Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Observer
  • Dec. 20, 1857
  • Page 6
  • GRAND LODGE.
Current:

The Masonic Observer, Dec. 20, 1857: Page 6

  • Back to The Masonic Observer, Dec. 20, 1857
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article GRAND LODGE. ← Page 3 of 6 →
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge.

tiitioiij and he died a broken-hearted man . If these facts had been laid before the Boai'd of Benevolence he had no doubt they would have recommended a much larger sum , and although lie ( Bro . Havers ) felt the full force of what had been said with respect to giving force to the recommendations of the Board , he yet thought G . L . would do itself credit and honour in agreeing to the amendment . W . Bro . PORTAL said he was entirely a stranger to the Board of Benevolence , but he thought that their recommendation ought to be attended to . He questioned if G . L . set aside that recommendation

whether it would not amount to a vote of censure upon the Board . ( No , no . ) Ho apprehended all the circumstances of the case had been laid before that Board , and he should pray the Brethren present to hesitate before they allowed so large an increase to be made to the recommendation of the Board , unless it could be shewn that there had been a great many facts concealed from their knowledge . If the chairman ! of the Board was present he hoped he would toll them how far that had been the case , and he also hoped the Brethren would not allow themselves to be led away in this matter .

W . Bro . KING judged from the amount recommended , as compared with that now proposed , that some of the circumstances of the case must have been omitted , and thought that it would be better that the question should be referred back to them for further consideration . W . Bro . SMITH , as Chairman of the Board of Benevolence on the evening the case was inquired into , said that he had expected that their recommendation would have been unanimously adopted . There had been at the Board a division of opinion , as some members wished to recommend a donation of £ 20 and not one of £ 30 for they

, , had , in the petition before them , been kept quite in the dark as to any peculiar circumstances , to distinguish this from any other case ; and those Brethren who recommended the petition did not attend to support it , although it had been two or three times before the Board , and this was the difficulty in sending it back to them for further consideration , for they could not secure the attendance of those Brethren who ought to attend to support the case . W . Bro . ROXBURGH , G . S ., concurred in the opinion of those who thought it the duty of G . L . to support its subordinate Boards , but

did not think that G . L . could abdicate its own power of altering their decisions upon being furnished with reasons for doing so . It had been suggested that this case should be referred back to the Board for further consideration , but that would occasion a delay of at least three months , and they knew the old adage said , that while the grass grows the stud starves . That was not a position in which to leave the widow of a Brother when they had ample evidence before them , in the personal knowledge of very many of their members , of the urgent character of the case . That distress existed was evidenced

by the recommendation of the Board , while the peculiarity of the case consisted in this , that the husband of the applicant had served the stewardship of all the Charities . He should cordially support the amendment . W . Bro . DE BERNARDY explained that it was in consequence' of the death of the M . W . of Bro . Foreman's Lodge , that the petition had not been supported by him when before the Board . Bro . Foreman had been a patron of the Charities of the Order , the father of the widow ,

and ever ready to dry the orphan ' s tear . ( Applause . ) G . L . was now asked to do towards his widow that favour which he had ever been ready to show to those who were in distress . He had done honour to the Craft , and the Craft should now prove its gratitude for his services . ( Hear , hear . ) Bro . K . BENSON , as a matter of order , wished to know if it were competent for him to move an amendment upon an amendment . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER : One amendment must be disposed of before another can be proposed . It is quite competent for any

Brother , should the present amendment be negatived , to move another upon the original resolution . W . Bro . SYMONDS remarked , that according to the Book of Constitutions , no motion for a grant of money could be made without due notice ; and he wished to know if it were competent for any Brother to move an increase upon the sum notified to them in the recommendation of the Board of Benevolence . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER considered it was . At all events , it had been constantly done ; and practice , he conceived , established the right . The amendment was then put , and carried by a large majority . The result was received with great approbation .

r-HINCE FREDERICK WILLIAM OF PRUSSIA . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER then said : Brethren , I know that it is the anxious wish of H . R . H . Prince Frederick William , of Prussia to pay the Freemasons of England every mark of esteem in his power ; and I now venture to offer to him , in the name of Grand Lodge , a copy of our Book of Constitutions .

His Lordship then placed a handsomely bound copy of the Book of Constitutions in the hands of H . R . H . CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES . W . Bro . BINCKES rose to move the non-confirmation of the minutes , so far as related to the rejection of certain portions of the report of the Colonial Board . He could have wished that no difference of opinion might have been shown on that evening , but a sense of duty compelled him to take this course ; and he onlhoped thatthroughout the

disy , cussion , there might be mutual forbearance and gentlemanly feeling . He regretted his absence at the last G . L ., when the report was brought up , a portion of which had been rejected upon two distinct grounds ; the first being , that the Board had exceeded its power—and the second , that the language of the report reflected upon the G . M . With regard to the first objection , it was desirable they should see what was the original constitution of the Colonial Board itself ; and he would refer to the resolution of Grand Lodge appointing the Colonial Boardand

, forming it upon the same basis as the Board of General Purposes . The Book of Constitutions , defining the power of the Board of General Purposes , clearly shewed that it had power to offer an opinion upon all matters brought before it when reporting upon them to Grand Lodge ; and hence , he argued , the Colonial Board had the same power . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER : Bro . Binckes , without wishing to interrupt you , I think it may greatly assist us , if you will , in the first

instance , state what your motion is . W . Bro . BIXCKES replied , that iiis motion was the non-confirmation of that portion of the minutes , which rejected a portion of the report of the Colonial Board . The M W . the GRAND MASTER here intimated , that it was the desire of H . R . H . Prince Frederick William to retire . On this announcement being made , Bro . Jennings , G . D . C ., marshalled the Grand Officers in regular orderto conduct H . R . H . from

, the Lodge . H . R . H .: Brethren , I take leave of you with regret ; and I again assure you how deeply sensible I am of the welcome I have received among you . This is the first time I have been in this house , but it shall not be the last . ( Cheers . ) I cannot express to you how much attached I am to your most respectable Order . ( Great cheers . ) H . R H . was then conducted from the Hall . The Grand Officers having returned to their proper places in the

Lodge , W . Bro . HAVERS said , he wished , before Bro . Binckes made any farther observations , to state that there was no motion for the confirmation of any minutes , relating to the rejection of the report of the Colonial Board ; and he thought the minutes , if correctly entered , would bear him out in saying so , for it had been his most earnest wish , and he had been particularly attentive in framing his motion , so that it might not give offence to any Brother . The words he had used were , that certain paragraphs of that report should be accepted ;

but he denied that he had moved for the rejection of any part of it . Bro . Biuckes ' s motion , therefore , went for the non-confirmation of a matter , which did not at all appear upon the minutes . Bro . R . BENSON did not see how Bro . Havers ' s explanation rendered the motion of Bro . Binckes unnecessary , which was the non-confirmation of that portion of the minutes , which related to the rejection of certain portions of the report of the Colonial Board . Surely , their non-acceptance meant their rejection . The M . W . the G . M . said , that as he understood Bro . Havers ' s

explanation there was on the books no mention of the rejection of any portion of the report ; all that appeared there being , that certain paragraphs had been adopted without any reference to the nonadoption of others . W . Bro . HAVERS said that such was the case . W . Bro . BINCKES . —Well , if that be so , it is the most Jesuitical piece of special pleading I ever listened to . 'Die GRAND REGISTRAR here informed Bro . Binckes that if he carried his motion it would amount to the non-confirmation of all

the minutes . W . Bro . BINCKES referred to the Freemason ' s Magazine as the authorised organ of the Grand Lodge , reading extracts from it to show that Bro . Havers had spoken in favour of the rejection of certain portions of the report of the Colonial Board . The M . W . the G M . explained that the editor of the Magazine was allowed to take notes , but Grand Lodge was not responsible for their

accuracy . W . Bro . BINCKES proceeded to say that even should his motion have the effect of rejecting all the minutes of the last meeting of G . L ., he should now persevere in it . The fault would not be his , but would attach to those wdio met him with a line of argument which he had already described as Jesuitical special pleading . He conceived that great injustice had been done the Colonial Board in the course taken

“The Masonic Observer: 1857-12-20, Page 6” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 24 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mob/issues/mob_20121857/page/6/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Untitled Article 2
Untitled Article 2
Untitled Article 3
Untitled Article 4
GRAND LODGE. Article 4
GRAND LODGE OF MARK MASTERS. Article 9
Untitled Article 10
Masonic Charities. Article 10
Colonial. Article 11
Correspondence. Article 14
Untitled Article 15
Reviews and Notices. Article 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Article 16
Untitled Article 16
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

8 Articles
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Grand Lodge.

tiitioiij and he died a broken-hearted man . If these facts had been laid before the Boai'd of Benevolence he had no doubt they would have recommended a much larger sum , and although lie ( Bro . Havers ) felt the full force of what had been said with respect to giving force to the recommendations of the Board , he yet thought G . L . would do itself credit and honour in agreeing to the amendment . W . Bro . PORTAL said he was entirely a stranger to the Board of Benevolence , but he thought that their recommendation ought to be attended to . He questioned if G . L . set aside that recommendation

whether it would not amount to a vote of censure upon the Board . ( No , no . ) Ho apprehended all the circumstances of the case had been laid before that Board , and he should pray the Brethren present to hesitate before they allowed so large an increase to be made to the recommendation of the Board , unless it could be shewn that there had been a great many facts concealed from their knowledge . If the chairman ! of the Board was present he hoped he would toll them how far that had been the case , and he also hoped the Brethren would not allow themselves to be led away in this matter .

W . Bro . KING judged from the amount recommended , as compared with that now proposed , that some of the circumstances of the case must have been omitted , and thought that it would be better that the question should be referred back to them for further consideration . W . Bro . SMITH , as Chairman of the Board of Benevolence on the evening the case was inquired into , said that he had expected that their recommendation would have been unanimously adopted . There had been at the Board a division of opinion , as some members wished to recommend a donation of £ 20 and not one of £ 30 for they

, , had , in the petition before them , been kept quite in the dark as to any peculiar circumstances , to distinguish this from any other case ; and those Brethren who recommended the petition did not attend to support it , although it had been two or three times before the Board , and this was the difficulty in sending it back to them for further consideration , for they could not secure the attendance of those Brethren who ought to attend to support the case . W . Bro . ROXBURGH , G . S ., concurred in the opinion of those who thought it the duty of G . L . to support its subordinate Boards , but

did not think that G . L . could abdicate its own power of altering their decisions upon being furnished with reasons for doing so . It had been suggested that this case should be referred back to the Board for further consideration , but that would occasion a delay of at least three months , and they knew the old adage said , that while the grass grows the stud starves . That was not a position in which to leave the widow of a Brother when they had ample evidence before them , in the personal knowledge of very many of their members , of the urgent character of the case . That distress existed was evidenced

by the recommendation of the Board , while the peculiarity of the case consisted in this , that the husband of the applicant had served the stewardship of all the Charities . He should cordially support the amendment . W . Bro . DE BERNARDY explained that it was in consequence' of the death of the M . W . of Bro . Foreman's Lodge , that the petition had not been supported by him when before the Board . Bro . Foreman had been a patron of the Charities of the Order , the father of the widow ,

and ever ready to dry the orphan ' s tear . ( Applause . ) G . L . was now asked to do towards his widow that favour which he had ever been ready to show to those who were in distress . He had done honour to the Craft , and the Craft should now prove its gratitude for his services . ( Hear , hear . ) Bro . K . BENSON , as a matter of order , wished to know if it were competent for him to move an amendment upon an amendment . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER : One amendment must be disposed of before another can be proposed . It is quite competent for any

Brother , should the present amendment be negatived , to move another upon the original resolution . W . Bro . SYMONDS remarked , that according to the Book of Constitutions , no motion for a grant of money could be made without due notice ; and he wished to know if it were competent for any Brother to move an increase upon the sum notified to them in the recommendation of the Board of Benevolence . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER considered it was . At all events , it had been constantly done ; and practice , he conceived , established the right . The amendment was then put , and carried by a large majority . The result was received with great approbation .

r-HINCE FREDERICK WILLIAM OF PRUSSIA . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER then said : Brethren , I know that it is the anxious wish of H . R . H . Prince Frederick William , of Prussia to pay the Freemasons of England every mark of esteem in his power ; and I now venture to offer to him , in the name of Grand Lodge , a copy of our Book of Constitutions .

His Lordship then placed a handsomely bound copy of the Book of Constitutions in the hands of H . R . H . CONFIRMATION OF THE MINUTES . W . Bro . BINCKES rose to move the non-confirmation of the minutes , so far as related to the rejection of certain portions of the report of the Colonial Board . He could have wished that no difference of opinion might have been shown on that evening , but a sense of duty compelled him to take this course ; and he onlhoped thatthroughout the

disy , cussion , there might be mutual forbearance and gentlemanly feeling . He regretted his absence at the last G . L ., when the report was brought up , a portion of which had been rejected upon two distinct grounds ; the first being , that the Board had exceeded its power—and the second , that the language of the report reflected upon the G . M . With regard to the first objection , it was desirable they should see what was the original constitution of the Colonial Board itself ; and he would refer to the resolution of Grand Lodge appointing the Colonial Boardand

, forming it upon the same basis as the Board of General Purposes . The Book of Constitutions , defining the power of the Board of General Purposes , clearly shewed that it had power to offer an opinion upon all matters brought before it when reporting upon them to Grand Lodge ; and hence , he argued , the Colonial Board had the same power . The M . W . the GRAND MASTER : Bro . Binckes , without wishing to interrupt you , I think it may greatly assist us , if you will , in the first

instance , state what your motion is . W . Bro . BIXCKES replied , that iiis motion was the non-confirmation of that portion of the minutes , which rejected a portion of the report of the Colonial Board . The M W . the GRAND MASTER here intimated , that it was the desire of H . R . H . Prince Frederick William to retire . On this announcement being made , Bro . Jennings , G . D . C ., marshalled the Grand Officers in regular orderto conduct H . R . H . from

, the Lodge . H . R . H .: Brethren , I take leave of you with regret ; and I again assure you how deeply sensible I am of the welcome I have received among you . This is the first time I have been in this house , but it shall not be the last . ( Cheers . ) I cannot express to you how much attached I am to your most respectable Order . ( Great cheers . ) H . R H . was then conducted from the Hall . The Grand Officers having returned to their proper places in the

Lodge , W . Bro . HAVERS said , he wished , before Bro . Binckes made any farther observations , to state that there was no motion for the confirmation of any minutes , relating to the rejection of the report of the Colonial Board ; and he thought the minutes , if correctly entered , would bear him out in saying so , for it had been his most earnest wish , and he had been particularly attentive in framing his motion , so that it might not give offence to any Brother . The words he had used were , that certain paragraphs of that report should be accepted ;

but he denied that he had moved for the rejection of any part of it . Bro . Biuckes ' s motion , therefore , went for the non-confirmation of a matter , which did not at all appear upon the minutes . Bro . R . BENSON did not see how Bro . Havers ' s explanation rendered the motion of Bro . Binckes unnecessary , which was the non-confirmation of that portion of the minutes , which related to the rejection of certain portions of the report of the Colonial Board . Surely , their non-acceptance meant their rejection . The M . W . the G . M . said , that as he understood Bro . Havers ' s

explanation there was on the books no mention of the rejection of any portion of the report ; all that appeared there being , that certain paragraphs had been adopted without any reference to the nonadoption of others . W . Bro . HAVERS said that such was the case . W . Bro . BINCKES . —Well , if that be so , it is the most Jesuitical piece of special pleading I ever listened to . 'Die GRAND REGISTRAR here informed Bro . Binckes that if he carried his motion it would amount to the non-confirmation of all

the minutes . W . Bro . BINCKES referred to the Freemason ' s Magazine as the authorised organ of the Grand Lodge , reading extracts from it to show that Bro . Havers had spoken in favour of the rejection of certain portions of the report of the Colonial Board . The M . W . the G M . explained that the editor of the Magazine was allowed to take notes , but Grand Lodge was not responsible for their

accuracy . W . Bro . BINCKES proceeded to say that even should his motion have the effect of rejecting all the minutes of the last meeting of G . L ., he should now persevere in it . The fault would not be his , but would attach to those wdio met him with a line of argument which he had already described as Jesuitical special pleading . He conceived that great injustice had been done the Colonial Board in the course taken

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 5
  • You're on page6
  • 7
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy