Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • Oct. 25, 1862
  • Page 5
  • BRITISH ACHITECTS.—NEW MATERIALS FOR THEIR LIVES.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Oct. 25, 1862: Page 5

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, Oct. 25, 1862
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article BRITISH ACHITECTS.—NEW MATERIALS FOR THEIR LIVES. ← Page 3 of 3
    Article THE QUEEN'S CROSS, NORTHAMPTON* Page 1 of 4 →
Page 5

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

British Achitects.—New Materials For Their Lives.

of stripping a bequest , and in such a season of sightseeing , of much of its value , holds out little temptation to other would-be benefactors . With equal propriety Lords Westminster and Charlemont might have been compulsorily required to lend their Hugarths to the South Kensington caterers ; or the Soane trustees may eA en now , on such a precedent , be called upon to

send the Belzoni Soane Sarcophagus to the trustees of the British Museum : from Lincoln ' s-inn-fields to Bloomsbury is not very far . Happily , how to get the jgarcophagus out of Soane ' s house into the street , without pulling the house half clown , is indeed a difficulty , and Avould form a fitting subject for a paper to he read at the next meeting of the Eoyal Institute of British Architects . PETER CUK ' K'IN & IIAM ..

The Queen's Cross, Northampton*

THE QUEEN'S CROSS , NORTHAMPTON *

It is pleasing to be able to record that , with the revival of Gothic architecture in our country , a great and manifest improvement has taken place Avith respect to memorials of the dead . Many are now to be found , not only chaste and appropriate iu design , but Ohristian-like in character . This , I think , is especially true with reference to memorial Avindows of which are trul

, many y beautiful and expressive , and eminently calculated to improve the taste and , Avhat is of far higher importance , to aid in the cultivation of the moral ancl religious feelings of the people . I might cite many examples of the former also , in proof of my opinion , but will content myself with one . What can be more beautiful , what more appropriate , than the exquisite monument by Mr . Scott

G . G . , reared in the heart of that city , for ages renowned as the seat of learning aud piety ? I allude , of course , to the memorial of those great and noble men Avhose names have long since been added to the vast catalogue of that noble army of martyrs Avho UOAV swell the chorus , " We praise Thee , 0 God . " Be this , however , as it may , I think it cannot be disputed that the

monument to which I have the honour of calling your attention to-day is one of ihe most chaste , graceful , elaborate , and , withal , beautifully appropriate specimens of memorials of the dead to be found in the United

Kingdom , or any other part of the Avorld . Its appropriate , beauty as a work of art is rendered more sublimely beautiful from the recollection that it stands on the Avayside hill , not only as a memorial of one Avho is no more , but , at the same time , a visible and tangible manifestation of conjugal affection . It is not my business to indulge in the sentimental ;

neither have I the time , if I had the inclination , to give you the history of memorial crosses in general , or of the Queen ' s Cross in particular . The history of the latter has been ably written by the Rev . 0 . H . Hartshorne , Mr . Britton , ancl others : and , as most of yon , no doubt , are as well or better acquainted with these than myself , I shall refrain from attempting the historical , and confine

myself to a description of a few particulars arising out of a discussion Avhich took place on the occasion of the late visit of the British Archaeological Association to our town a few Aveeks ago . In consequenceof that discussion I have been induced , ivith the assistance of my sons and Mr . Irvine , the able clerk of the works at StSepulchre ' sto make lans

. , p , elevations , and detail drawings of the Queen's Gross , from actual admeasurement . The plans and elevations are drawn to a scale of one inch to the foot , and most of the detail tho full size of the original . I may perhaps be induced to publish these draAvings ; but , whether or

not , I intend to present copies of them to our Architectural Society if the committee Avill do me tho honour of accepting them ; ancl I shall do so Avith the fullest assurance that , being in possession of such a society , they will become a guarantee that in any future restoration of this beautiful memorial no deterioration Avill be allowed to occur , other thau that which may already

exist . It will perhaps be as gratifying to most of those whom I have the honour to address as it is to myself , to learn that the several restorations of Queen ' s Cross have been carried out in a faithful and judicious manner . After the most careful examination , Ave have arrived at the conclusion that no material alteration of the general character

of the structure , or of the detail connected therewith , has eA'er taken place . Indeed , so carefully , perfectly , and , upon the whole , so faithfully have the restorations been executed , that , had it not been for the varieties of stone used in the several restorations , it would have been difficult to ascertain precisely where some had been effected . Moreover , our examination has ascertained the fact that

there is so much of every part of the original still remaining , that a structure exactly like the original might be made from these remnants . The drawings now before you , even of the most minute detail , have been made from portions of the original masonry . With your permission , I will UOAV proceed to the discussion to Avhich I have referred , ancl which will form the

basis of the residue of my remarks . In consequence of the sweeping assertions of Mr . Roberts , the architect , on the occasion of the meeting of the Archaeological Association at Northampton , I was induced to address a letter to our localjournals somewhat in opposition to these assertions , and I must confess that I was highly amused Avith Mr . Robert ' s reply . It was kind and gentlemanly , it is true ; but , instead of meeting my observations by argument and facts , he says , " Fancy the outcry that would be made if our favourite

Titians , Raffaelles , Hogarths , and Turners ivere to have each a few square feet cut out , and replaced with new canvass and copies of the original . " No doubt there would be an outcry , and very properly so to ; aud I should be one of the first to join in the chorus ; but there is no parallel in the illustration in the case before us . Who Avould be such a barbarian , I had almost said

barbarian and idiot , as to cut out a few square feet either from a picture or statue , or even from a stone monument , for the sake of putting it in again ? But I ask Mr . Roberts , that if he possessed a " real Titian , Raffaelle , or Hogarth , " and by accident , or by the effect of the ruthless hand of time , a rent or some other damage occurred to the icturewhether he Avould not

p , hail with delight aud satisfaction the artist who should , by great skill and judgment , restore the defect , while leaving the residue of the original untouched and uninjured in all its original beauty aud purity ? I am fond and proud of the glorious works of our forefathers in every department of art , and am prepared to venerate them ; but I am free to confess that I am

not so antiquated iu my fondness , pride , ancl veneration , as to allow them to become defunct rather than lend a helping-hand towards their proper and legitimate preservation . I have said that , in my opinion , the restorations at Queen ' s Cross have , upon the whole , been carefully and faithfully executed ; ancl , with all due deference to Mr .

Roberts , who says that no precedent could bo found for one title of the last restorations carried out by Mr . Blore , I still maintain it . One of the most extensive restorations , I apprehend , took place in the year 1713 , in the reign of Queen Anne , as witness the Latin inscription upon a tablet placed upon the cross at that time , a translation of which is as follows : — " For the perpetual commemoration of conjugal affection the honourable assembly of magistrates or justices of the county of Northampton resolved to

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1862-10-25, Page 5” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 9 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_25101862/page/5/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
MY STARS AND GARTERS. Article 1
OUR MASONIC CONTEMPORARIES. Article 1
BRITISH ACHITECTS.—NEW MATERIALS FOR THEIR LIVES. Article 3
THE QUEEN'S CROSS, NORTHAMPTON* Article 5
PARIS OF TO-DAY. Article 8
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 9
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 10
THE QUESTION OF CERTIFICATES. Article 10
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 12
METROPOLITAN. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 13
AUSTRALIA. Article 14
ROYAL ARCH. Article 16
ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED RITE. Article 16
MARK MASONRY. Article 17
Poetry. Article 18
Obituary. Article 18
THE WEEK. Article 18
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

3 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

3 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

3 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

3 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 5

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

British Achitects.—New Materials For Their Lives.

of stripping a bequest , and in such a season of sightseeing , of much of its value , holds out little temptation to other would-be benefactors . With equal propriety Lords Westminster and Charlemont might have been compulsorily required to lend their Hugarths to the South Kensington caterers ; or the Soane trustees may eA en now , on such a precedent , be called upon to

send the Belzoni Soane Sarcophagus to the trustees of the British Museum : from Lincoln ' s-inn-fields to Bloomsbury is not very far . Happily , how to get the jgarcophagus out of Soane ' s house into the street , without pulling the house half clown , is indeed a difficulty , and Avould form a fitting subject for a paper to he read at the next meeting of the Eoyal Institute of British Architects . PETER CUK ' K'IN & IIAM ..

The Queen's Cross, Northampton*

THE QUEEN'S CROSS , NORTHAMPTON *

It is pleasing to be able to record that , with the revival of Gothic architecture in our country , a great and manifest improvement has taken place Avith respect to memorials of the dead . Many are now to be found , not only chaste and appropriate iu design , but Ohristian-like in character . This , I think , is especially true with reference to memorial Avindows of which are trul

, many y beautiful and expressive , and eminently calculated to improve the taste and , Avhat is of far higher importance , to aid in the cultivation of the moral ancl religious feelings of the people . I might cite many examples of the former also , in proof of my opinion , but will content myself with one . What can be more beautiful , what more appropriate , than the exquisite monument by Mr . Scott

G . G . , reared in the heart of that city , for ages renowned as the seat of learning aud piety ? I allude , of course , to the memorial of those great and noble men Avhose names have long since been added to the vast catalogue of that noble army of martyrs Avho UOAV swell the chorus , " We praise Thee , 0 God . " Be this , however , as it may , I think it cannot be disputed that the

monument to which I have the honour of calling your attention to-day is one of ihe most chaste , graceful , elaborate , and , withal , beautifully appropriate specimens of memorials of the dead to be found in the United

Kingdom , or any other part of the Avorld . Its appropriate , beauty as a work of art is rendered more sublimely beautiful from the recollection that it stands on the Avayside hill , not only as a memorial of one Avho is no more , but , at the same time , a visible and tangible manifestation of conjugal affection . It is not my business to indulge in the sentimental ;

neither have I the time , if I had the inclination , to give you the history of memorial crosses in general , or of the Queen ' s Cross in particular . The history of the latter has been ably written by the Rev . 0 . H . Hartshorne , Mr . Britton , ancl others : and , as most of yon , no doubt , are as well or better acquainted with these than myself , I shall refrain from attempting the historical , and confine

myself to a description of a few particulars arising out of a discussion Avhich took place on the occasion of the late visit of the British Archaeological Association to our town a few Aveeks ago . In consequenceof that discussion I have been induced , ivith the assistance of my sons and Mr . Irvine , the able clerk of the works at StSepulchre ' sto make lans

. , p , elevations , and detail drawings of the Queen's Gross , from actual admeasurement . The plans and elevations are drawn to a scale of one inch to the foot , and most of the detail tho full size of the original . I may perhaps be induced to publish these draAvings ; but , whether or

not , I intend to present copies of them to our Architectural Society if the committee Avill do me tho honour of accepting them ; ancl I shall do so Avith the fullest assurance that , being in possession of such a society , they will become a guarantee that in any future restoration of this beautiful memorial no deterioration Avill be allowed to occur , other thau that which may already

exist . It will perhaps be as gratifying to most of those whom I have the honour to address as it is to myself , to learn that the several restorations of Queen ' s Cross have been carried out in a faithful and judicious manner . After the most careful examination , Ave have arrived at the conclusion that no material alteration of the general character

of the structure , or of the detail connected therewith , has eA'er taken place . Indeed , so carefully , perfectly , and , upon the whole , so faithfully have the restorations been executed , that , had it not been for the varieties of stone used in the several restorations , it would have been difficult to ascertain precisely where some had been effected . Moreover , our examination has ascertained the fact that

there is so much of every part of the original still remaining , that a structure exactly like the original might be made from these remnants . The drawings now before you , even of the most minute detail , have been made from portions of the original masonry . With your permission , I will UOAV proceed to the discussion to Avhich I have referred , ancl which will form the

basis of the residue of my remarks . In consequence of the sweeping assertions of Mr . Roberts , the architect , on the occasion of the meeting of the Archaeological Association at Northampton , I was induced to address a letter to our localjournals somewhat in opposition to these assertions , and I must confess that I was highly amused Avith Mr . Robert ' s reply . It was kind and gentlemanly , it is true ; but , instead of meeting my observations by argument and facts , he says , " Fancy the outcry that would be made if our favourite

Titians , Raffaelles , Hogarths , and Turners ivere to have each a few square feet cut out , and replaced with new canvass and copies of the original . " No doubt there would be an outcry , and very properly so to ; aud I should be one of the first to join in the chorus ; but there is no parallel in the illustration in the case before us . Who Avould be such a barbarian , I had almost said

barbarian and idiot , as to cut out a few square feet either from a picture or statue , or even from a stone monument , for the sake of putting it in again ? But I ask Mr . Roberts , that if he possessed a " real Titian , Raffaelle , or Hogarth , " and by accident , or by the effect of the ruthless hand of time , a rent or some other damage occurred to the icturewhether he Avould not

p , hail with delight aud satisfaction the artist who should , by great skill and judgment , restore the defect , while leaving the residue of the original untouched and uninjured in all its original beauty aud purity ? I am fond and proud of the glorious works of our forefathers in every department of art , and am prepared to venerate them ; but I am free to confess that I am

not so antiquated iu my fondness , pride , ancl veneration , as to allow them to become defunct rather than lend a helping-hand towards their proper and legitimate preservation . I have said that , in my opinion , the restorations at Queen ' s Cross have , upon the whole , been carefully and faithfully executed ; ancl , with all due deference to Mr .

Roberts , who says that no precedent could bo found for one title of the last restorations carried out by Mr . Blore , I still maintain it . One of the most extensive restorations , I apprehend , took place in the year 1713 , in the reign of Queen Anne , as witness the Latin inscription upon a tablet placed upon the cross at that time , a translation of which is as follows : — " For the perpetual commemoration of conjugal affection the honourable assembly of magistrates or justices of the county of Northampton resolved to

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 4
  • You're on page5
  • 6
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy