Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • March 16, 1861
  • Page 9
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 16, 1861: Page 9

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 16, 1861
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article FALL OF THE CENTRAL TOWER AND SPIRE OF CHICHESTER CATHEDRAL. ← Page 2 of 3 →
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Fall Of The Central Tower And Spire Of Chichester Cathedral.

proving to have a large quantity of mortar , much of it in a very decayed and friable state , with much chalk , some stones from the seaside , and some moulded stones , evidently parts of a previous building . In November last a settlement was observed to occur in the south face of the north-west pier , to the rig ht of the respond of the western great arch : by it the new facing

was fractured , the seam extending from 8 or 9 feet from the floor down to about 3 feet , through several stones , as well as down the joints . About the same time some of the old fissures in the south-west pier were observed to extend themselves down into the new work . Some time after a crack was observed to open in the north-west pier on its north side , corresponding nearly with what had previously occurred on its other face . The attention ofthe architect

was directed to these , and at the end of the year Mr . Yarrow also inspected them . As a precaution it was determined to add centres in all the arches connecting these two piers with the nave and transepts , and these further centres were at once commenced , although only one of them was ever erected , in consequence of its being found absolutely necessary to apply shores and other remedies of

a less formal character . On the 25 th of January the seams in the north-west pier were barely a sixteenth of an inch in width ,, they thou extended about 12 feet high , and at the seam there was a marked tendency on both sides of the pier for the centre part of the wall to bulge , although , the inward movement had not advanced more than a sixteenth of an inch ; the eastern respond of this pier , which was part

of the new work , then stood perfectly straight . On the southivest pier one particular old crack , several feet iu length , at about half the hei ght . of the northside , was observed to be not more than an eighth of an inch wide . On the south side of the pier the old fissures dividing it from the south transept were no larger than they had been for many years ; on the contrary , they appeared to he somewhat lessindicating a

ten-, dency in the pier to bulge to the south ; but so slight was the change , that it' was difficult to detect it . On the 14 th of February the south-west pier was observed to be dividing from east , to west for a height of several feet , at the level of the springing of the nave arches , its north or inside facing becoming entirely detached , to all appearance . This was by the extension of au old fissure in the eastern respond right through

the pier into the nave arch . On the loth the north west pier was observed to have bulged to the extent of five-sixteenths of au inch on its inside face , where , on the 25 th of January , it had been only one sixteenth ; and as the seam in the north face remained unaltered , it was evident that a vertical fracture from east to west , in the interior , had separated the two parts . The nature of this fracture also appeared in some seams both

in the east and west responds ; on this day also the east respond , lately , newly-built , was observed to bulge eastwards 8 or 9 feet from the floor . A fresh fracture and movement had also occurred in the clerestory window of the north transept . In the south-west pier the old fissure , noticed on the 25 th of January , had opened to half an inch wide , and a very general opening of the fissures had occurred : besides , the old fissures

in the transept wall were distinctly closed , and that with so much force as to bulge out the facing of the transept wall , both inside and outside . At the same time it was ascertained , by an examination carried to the very summit of the spire , that no movement had occurred in the upper part of the building . The conclusion arrived at was that nothing could stay the ruin of the iers ifciless a jacketing of solid timber

p could be applied , powerfully hooped together with iron holts and balks of timber ; the object being to prevent the bursting out of the facing of the piers , which was evidently going on , ancl was caused by the crushed and rotten state " of the interior . Alread y at the tops of the north ancl south arches there was Warning of their tendency to slip off ancl down the backs of the centres .

The jacketing was considered a most urgent matter , and the preparation of it was entrusted to Mr . Bushby , of littlehampton , a builder well-known for his skill and energy . The arrangement of these measures was concluded on Saturday , the 10 th February . On the Sunday following , it was found that a tendency to crush and bul ge the facing iu one part of the south-west pier , which was ^ decidedly the weakest , was very apparent ; and although divine service was proceeding in the afternoon in a

part ofthe nave temporarily screened oft for the purpose , it was found necessary to prepare , without waiting for its termination , for all the shoring that could be effected in the emergency . IE this duty the men of Mr . Johnson , of Chichester , carpenter , aud Mr . Kitsen , mason , worked with unflagging energy till three hours past midnight . On Monday , the 18 th , they resumed their work before daylight , and it was vigorously prosecuted till

ten o ' clock p . m ., ft-esh weaknesses constantly calling for fresb remedies . On Tuesday , the work proceeded as before , but the failures becoming more frequent , it was found necessary , even at the risk of interrupting Mr . Busliby ' s important preparations , to call some of his men to resist the most immediate clanger , and with the additional force , the work was prosecuted till past midnight . During this day , alsothe dean ancl chapter

, having determined to lake independent advice , the building was minutely examined by Mr . Christian , architect . Another examination to the top of the spire ou this clay showed that that part yet retained its upright position . On "Wednesday , the 20 th , the tendency to crush the south transept wall , about the old fissures , was very alarming , and the bulging increased very rapidly , both in it and in the lower part of the south-west pies ,

in which , at 7 or 3 feet from the floor , the facing bulged about 3 inches out on the south side -. on the north side it strained the timber braces placed between it and the north-west pier , ancl one of them began to bend . It was deemed necessary to add Mr-Bushby's presence , with fresh additions of men , to the force already employed . About five o'clock , the south-west pier settled clovot about three-quarters of an inch , crushing in the centre , and leaving in parts of its north face at about 4- feet from the groundthe front o (

, thestones standing to their original height and perfect , whilst the back part ofthe same stones was erushedand compressed down three-quarters of an inch . During some hours the crushed , mortar had been , pouring out ominously from the old fissures in the triforium wall <__ the south transept , flakes of facing stone , too , occasionally fell . AVith evening came a terrific storm of wind . To those within , the building it appeared at first to beat on the north-east side of the

church ; but as night advanced , it came with unabated violence from the south-west . About half-past eight , p . m ., a mass of brickwork , built up probably in the last century to fill in the triforium arch on the south : side of the nave , next the tower , fell into the church . A strut of the triforium roof had a bearing upon it , and by the settlement ofthe walls the strut had unshed the brickwork over . An hour and a . half past midnight stone was heard to fall outside the tower in the north-west part . It was found , to iuree

broken the triforium roof , but the p lace of the weakness could oat be ascertained during the darkness . The working parties continued to add shoring till three hours aud a half past mUhugltt _ and amongst the latest of their labours was the strengthening of one of the braces before mentioned , between the north-west and south-west piers , which , before the remedy could he applied , wa _ bent to the extent of a foot . On Thursdaythe 21 stthe working parties returned Wore

day-, , light . Soon after it was ascertained that the fall of stone whielt hacl occurred during the night , outside the north-west part of the tower , was from the arch of the clerestory window of the nave close by . The pier appeared to have sunk nearly an inch , carrying down , one jamb of the window with it , unci thereby loosening the arch stones , which fell out . It was also perceived that the head of this pier had become much seamed with cracks during the night , and the head of the south-east pier , where hut slight marks of new

failures had before appeared , was cracked , and audibly cracking in many directions . To the weight thrown ou these two piers by tho settlement of the south-west pier early on Wednesday evening , awi to the straining of the storm , is probably to be attributed the mischief now found in progress at the tops of the north-west and south-east piers . About the bottom of the south-west pier , shores applied only the night before were found to bend . Strenuous efforts to increase the number of the shores were made hy about seventy

men , at work under ancl around the tower . Crushed mortar appeared in large quantities flaked stones fell more frequently , and especially from the south-east pier , whence none had fallen before ; whole stones burst out , and fell more than once . The position o £ those who worked was critical . Before noon the failing of the shores became still more evident ; no appearance of bending or weakness was , however , observed in the three centres under the great archesthough evidentlhearing an enormous load . The

, y straining of the shores showed that the piers bad arrived at the last extremity , and warning was then given to the inhabitants near the building to the south-west , as it was clear that the fall of the southwest pier , if it happened before thc others , must have thrown the tower and spire in that direction . At one o ' clock , when the workmen returned from dinner , Jfr . Bushby prevented most of _&_ men from re-entering the building , and about thirty who haii - .-reentered or remained were brought out : it being ascertained ths .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1861-03-16, Page 9” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 30 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_16031861/page/9/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE BOYS' SCHOOL. Article 1
MEMOIRS OF THE FREEMASONS OF NAPLES. Article 1
STRAY THOUGHTS ON THE ORIGIN AND PROGRESS OF THE FINE ARTS. Article 3
CLASSICAL THEOLOGY—XLI . Article 4
SOME OBSERVATIONS IN EGYPT. Article 5
FALL OF THE CENTRAL TOWER AND SPIRE OF CHICHESTER CATHEDRAL. Article 8
ALTERATIONS TO THE NATIONAL GALLERY. Article 10
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 11
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE, AND ART. Article 12
Poetry. Article 13
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 14
METROPOLITAN. Article 15
PROVINCIAL. Article 16
ROYAL ARCH. Article 17
MARK MASONRY. Article 18
CHANNEL ISLANDS. Article 18
TURKEY. Article 18
AMERICA. Article 18
Obituary. Article 19
THE WEEK. Article 19
PUBLIC AMUSEMENTS. Article 20
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

1 Article
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

3 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

3 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

6 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

3 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

4 Articles
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Fall Of The Central Tower And Spire Of Chichester Cathedral.

proving to have a large quantity of mortar , much of it in a very decayed and friable state , with much chalk , some stones from the seaside , and some moulded stones , evidently parts of a previous building . In November last a settlement was observed to occur in the south face of the north-west pier , to the rig ht of the respond of the western great arch : by it the new facing

was fractured , the seam extending from 8 or 9 feet from the floor down to about 3 feet , through several stones , as well as down the joints . About the same time some of the old fissures in the south-west pier were observed to extend themselves down into the new work . Some time after a crack was observed to open in the north-west pier on its north side , corresponding nearly with what had previously occurred on its other face . The attention ofthe architect

was directed to these , and at the end of the year Mr . Yarrow also inspected them . As a precaution it was determined to add centres in all the arches connecting these two piers with the nave and transepts , and these further centres were at once commenced , although only one of them was ever erected , in consequence of its being found absolutely necessary to apply shores and other remedies of

a less formal character . On the 25 th of January the seams in the north-west pier were barely a sixteenth of an inch in width ,, they thou extended about 12 feet high , and at the seam there was a marked tendency on both sides of the pier for the centre part of the wall to bulge , although , the inward movement had not advanced more than a sixteenth of an inch ; the eastern respond of this pier , which was part

of the new work , then stood perfectly straight . On the southivest pier one particular old crack , several feet iu length , at about half the hei ght . of the northside , was observed to be not more than an eighth of an inch wide . On the south side of the pier the old fissures dividing it from the south transept were no larger than they had been for many years ; on the contrary , they appeared to he somewhat lessindicating a

ten-, dency in the pier to bulge to the south ; but so slight was the change , that it' was difficult to detect it . On the 14 th of February the south-west pier was observed to be dividing from east , to west for a height of several feet , at the level of the springing of the nave arches , its north or inside facing becoming entirely detached , to all appearance . This was by the extension of au old fissure in the eastern respond right through

the pier into the nave arch . On the loth the north west pier was observed to have bulged to the extent of five-sixteenths of au inch on its inside face , where , on the 25 th of January , it had been only one sixteenth ; and as the seam in the north face remained unaltered , it was evident that a vertical fracture from east to west , in the interior , had separated the two parts . The nature of this fracture also appeared in some seams both

in the east and west responds ; on this day also the east respond , lately , newly-built , was observed to bulge eastwards 8 or 9 feet from the floor . A fresh fracture and movement had also occurred in the clerestory window of the north transept . In the south-west pier the old fissure , noticed on the 25 th of January , had opened to half an inch wide , and a very general opening of the fissures had occurred : besides , the old fissures

in the transept wall were distinctly closed , and that with so much force as to bulge out the facing of the transept wall , both inside and outside . At the same time it was ascertained , by an examination carried to the very summit of the spire , that no movement had occurred in the upper part of the building . The conclusion arrived at was that nothing could stay the ruin of the iers ifciless a jacketing of solid timber

p could be applied , powerfully hooped together with iron holts and balks of timber ; the object being to prevent the bursting out of the facing of the piers , which was evidently going on , ancl was caused by the crushed and rotten state " of the interior . Alread y at the tops of the north ancl south arches there was Warning of their tendency to slip off ancl down the backs of the centres .

The jacketing was considered a most urgent matter , and the preparation of it was entrusted to Mr . Bushby , of littlehampton , a builder well-known for his skill and energy . The arrangement of these measures was concluded on Saturday , the 10 th February . On the Sunday following , it was found that a tendency to crush and bul ge the facing iu one part of the south-west pier , which was ^ decidedly the weakest , was very apparent ; and although divine service was proceeding in the afternoon in a

part ofthe nave temporarily screened oft for the purpose , it was found necessary to prepare , without waiting for its termination , for all the shoring that could be effected in the emergency . IE this duty the men of Mr . Johnson , of Chichester , carpenter , aud Mr . Kitsen , mason , worked with unflagging energy till three hours past midnight . On Monday , the 18 th , they resumed their work before daylight , and it was vigorously prosecuted till

ten o ' clock p . m ., ft-esh weaknesses constantly calling for fresb remedies . On Tuesday , the work proceeded as before , but the failures becoming more frequent , it was found necessary , even at the risk of interrupting Mr . Busliby ' s important preparations , to call some of his men to resist the most immediate clanger , and with the additional force , the work was prosecuted till past midnight . During this day , alsothe dean ancl chapter

, having determined to lake independent advice , the building was minutely examined by Mr . Christian , architect . Another examination to the top of the spire ou this clay showed that that part yet retained its upright position . On "Wednesday , the 20 th , the tendency to crush the south transept wall , about the old fissures , was very alarming , and the bulging increased very rapidly , both in it and in the lower part of the south-west pies ,

in which , at 7 or 3 feet from the floor , the facing bulged about 3 inches out on the south side -. on the north side it strained the timber braces placed between it and the north-west pier , ancl one of them began to bend . It was deemed necessary to add Mr-Bushby's presence , with fresh additions of men , to the force already employed . About five o'clock , the south-west pier settled clovot about three-quarters of an inch , crushing in the centre , and leaving in parts of its north face at about 4- feet from the groundthe front o (

, thestones standing to their original height and perfect , whilst the back part ofthe same stones was erushedand compressed down three-quarters of an inch . During some hours the crushed , mortar had been , pouring out ominously from the old fissures in the triforium wall <__ the south transept , flakes of facing stone , too , occasionally fell . AVith evening came a terrific storm of wind . To those within , the building it appeared at first to beat on the north-east side of the

church ; but as night advanced , it came with unabated violence from the south-west . About half-past eight , p . m ., a mass of brickwork , built up probably in the last century to fill in the triforium arch on the south : side of the nave , next the tower , fell into the church . A strut of the triforium roof had a bearing upon it , and by the settlement ofthe walls the strut had unshed the brickwork over . An hour and a . half past midnight stone was heard to fall outside the tower in the north-west part . It was found , to iuree

broken the triforium roof , but the p lace of the weakness could oat be ascertained during the darkness . The working parties continued to add shoring till three hours aud a half past mUhugltt _ and amongst the latest of their labours was the strengthening of one of the braces before mentioned , between the north-west and south-west piers , which , before the remedy could he applied , wa _ bent to the extent of a foot . On Thursdaythe 21 stthe working parties returned Wore

day-, , light . Soon after it was ascertained that the fall of stone whielt hacl occurred during the night , outside the north-west part of the tower , was from the arch of the clerestory window of the nave close by . The pier appeared to have sunk nearly an inch , carrying down , one jamb of the window with it , unci thereby loosening the arch stones , which fell out . It was also perceived that the head of this pier had become much seamed with cracks during the night , and the head of the south-east pier , where hut slight marks of new

failures had before appeared , was cracked , and audibly cracking in many directions . To the weight thrown ou these two piers by tho settlement of the south-west pier early on Wednesday evening , awi to the straining of the storm , is probably to be attributed the mischief now found in progress at the tops of the north-west and south-east piers . About the bottom of the south-west pier , shores applied only the night before were found to bend . Strenuous efforts to increase the number of the shores were made hy about seventy

men , at work under ancl around the tower . Crushed mortar appeared in large quantities flaked stones fell more frequently , and especially from the south-east pier , whence none had fallen before ; whole stones burst out , and fell more than once . The position o £ those who worked was critical . Before noon the failing of the shores became still more evident ; no appearance of bending or weakness was , however , observed in the three centres under the great archesthough evidentlhearing an enormous load . The

, y straining of the shores showed that the piers bad arrived at the last extremity , and warning was then given to the inhabitants near the building to the south-west , as it was clear that the fall of the southwest pier , if it happened before thc others , must have thrown the tower and spire in that direction . At one o ' clock , when the workmen returned from dinner , Jfr . Bushby prevented most of _&_ men from re-entering the building , and about thirty who haii - .-reentered or remained were brought out : it being ascertained ths .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 8
  • You're on page9
  • 10
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy