Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Jan. 29, 1870
  • Page 3
  • THE LODGE OF GLASGOW ST. JOHN.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Jan. 29, 1870: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Jan. 29, 1870
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article A PUBLIC ORDER OF MERIT. Page 1 of 1
    Article A PUBLIC ORDER OF MERIT. Page 1 of 1
    Article THE LODGE OF GLASGOW ST. JOHN. Page 1 of 3 →
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

A Public Order Of Merit.

A PUBLIC ORDER OF MERIT .

By LUPUS . I beg a few lines to say a word in favour of the establishment of a public Order of Merit in this country . The only decoration within reach of persons of even good social position is the Bath ,

and this is restricted to the army and the civil service . The subject has been agitated more than once , and has been as often under consideration of the government only to be abandoned . There is a hypocritical fashion in this country

of professing to deride , in civilians , those outward marks of personal worth which in all States , and at all times , have proved incentives to noble deeds , skilful enterprises , and useful inventions : and which , whether they be exemplified in the

humble Cross of Merit or the Legion of Honour of France , form alike the reward of some good , virtuous , or beneficial action . But notwithstanding this professed contempt for what they are pleased to call " playthings " ( the first Napoleon

said , " playthings , if you like , but suppose the people like them ? " ) I venture to assert that there is no greater desire in any country under the sun , to possess these marks of honourable distinction , than in our own fair land . Nearly every

State , great and small , in Europe , has its cross , or decoration , of merit , open to literary genius , inventive skill , or other talent of all classes . Why then should England stand alone ; not only refusing to give , but declining permission to

. The learned and accomplished antiquai'y , Nicholas Carlisle , wrote in 1839 , " I may safely predict that the institution of a civil Order , would obtain the unanimous approbation of the Bz-itish people , and that every national expression of

gratitude would be offered at the foot of the Throne , for such an act of wise and liberal policy , an act the more auspicious , as gracefully marking the commencement of the reign of a young and lovely Queen . "

Is it not much to be regretted that Carlisle ' s prediction should have had no opportunity of fulfilment ? Blanchard Jerrold , in his excellent little " Story of the Legion of Honour , " says , " We want an

Order of Merit in England , because we want to see a state recognition of hundreds of men who have never received the least token of public gratitude . A few men of genius—who happened

A Public Order Of Merit.

to be men of fortune—have received titles ; a scientific authority has even been rewarded by an inferior place at court ; but the state has in no way properly recognised the valour by which it ha & maintained its reputation , nor the genius which

has shed a marvellous light upon the livinggenerations . " I feel that I am occupying too much space , let me therefore conclude in the words of an eloquent friend of my own , when he says that such honours

should be assigned " not only to the learned historian , the erudite philologist , the accomplished linguist , the profound natural philosopher , the refined poet , but to the professors or representatives of the kindred arts , to the skilful painter ,

the expert engraver , the talented sculptor , the able musician , the ingenious mechanist , the deserving discoverer or inventor , or , in brief , to the whole united body of eminent civilians who have most conspicuously devoted their gifts and energies to the welfare and enjoyment of their fellow-men . "

The Lodge Of Glasgow St. John.

THE LODGE OF GLASGOW ST . JOHN .

By Bro . W . P . BUCHAN , P . S . W . NO . 3 bis , and ' Grand Steward , Grand Lodge of Scotland . { No 6 , Continued from Page 44 ) Ou 27 th Dec . 1852 . Election of Office ^ Bearers , Bro . Robert Craig , R . W . M .

On 27 th January , 1853 . A meeting was held where 13 brethren passed the chair as " Chair Masters . " Bro . Rev . Doctor John Graham was made an honorary member . On 3 rd March , 1853 , " The lodge agree , and

authorise the secretary to order a copy of the FEEEMASON ' S QUAETEELY REVIEW AND MAGAZIHI for the use of the lodge . " " On 17 th March , 1853 . Agreed to give Bro-Pollock , Tyler , 3 s ., for each candidate initiated .

On 8 th December , 1853 . "Agree that the Architectural Institute shall be allowed the use erf the lodge room for four nights in the year , on the understanding that a weeks' previous no ticsshall be given .

An entry occurs here of £ 12 10 s . that was collected for Dr . Rattray ' s funeral expenses , & c . On 27 th December , 1853 . Election and festival . Bro . David Manwell , R . W . M . On 22 nd March , 1854 . David Manwell , his J . W . and two others were made Chair Mas onSj after which Bro . Dunett gave a lecture .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1870-01-29, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 23 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_29011870/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
THE TEMPLARS AND FREEMASONRY. Article 1
A PUBLIC ORDER OF MERIT. Article 3
THE LODGE OF GLASGOW ST. JOHN. Article 3
Untitled Article 5
HOW I SPENT MY FIVE WEEKS' LEAVE. Article 6
MASONIC JOTTINGS.—No. 5. Article 8
THE RISE AND PURPOSES OF SPECULATIVE MASONRY. Article 8
THE ORIGIN OF THE LODGE ST. AYLES EAST ANSTRUTHER. Article 9
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 9
SPECULATIVE FREEMASONRY AND ITS ORIGIN (pp. 67, 69.) Article 10
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 11
Untitled Article 14
MASONIC MEMS. Article 14
ROYAL MASONIC BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION FOR AGED FREEMASONS AND THEIR WIDOWS. Article 14
Craft Masonry. Article 14
PROVINCIAL. Article 15
MALTA. Article 18
ROYAL ARCH. Article 19
REVIEWS Article 19
PROFESSOR ANDERSON AND THE FREEMASONS OF DUNDEE. Article 19
LIST OF LODGE, MEETINGS, &c., FOR WEEK ENDING 5TH FEBRUARY, 1870. Article 20
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

4 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

3 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

2 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

5 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

A Public Order Of Merit.

A PUBLIC ORDER OF MERIT .

By LUPUS . I beg a few lines to say a word in favour of the establishment of a public Order of Merit in this country . The only decoration within reach of persons of even good social position is the Bath ,

and this is restricted to the army and the civil service . The subject has been agitated more than once , and has been as often under consideration of the government only to be abandoned . There is a hypocritical fashion in this country

of professing to deride , in civilians , those outward marks of personal worth which in all States , and at all times , have proved incentives to noble deeds , skilful enterprises , and useful inventions : and which , whether they be exemplified in the

humble Cross of Merit or the Legion of Honour of France , form alike the reward of some good , virtuous , or beneficial action . But notwithstanding this professed contempt for what they are pleased to call " playthings " ( the first Napoleon

said , " playthings , if you like , but suppose the people like them ? " ) I venture to assert that there is no greater desire in any country under the sun , to possess these marks of honourable distinction , than in our own fair land . Nearly every

State , great and small , in Europe , has its cross , or decoration , of merit , open to literary genius , inventive skill , or other talent of all classes . Why then should England stand alone ; not only refusing to give , but declining permission to

. The learned and accomplished antiquai'y , Nicholas Carlisle , wrote in 1839 , " I may safely predict that the institution of a civil Order , would obtain the unanimous approbation of the Bz-itish people , and that every national expression of

gratitude would be offered at the foot of the Throne , for such an act of wise and liberal policy , an act the more auspicious , as gracefully marking the commencement of the reign of a young and lovely Queen . "

Is it not much to be regretted that Carlisle ' s prediction should have had no opportunity of fulfilment ? Blanchard Jerrold , in his excellent little " Story of the Legion of Honour , " says , " We want an

Order of Merit in England , because we want to see a state recognition of hundreds of men who have never received the least token of public gratitude . A few men of genius—who happened

A Public Order Of Merit.

to be men of fortune—have received titles ; a scientific authority has even been rewarded by an inferior place at court ; but the state has in no way properly recognised the valour by which it ha & maintained its reputation , nor the genius which

has shed a marvellous light upon the livinggenerations . " I feel that I am occupying too much space , let me therefore conclude in the words of an eloquent friend of my own , when he says that such honours

should be assigned " not only to the learned historian , the erudite philologist , the accomplished linguist , the profound natural philosopher , the refined poet , but to the professors or representatives of the kindred arts , to the skilful painter ,

the expert engraver , the talented sculptor , the able musician , the ingenious mechanist , the deserving discoverer or inventor , or , in brief , to the whole united body of eminent civilians who have most conspicuously devoted their gifts and energies to the welfare and enjoyment of their fellow-men . "

The Lodge Of Glasgow St. John.

THE LODGE OF GLASGOW ST . JOHN .

By Bro . W . P . BUCHAN , P . S . W . NO . 3 bis , and ' Grand Steward , Grand Lodge of Scotland . { No 6 , Continued from Page 44 ) Ou 27 th Dec . 1852 . Election of Office ^ Bearers , Bro . Robert Craig , R . W . M .

On 27 th January , 1853 . A meeting was held where 13 brethren passed the chair as " Chair Masters . " Bro . Rev . Doctor John Graham was made an honorary member . On 3 rd March , 1853 , " The lodge agree , and

authorise the secretary to order a copy of the FEEEMASON ' S QUAETEELY REVIEW AND MAGAZIHI for the use of the lodge . " " On 17 th March , 1853 . Agreed to give Bro-Pollock , Tyler , 3 s ., for each candidate initiated .

On 8 th December , 1853 . "Agree that the Architectural Institute shall be allowed the use erf the lodge room for four nights in the year , on the understanding that a weeks' previous no ticsshall be given .

An entry occurs here of £ 12 10 s . that was collected for Dr . Rattray ' s funeral expenses , & c . On 27 th December , 1853 . Election and festival . Bro . David Manwell , R . W . M . On 22 nd March , 1854 . David Manwell , his J . W . and two others were made Chair Mas onSj after which Bro . Dunett gave a lecture .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy