Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • May 18, 1867
  • Page 18
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, May 18, 1867: Page 18

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, May 18, 1867
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE WEEK. ← Page 2 of 4 →
Page 18

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Week.

Majesty and their Royal Highnossos Princess Louise , Pnnco Leopold , and Princess Beatrice . Tho Quoon and Princess Boatrico rodo on ponies in tho grounds on tho morning of tho 13 th inst . The Queen drovo out in tho afternoon , accompanied by Princess Lom ' so , and her Majesty walked in tho grounds on tho morning of tho 14 th hist , with Princo Leopold . Tho Qnoon drovo out iu the afternoon , accompanied hy Princess Louiso , and attended hy

the Hon . Mrs . Gordon ; and her Majesty walked and drovo in tho grounds on tho morning of tho loth inst . with Princess Louiso . IJIPEHIAIJ PAELIAMTENT . —In the HOUSE OE LOBDS on the 9 th inst ., in reply to Earl Russell , Lord Derby announced that at the sitting of the Conference an understanding was come to . His lordship declined to be very explicit on the matter pending

the arrangement of details . He said enough , however , to show that the fortress of Luxemburg is to bo evacuated by the Prussians , and the Grand Duchy neutralised under the guarantee of the Great Powers . This , he said , was simply such an alteration of the treaty of 1839 as the exclusion of the Grand Duchy from the Germanic Confederation made necessary .

On the 10 th inst ., the Marquis of Clanricarde wished to call attention to the Fenian trials now going on in Dublin . He urged very strongly that the Government should supply authentic reports of the whole of the proceedings . The Earl of Derby gave no satisfactory reply . In effect he declined to produce the reports which the Government had

received in reference to Fenianism . Tlie Earl of Derby gave to tho Houso on tho 13 th inst . a full account of tho result of tho labours of tho London Conference , whilo tho Houso of Commons had to bo satisfied with tho bare announcement by Lord Stanley that tho Conference had concluded its labours , and that as soon as possible tho papers would bo laid npon tho table . According to tho statcmont made to tho Poors ,

Lusomburg is to ho separated from tho Germanic Confederation . Tho fortress is to ho dismantled to such an extent as will satisfy tho King of Holland , and tho Duchy placed under tho collective guarantee of tho Groat Powers . Prussia , of course , withdraws her forces , and Limburg is placed wholly under tho sovereignty of tho King of Holland . In explanation to Lord Stanley of Aldorley , tho Premier stated that tho guarantee was not joint

and separate , but a collective ono . Tho interpretation to bo put upon this is , wo presume , that in case tho neutrality of Luxemburg should bo broken , England alone could not bo called upon to interfere . — Subsequently tho Houso wont into committee on tho bill for tho incre . iso of tho episcopate . Several clauses woro agreed to and amendments inserted , and

tho further consideration of tho bill was postponed . There was a warm and long discussion on tbe 14 th inst . in reference to the ritualistic practices now so much in vogue in certain of the Church of England places of worship . Tbe Earl of Shaftesbury moved the second reading of the Clerical A estments Bill , the object of which is to declare what vestments are

and what vestments are not legal . The noble earl went into a lengthy review of the whole question , and insisted that something must he done to put down ritualism . Tho Archbishop of Canterbury advocated delay until the royal commission should have xeported . As the Earl of Shaftesbury declined to accede to this suggestion , his Grace moved that the debate be

adjourned for tiro months . In the discussion which followed , several bishops and lay peers took part . Eventually the motion for adjournment was carried hy 81 to 48 votes . In the HOUSE OE COMMONS , on the 9 th inst ., the troubles present and prospective of the compound householder were the chief topic of the debate when the House got into committee on the Reform Bill . Mr . Mill made a most lucid speech against tho mendinents proposed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer

General Peel denounced tbe whole scheme . Mr . Gladstone spoke at some length , condemning the tendency of the policy pursued by the Government in respect of the measure . Subsequently Mr . Lowe and Mr . Bright made speeches . Tbe debate altogether was most interesting . ——Ou the lOth inst . owing to the withdrawal by Sir J . Pakington

of his proposal to take votes on the army estimates , the House had a very short sitting . None of the motions of which notice had been given came on . Mr . Bright having asked a question as to the Meetings in Parks Bill , the Chancellor of the Exchequer answered that notice would be given when the bill would come on . The Scotch Reform Bill would be taken first

on the 13 th inst ., aud after that the English Reform Bill . The House rose by a quarter past five o ' clock . On the 15 th inst . the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced to the House the resignation of Mr . AValpole , intimating that he would continue to have a seat in the Cabinet without holding office . Mr . Disraeli passed a high eulogium on the late Home Secretary .

Several members were anxious to know what was to be done with respect to the Meetings in Parks Bill , hut the Chancellor of the Exchequer declined to give any information . AVhen the successor to Mr . A \ alpole was in his place , he would state the course that would he taken . —The Chancellor of the Exchequer then asked leave to introduce the Scotch Reform Bill , the

provisions of which he very briefly described . The borough suffrage is to be virtually a £ i rental ; the country franchise a £ 15 occupation , with no change in the property franchise . Seven new members are to be given to Scotland . Of these one is to be given to Glasgow , which is to be divided into two boroughs for parliamentary r _ UI'Poses ' One member is to be given to the Universities of Edinburgh and St . Andrew's jointly , and oue to the Universities of

Glasgow and Aberdeen jointly . Lanarkshire , Ayrshire , and Aberdeenshire are to be divided , and an additional member given to each . The seventh member goes to a new group of boroughs . The proposal of the Government was criticised by several Scotch members , most of whom approved of the borough suffrage proposed , hut altogether opposed the distribution of seats part of the bill . Mr . Gladstone , in criticising the bill , declared that it

was the strongest condemnation of the English hill . Mr . Disraeli replied , and having been pressed to say where the seven new members for Scotland were to come from , intimated that tbey were to be a clear addition to the number of members in . the House . Leave was given to bring iu the bill , which was introduced and read a first time . —The House then went into

committee on the English Reform Bill . Alter some discussion ,, words were inserted at the instance of the Chancellor of the Exchequer , with a view of carrying out the policy as to compound householders for which the Government have obtained the support of the House . Later the question of the lodger franchise was again raised . Lord Stanley , on the

14 th inst ., was questioned in reference to the Abyssinian prisoners . His lordship had no good news . In effect his statement was that the king refused to release the prisoners . — Colonel Barttelot moved for a select committee to inquire into the operation of the malt tax , and forthwith the House went into a long discussion on the subject . The Government ,

however , made no opposition to the motion , and it was agreed to . — Subsequently Mr . Fawcett , in an able speech , moved for leave to bring in a hill to compel the education of children under thirteen years of age in the agricultural districts . Mr . Fawcett proposes to apply to these children provisions not unlike those contained in the Factory Acts . Leave was given to bring in the bill . Mr . M'Evoy , who was to have moved the second reading of the Ecclesiastical Titles Act Repeal Bill , announced

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1867-05-18, Page 18” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 16 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_18051867/page/18/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
FREEMASONRY CONSIDERED. Article 1
HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY IN CORNWALL. Article 2
CHESHIRE EDUCATIONAL MASONIC INSTITUTION. Article 4
THE NEMESIS: A TALE OF THE DAYS OF TRAJAN. Article 5
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 6
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 8
THE LODGE OF CHARITY (No. 223). Article 9
A BUD OF PROMISE. Article 9
"PALMAM QUI MERUIT FERAT." Article 9
METROPOLITAN. Article 10
PROVINCIAL. Article 11
ROYAL ARCH. Article 11
MARK MASONRY. Article 12
HIGH KHIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 13
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR. Article 13
RED CROSS KNIGHTS AND K.H.S. Article 16
CHANNEL ISLANDS. Article 16
REVIEWS. Article 16
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, MUSIC, DRAMA, AND THE FINE ARTS. Article 17
Poetry. Article 17
TRAIN UP A CHILD IN THE WAY HE SHOULD GO. Article 17
MEETINGS OF THE SCIENTIFIC AND LEARNED SOCIETIES FOR THE WEEK ENDING MAT Article 17
THE WEEK. Article 17
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

3 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

3 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

4 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

3 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

5 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

7 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 18

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Week.

Majesty and their Royal Highnossos Princess Louise , Pnnco Leopold , and Princess Beatrice . Tho Quoon and Princess Boatrico rodo on ponies in tho grounds on tho morning of tho 13 th inst . The Queen drovo out in tho afternoon , accompanied by Princess Lom ' so , and her Majesty walked in tho grounds on tho morning of tho 14 th hist , with Princo Leopold . Tho Qnoon drovo out iu the afternoon , accompanied hy Princess Louiso , and attended hy

the Hon . Mrs . Gordon ; and her Majesty walked and drovo in tho grounds on tho morning of tho loth inst . with Princess Louiso . IJIPEHIAIJ PAELIAMTENT . —In the HOUSE OE LOBDS on the 9 th inst ., in reply to Earl Russell , Lord Derby announced that at the sitting of the Conference an understanding was come to . His lordship declined to be very explicit on the matter pending

the arrangement of details . He said enough , however , to show that the fortress of Luxemburg is to bo evacuated by the Prussians , and the Grand Duchy neutralised under the guarantee of the Great Powers . This , he said , was simply such an alteration of the treaty of 1839 as the exclusion of the Grand Duchy from the Germanic Confederation made necessary .

On the 10 th inst ., the Marquis of Clanricarde wished to call attention to the Fenian trials now going on in Dublin . He urged very strongly that the Government should supply authentic reports of the whole of the proceedings . The Earl of Derby gave no satisfactory reply . In effect he declined to produce the reports which the Government had

received in reference to Fenianism . Tlie Earl of Derby gave to tho Houso on tho 13 th inst . a full account of tho result of tho labours of tho London Conference , whilo tho Houso of Commons had to bo satisfied with tho bare announcement by Lord Stanley that tho Conference had concluded its labours , and that as soon as possible tho papers would bo laid npon tho table . According to tho statcmont made to tho Poors ,

Lusomburg is to ho separated from tho Germanic Confederation . Tho fortress is to ho dismantled to such an extent as will satisfy tho King of Holland , and tho Duchy placed under tho collective guarantee of tho Groat Powers . Prussia , of course , withdraws her forces , and Limburg is placed wholly under tho sovereignty of tho King of Holland . In explanation to Lord Stanley of Aldorley , tho Premier stated that tho guarantee was not joint

and separate , but a collective ono . Tho interpretation to bo put upon this is , wo presume , that in case tho neutrality of Luxemburg should bo broken , England alone could not bo called upon to interfere . — Subsequently tho Houso wont into committee on tho bill for tho incre . iso of tho episcopate . Several clauses woro agreed to and amendments inserted , and

tho further consideration of tho bill was postponed . There was a warm and long discussion on tbe 14 th inst . in reference to the ritualistic practices now so much in vogue in certain of the Church of England places of worship . Tbe Earl of Shaftesbury moved the second reading of the Clerical A estments Bill , the object of which is to declare what vestments are

and what vestments are not legal . The noble earl went into a lengthy review of the whole question , and insisted that something must he done to put down ritualism . Tho Archbishop of Canterbury advocated delay until the royal commission should have xeported . As the Earl of Shaftesbury declined to accede to this suggestion , his Grace moved that the debate be

adjourned for tiro months . In the discussion which followed , several bishops and lay peers took part . Eventually the motion for adjournment was carried hy 81 to 48 votes . In the HOUSE OE COMMONS , on the 9 th inst ., the troubles present and prospective of the compound householder were the chief topic of the debate when the House got into committee on the Reform Bill . Mr . Mill made a most lucid speech against tho mendinents proposed by the Chancellor of the Exchequer

General Peel denounced tbe whole scheme . Mr . Gladstone spoke at some length , condemning the tendency of the policy pursued by the Government in respect of the measure . Subsequently Mr . Lowe and Mr . Bright made speeches . Tbe debate altogether was most interesting . ——Ou the lOth inst . owing to the withdrawal by Sir J . Pakington

of his proposal to take votes on the army estimates , the House had a very short sitting . None of the motions of which notice had been given came on . Mr . Bright having asked a question as to the Meetings in Parks Bill , the Chancellor of the Exchequer answered that notice would be given when the bill would come on . The Scotch Reform Bill would be taken first

on the 13 th inst ., aud after that the English Reform Bill . The House rose by a quarter past five o ' clock . On the 15 th inst . the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced to the House the resignation of Mr . AValpole , intimating that he would continue to have a seat in the Cabinet without holding office . Mr . Disraeli passed a high eulogium on the late Home Secretary .

Several members were anxious to know what was to be done with respect to the Meetings in Parks Bill , hut the Chancellor of the Exchequer declined to give any information . AVhen the successor to Mr . A \ alpole was in his place , he would state the course that would he taken . —The Chancellor of the Exchequer then asked leave to introduce the Scotch Reform Bill , the

provisions of which he very briefly described . The borough suffrage is to be virtually a £ i rental ; the country franchise a £ 15 occupation , with no change in the property franchise . Seven new members are to be given to Scotland . Of these one is to be given to Glasgow , which is to be divided into two boroughs for parliamentary r _ UI'Poses ' One member is to be given to the Universities of Edinburgh and St . Andrew's jointly , and oue to the Universities of

Glasgow and Aberdeen jointly . Lanarkshire , Ayrshire , and Aberdeenshire are to be divided , and an additional member given to each . The seventh member goes to a new group of boroughs . The proposal of the Government was criticised by several Scotch members , most of whom approved of the borough suffrage proposed , hut altogether opposed the distribution of seats part of the bill . Mr . Gladstone , in criticising the bill , declared that it

was the strongest condemnation of the English hill . Mr . Disraeli replied , and having been pressed to say where the seven new members for Scotland were to come from , intimated that tbey were to be a clear addition to the number of members in . the House . Leave was given to bring iu the bill , which was introduced and read a first time . —The House then went into

committee on the English Reform Bill . Alter some discussion ,, words were inserted at the instance of the Chancellor of the Exchequer , with a view of carrying out the policy as to compound householders for which the Government have obtained the support of the House . Later the question of the lodger franchise was again raised . Lord Stanley , on the

14 th inst ., was questioned in reference to the Abyssinian prisoners . His lordship had no good news . In effect his statement was that the king refused to release the prisoners . — Colonel Barttelot moved for a select committee to inquire into the operation of the malt tax , and forthwith the House went into a long discussion on the subject . The Government ,

however , made no opposition to the motion , and it was agreed to . — Subsequently Mr . Fawcett , in an able speech , moved for leave to bring in a hill to compel the education of children under thirteen years of age in the agricultural districts . Mr . Fawcett proposes to apply to these children provisions not unlike those contained in the Factory Acts . Leave was given to bring in the bill . Mr . M'Evoy , who was to have moved the second reading of the Ecclesiastical Titles Act Repeal Bill , announced

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 17
  • You're on page18
  • 19
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy