Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine
  • March 10, 1860
  • Page 13
  • THE MASONIC MIRROR.
Current:

The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 10, 1860: Page 13

  • Back to The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine, March 10, 1860
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE MASONIC MIRROR. ← Page 2 of 4 →
Page 13

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Masonic Mirror.

unanimously passed at the last meeting ( No , no ); but ho thought that right ought xo be exercised AA'ith caution . He AA-as not going to discuss the scheme as laid doAvn for advancing these moneys . It might be good or bad , but it AA-as not yet before them , and the time to consider it AA'ould come hereafter ; but ivhat they UOAV had to consider AA-as the resolution adopted at thc last meeting , " That it Avould be a legitimate and judicious application of the funds of General Purposes to advance money on loan to Provincial Lodges to assist them in erecting Masonic

halls or Lodge rooms , provided that proper security bo given for the repayment of the principal , Avith interest , Ai'ithiu a reasonable period . " That AA-as AA'hat they had IIOAV to consider—not Avhether the securities Avere good and sufficient , but AA'hether the princi ple propounded AA-as just and upright . The greater part of the speech of Bro . Stebbing Avas not in opposition to tho principle , but to tho details under AA'hich the principle was to be carried out . Nobody denied the justice of tho plan , but the arguments AA-ere only against the machinery for carrying it out . Bros .

Stebbing and Hop-. vood dealt with the question as though they had to deal Avith a pack of rogues determined to cheat Grand Lodge . ( No , no ) . All their arguments bore that . tendency , for theydAvelt upon the necessity there would be of going to la' . v , and thc bugbear of the Court of Chancery was held before their eyes to frighten them . He believed there Avould never be any such necessity , and that they Avould have even a stronger security than any legal security for the money , in the obligations which would be entered into under Masonic penalties . He

approved the scheme , because it would tend to withdraAv Lodges from taverns and those temptations to enjoyment held out by such places , and the consequent economising of their funds for charitable and other purposes . He abjured them not to iet their scheme fall through from any idea that there Avould be any difficulty Avith regard to the securities , as it Avould lie the duty of the Board of General Purposes to see that the security was good and proper . They ware told that the securities were not goodand that they Avould not be able to recover their money

, Avithout legal proceedings . He AA'as not a lawyer , but he had alu-ays looked upon a mortgage upon real property as a good security , in which they had the right to foreclose and thereby realize their property . Figures Avere notoriously fallacious , but facts were more so . Bro . Stebbings had told them of a Lodge at CoAves which had onlv paid the

mortgagee , and of another at Hyde AA'hich cost £ 600 and sold for £ -100 ; and they must remember that they AA-ould never lend so close as that . NOAV , as he before observed , they were going to subject to Masonic peualties brethren who did not keep to the engagements they entered into with Grand Lodge , and that he looked upon as a greater security than any legal tie they could have ; and further , let Grand Lodge remember that each individual case AA-ould come before them , and upon each AA-ould they have a veto . Bro . Stebbing spoke of the difficulties

they might have to contend with at Berwick- ' upon-TAA-eed and tlie Channel Islands , ibnt it would be their OAVU fault if they placed themselves in any such difficulties ; and he trusted they would not abandon a plan AA'hich AA'as just and proper for fear of difficulties arising in the mode of carrying it out . ( Cheers ) . Bro . MASON thought , ou reflection , Bro . Gregory Avould AA'ithdraw his observation relative to looking upon the brethren as rogues , as it was not just but hi g hly improper , and he believed that no thought of that

kind over entered the heads of either Bro . Stebbing or Bro . Hopwood . ( Hear , hear ) . He was glad to find that Bro . Gregory could regard the Court of Chancery only as a bugbear , though he ( Bro . Mason ) must be alloAved to look upon it with greater respect . He kneAV that that court did a great deal of good , but it also at times did a great deal of eA-il , and they ought not to run the slightest risk of being brought before it . He gave the Board of General Purposes credit for good intentions iu bringing this proposition before them ( cheers ); but he belieA'ed they had made a great mistake . NOAV AA'hat were the advantages to be gained ?—AVhat could they gain by taking their property out of the funds at 3 per

cent . , and lending it on mortgage at i- per cent . ? AVhy , on tho whole sum of £ 2 , 000 they could not obtain more than an extra £ 20 a year , and that only with thc risk of being continually iu litigation . Then what advantages could tho Provincial brethren obtain ? None ; for if they had proper and good security , thoy could have no difficulty in obtaining from building societies , or private individuals , that aid Avhich it was IIOAV proposed Grand Lodges should afford them . He saw many difficulties into Avhich they might be dr , awn Avithout any corresponding

arli-antage , and he must therefore vote for the amendment of Bro . Stebbing . Bro . CorTRELL , thought that the brethren Avere labouring under a mistake as to the subject before them for discussion . He agreed Avith Bro . Stebbing that there might be considerable difficulties in carrying out the scheme as proposed , and which thoy would have to consider when it came fully before them , but that was no reason for not confirming an affirmation that it was expedient to aid in the building of Masonic halls on good and substantial security . AVhcre they had made the

mistake he believed to be this , that in the first instance they did not go far enough . If they had put the resolution that tho trustees of their funds should be enabled to lend the money on the security of real estate , there would have been no difficulty about the matter . As a lawyer he kneiv that in all settlements—the most delicate of trust deeds—clauses were inserted to enable the trustees to lend money on mortgage : and all they had iu viOAv AA-as to lend money on freehold property . He M-onld not go into a discussion on thc statute of mortmain , because that only dealt with the difficult y of retaining lands after thev had got them . All that Avas now proposed was to lend fifty per cent , of the cost of Masonic halls in the

provinces , and it Avas tho duty of tho Board of General Purposes and of Grand Lodge to see that the security Avas good and proper , aud he could not perceive thc smallest conceivable danger of the Board of General Purposes being brought into Chancery or iu any way involved iu litigation . If they had the proper covenants iu their mortgage deed and the repayments Avere not punctually made according to agreement , they Avould have nothing to do but to sell the property and repay themselves without going to Chancery or involving themselves in one shilling

of laiv expenses , and no one could complain of the trustees exercising that rig ht . Ho agreed that it would bo invidious for one Masonic brother to be taking proceedings against another , but was it not a common thing even for brothers' in blood to assist one another with money on mortgage , and though they knew of the contingencies AA'hich might arise , that did not deter them from doing good for fear of difficulties AA'hich might loom in the future . There mig ht be difficulties iu the scheme as laid downbut those they could entertain when they came to

, consider its details , and lie trusted would have no influence in determining their decision on the question IIOAV before them . Bro . HOI-AVOOD asked ( amidst loud cries of spoke ) Avhat security the trustees would have against the consequences of auy suit which might be brought against them ? Bro . CoTTitiiLTi replied that all the security that would be required was a trust deed well known to hwyers , and that then a resolution of Grand Lodge authorising them to lend the money Avould be a perfect

security and indemnity against all consequences . Bro . HAVERS said he felt it his duty to offer one or two observations upon the motion before the chair . First of all he Avished the brethren to dismiss from their minds all the perturbed ghosts of possible LAV suits , for no man more sincerely Avished than he to keep the Craft clear of litigation , aud he Avould say , far distant be the day that AA'itnessed Grand Lodge going into the Court of Chancery ; but the question before them was one which they should look at neither with a strictly legal

, nor a strictly commercial eye . The question they really had to consider Avas , whether it AA-as a laudable object to keep their provincial brethren clear of taverns . It was no argument to say that Masonic halls had failed in certain provincial tOAA-ns ; and Avith regard to what had fallen from Bro . Stebbing , that the proposal AA'as not popular in the

provinces , he had only to say that the Board of General Purposes had good reason to knoAV that it Avas there most popular . Bro . Stebbing had told them that during the last seven years they had expended £ 7 , 000 in the cause of charity ; bi \ t was that , he Avould ask , any reason why they should not lend £ 2 , 000 to their provincial brethren ? He would ask them IIOAV it Avas the Craft had obtained the hall in which they were that moment met ? They obtained it upon the credit of debentures AA-hich AA'ere regularly met and paid , and he would ask them if they had

ei-ei- heard of .-1113-litigation arising out of those debentures ? It had been AA-ell said by Bro . Gregory that they had upon Lodges to AA-hich they might advance money , a greater and a stronger claim than any AA'ith which the land mig ht furnish them ; they had the claim AA'hich rested upon every good and honest Mason , and AA-as it to be supposed that the Masons of the present Avere less honest than their forefathers had proved themselves to be . There was one other matter to which , he Avished to call their attention . They had on former occasions lent money

to the several Masonic charities , and these loans had Avithout any such security being given for them , as AA-as now proposed , been punctually repaid , and that being the case , they had no reason to doubt that the loans now proposed Avould be faithfully and punctually refunded . He mig ht then be permitted to say that the whole question narroAved itself to this issue—should Grand Lodges risk £ 2 , 000 on thc honour and good faith of the provincial brethren ? He trusted it Avould never go forth that they doubted the honour , good faith and probity of their brethren in the provinces , but that on the contrary , that so hig h was the character in AA-hich Grand Lodge held them , that it ii'as felt they AA-ould

faithfully fulfil any covenant into which they might enter . Bro . MOTION' observed that the question was not Avhether they should lay aside all consideration of probable laAvsuits but Avhether they would eA-er get back their money . BRO . SY - . AIMONDS conceived that Bro . Motion ' s question had been already aiiSAvered by Bro . Mason . If the provincial brethren did not meet their engagements , the property could be sold , and AA'ould command in the market a price fully sufficient to repay the advance made b y

Grand Lodge . Bro . RICIIARDSOX , as the Master of a Provincial Lodge , said that tho brethren of that Lodge , of which thc Most AVorshipful Grand Master was himself a member , had purchaser ! tho building in AA-hich they met , but as they had not been able to raise by subscriptions the sum required for the purchase , they took the deeds and lodged them iu the hands of a brother , AVIIO , having that security , alloAved them tojhave the money which they required . If , then , a private member of the Craft

thought he might safely advance money upon such security , Grand Lodge might , he thought , fearlessly expect that whatever money it advanced would be faithfully repaid . A BIIOTHKB stated that he attended at the request of several provincial brethren to state that their vievA-s were entirely opposed to tho proposition . The brethren in the province to which he belonged ( Hampshire ) did not want an advance of money from Grand Lodge . Bro . H . BniDCKs said that he belonged to three distinct provinces , and he spoke the feeling of al 1 the brethren there iu supporting the original proposition .

“The Freemasons' Monthly Magazine: 1860-03-10, Page 13” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 1 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmr/issues/mmr_10031860/page/13/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
GRAND LODGE. Article 1
CLASSICAL THEOLOGY.—XV. Article 1
CURSORY REMARKS ON FREEMASONRY.-II. Article 3
MASTERPIECES OF THE ARCHITECTURE OF DIFFERENT NATIONS. Article 4
THE GRAND DESIGN OF MASONRY. Article 5
THE RELIGIOUS ASPECT OF MASONRY. Article 5
MASONIC NOTES AND QUERIES. Article 6
Literature. REVIEWS. Article 7
Poetry. Article 11
THE MASONIC TRINITY. Article 11
THE MASONIC MIRROR. Article 12
PROVINCIAL. Article 15
KNIGKTS TEMPLAR. Article 18
AMERICA. Article 18
GERMANY. Article 19
MASONIC FESTIVITIES. Article 19
THE WEEK. Article 19
TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 20
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

4 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

3 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

4 Articles
Page 20

Page 20

3 Articles
Page 13

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Masonic Mirror.

unanimously passed at the last meeting ( No , no ); but ho thought that right ought xo be exercised AA'ith caution . He AA-as not going to discuss the scheme as laid doAvn for advancing these moneys . It might be good or bad , but it AA-as not yet before them , and the time to consider it AA'ould come hereafter ; but ivhat they UOAV had to consider AA-as the resolution adopted at thc last meeting , " That it Avould be a legitimate and judicious application of the funds of General Purposes to advance money on loan to Provincial Lodges to assist them in erecting Masonic

halls or Lodge rooms , provided that proper security bo given for the repayment of the principal , Avith interest , Ai'ithiu a reasonable period . " That AA-as AA'hat they had IIOAV to consider—not Avhether the securities Avere good and sufficient , but AA'hether the princi ple propounded AA-as just and upright . The greater part of the speech of Bro . Stebbing Avas not in opposition to tho principle , but to tho details under AA'hich the principle was to be carried out . Nobody denied the justice of tho plan , but the arguments AA-ere only against the machinery for carrying it out . Bros .

Stebbing and Hop-. vood dealt with the question as though they had to deal Avith a pack of rogues determined to cheat Grand Lodge . ( No , no ) . All their arguments bore that . tendency , for theydAvelt upon the necessity there would be of going to la' . v , and thc bugbear of the Court of Chancery was held before their eyes to frighten them . He believed there Avould never be any such necessity , and that they Avould have even a stronger security than any legal security for the money , in the obligations which would be entered into under Masonic penalties . He

approved the scheme , because it would tend to withdraAv Lodges from taverns and those temptations to enjoyment held out by such places , and the consequent economising of their funds for charitable and other purposes . He abjured them not to iet their scheme fall through from any idea that there Avould be any difficulty Avith regard to the securities , as it Avould lie the duty of the Board of General Purposes to see that the security was good and proper . They ware told that the securities were not goodand that they Avould not be able to recover their money

, Avithout legal proceedings . He AA'as not a lawyer , but he had alu-ays looked upon a mortgage upon real property as a good security , in which they had the right to foreclose and thereby realize their property . Figures Avere notoriously fallacious , but facts were more so . Bro . Stebbings had told them of a Lodge at CoAves which had onlv paid the

mortgagee , and of another at Hyde AA'hich cost £ 600 and sold for £ -100 ; and they must remember that they AA-ould never lend so close as that . NOAV , as he before observed , they were going to subject to Masonic peualties brethren who did not keep to the engagements they entered into with Grand Lodge , and that he looked upon as a greater security than any legal tie they could have ; and further , let Grand Lodge remember that each individual case AA-ould come before them , and upon each AA-ould they have a veto . Bro . Stebbing spoke of the difficulties

they might have to contend with at Berwick- ' upon-TAA-eed and tlie Channel Islands , ibnt it would be their OAVU fault if they placed themselves in any such difficulties ; and he trusted they would not abandon a plan AA'hich AA'as just and proper for fear of difficulties arising in the mode of carrying it out . ( Cheers ) . Bro . MASON thought , ou reflection , Bro . Gregory Avould AA'ithdraw his observation relative to looking upon the brethren as rogues , as it was not just but hi g hly improper , and he believed that no thought of that

kind over entered the heads of either Bro . Stebbing or Bro . Hopwood . ( Hear , hear ) . He was glad to find that Bro . Gregory could regard the Court of Chancery only as a bugbear , though he ( Bro . Mason ) must be alloAved to look upon it with greater respect . He kneAV that that court did a great deal of good , but it also at times did a great deal of eA-il , and they ought not to run the slightest risk of being brought before it . He gave the Board of General Purposes credit for good intentions iu bringing this proposition before them ( cheers ); but he belieA'ed they had made a great mistake . NOAV AA'hat were the advantages to be gained ?—AVhat could they gain by taking their property out of the funds at 3 per

cent . , and lending it on mortgage at i- per cent . ? AVhy , on tho whole sum of £ 2 , 000 they could not obtain more than an extra £ 20 a year , and that only with thc risk of being continually iu litigation . Then what advantages could tho Provincial brethren obtain ? None ; for if they had proper and good security , thoy could have no difficulty in obtaining from building societies , or private individuals , that aid Avhich it was IIOAV proposed Grand Lodges should afford them . He saw many difficulties into Avhich they might be dr , awn Avithout any corresponding

arli-antage , and he must therefore vote for the amendment of Bro . Stebbing . Bro . CorTRELL , thought that the brethren Avere labouring under a mistake as to the subject before them for discussion . He agreed Avith Bro . Stebbing that there might be considerable difficulties in carrying out the scheme as proposed , and which thoy would have to consider when it came fully before them , but that was no reason for not confirming an affirmation that it was expedient to aid in the building of Masonic halls on good and substantial security . AVhcre they had made the

mistake he believed to be this , that in the first instance they did not go far enough . If they had put the resolution that tho trustees of their funds should be enabled to lend the money on the security of real estate , there would have been no difficulty about the matter . As a lawyer he kneiv that in all settlements—the most delicate of trust deeds—clauses were inserted to enable the trustees to lend money on mortgage : and all they had iu viOAv AA-as to lend money on freehold property . He M-onld not go into a discussion on thc statute of mortmain , because that only dealt with the difficult y of retaining lands after thev had got them . All that Avas now proposed was to lend fifty per cent , of the cost of Masonic halls in the

provinces , and it Avas tho duty of tho Board of General Purposes and of Grand Lodge to see that the security Avas good and proper , aud he could not perceive thc smallest conceivable danger of the Board of General Purposes being brought into Chancery or iu any way involved iu litigation . If they had the proper covenants iu their mortgage deed and the repayments Avere not punctually made according to agreement , they Avould have nothing to do but to sell the property and repay themselves without going to Chancery or involving themselves in one shilling

of laiv expenses , and no one could complain of the trustees exercising that rig ht . Ho agreed that it would bo invidious for one Masonic brother to be taking proceedings against another , but was it not a common thing even for brothers' in blood to assist one another with money on mortgage , and though they knew of the contingencies AA'hich might arise , that did not deter them from doing good for fear of difficulties AA'hich might loom in the future . There mig ht be difficulties iu the scheme as laid downbut those they could entertain when they came to

, consider its details , and lie trusted would have no influence in determining their decision on the question IIOAV before them . Bro . HOI-AVOOD asked ( amidst loud cries of spoke ) Avhat security the trustees would have against the consequences of auy suit which might be brought against them ? Bro . CoTTitiiLTi replied that all the security that would be required was a trust deed well known to hwyers , and that then a resolution of Grand Lodge authorising them to lend the money Avould be a perfect

security and indemnity against all consequences . Bro . HAVERS said he felt it his duty to offer one or two observations upon the motion before the chair . First of all he Avished the brethren to dismiss from their minds all the perturbed ghosts of possible LAV suits , for no man more sincerely Avished than he to keep the Craft clear of litigation , aud he Avould say , far distant be the day that AA'itnessed Grand Lodge going into the Court of Chancery ; but the question before them was one which they should look at neither with a strictly legal

, nor a strictly commercial eye . The question they really had to consider Avas , whether it AA-as a laudable object to keep their provincial brethren clear of taverns . It was no argument to say that Masonic halls had failed in certain provincial tOAA-ns ; and Avith regard to what had fallen from Bro . Stebbing , that the proposal AA'as not popular in the

provinces , he had only to say that the Board of General Purposes had good reason to knoAV that it Avas there most popular . Bro . Stebbing had told them that during the last seven years they had expended £ 7 , 000 in the cause of charity ; bi \ t was that , he Avould ask , any reason why they should not lend £ 2 , 000 to their provincial brethren ? He would ask them IIOAV it Avas the Craft had obtained the hall in which they were that moment met ? They obtained it upon the credit of debentures AA-hich AA'ere regularly met and paid , and he would ask them if they had

ei-ei- heard of .-1113-litigation arising out of those debentures ? It had been AA-ell said by Bro . Gregory that they had upon Lodges to AA-hich they might advance money , a greater and a stronger claim than any AA'ith which the land mig ht furnish them ; they had the claim AA'hich rested upon every good and honest Mason , and AA-as it to be supposed that the Masons of the present Avere less honest than their forefathers had proved themselves to be . There was one other matter to which , he Avished to call their attention . They had on former occasions lent money

to the several Masonic charities , and these loans had Avithout any such security being given for them , as AA-as now proposed , been punctually repaid , and that being the case , they had no reason to doubt that the loans now proposed Avould be faithfully and punctually refunded . He mig ht then be permitted to say that the whole question narroAved itself to this issue—should Grand Lodges risk £ 2 , 000 on thc honour and good faith of the provincial brethren ? He trusted it Avould never go forth that they doubted the honour , good faith and probity of their brethren in the provinces , but that on the contrary , that so hig h was the character in AA-hich Grand Lodge held them , that it ii'as felt they AA-ould

faithfully fulfil any covenant into which they might enter . Bro . MOTION' observed that the question was not Avhether they should lay aside all consideration of probable laAvsuits but Avhether they would eA-er get back their money . BRO . SY - . AIMONDS conceived that Bro . Motion ' s question had been already aiiSAvered by Bro . Mason . If the provincial brethren did not meet their engagements , the property could be sold , and AA'ould command in the market a price fully sufficient to repay the advance made b y

Grand Lodge . Bro . RICIIARDSOX , as the Master of a Provincial Lodge , said that tho brethren of that Lodge , of which thc Most AVorshipful Grand Master was himself a member , had purchaser ! tho building in AA-hich they met , but as they had not been able to raise by subscriptions the sum required for the purchase , they took the deeds and lodged them iu the hands of a brother , AVIIO , having that security , alloAved them tojhave the money which they required . If , then , a private member of the Craft

thought he might safely advance money upon such security , Grand Lodge might , he thought , fearlessly expect that whatever money it advanced would be faithfully repaid . A BIIOTHKB stated that he attended at the request of several provincial brethren to state that their vievA-s were entirely opposed to tho proposition . The brethren in the province to which he belonged ( Hampshire ) did not want an advance of money from Grand Lodge . Bro . H . BniDCKs said that he belonged to three distinct provinces , and he spoke the feeling of al 1 the brethren there iu supporting the original proposition .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 12
  • You're on page13
  • 14
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy