro . Badgley , the abstraction of their jewels , & c , by the brethren who had joined what was termed by the Canadian Masons an irregular body , namely , the so-called Independent Grand Lodge of Canada .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 8
  • You're on page9
  • 10
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy