Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Magazine
  • March 1, 1878
  • Page 34
  • ON THE TESTING AND STRENGTH OF RAILWAY MATERIALS, &c.
Current:

The Masonic Magazine, March 1, 1878: Page 34

  • Back to The Masonic Magazine, March 1, 1878
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article ON THE TESTING AND STRENGTH OF RAILWAY MATERIALS, &c. Page 1 of 5 →
Page 34

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

On The Testing And Strength Of Railway Materials, &C.

ON THE TESTING AND STRENGTH OF RAILWAY MATERIALS , & c .

BY BRO . R . M . BANCROFT , Mem . Civil and Mechanical Engineers' Society . . MODES OF TESTING RAILS . THE usual modes of testing rails are : First , dead central weight or static test ; Secondd test b Third combination of first ancl second

, ynamic or y impact ; , a - first by the central ancl aftenvards by the falling load ; Fourth , chemical or acid test ; and Fifth , by rolling weight . To those might be added one of torsion 01 twisting . It should bo borne in mind that tests ought to be such as can at all times be easily applied , and not to cause unnecessary inconvenience to the contractor in carrying out his contract . Climate has great influence upon rails , for hi tropical countries a comparatively hard rail might be employed , ancl a greater amount of duty might probably be obtained than from a softer rail . In practise , any sleeper may be badly packed or decayed so as to offer little resistance , therefore it follows that a rail to be safe should not break or

take a permanent set under the weight of an engine ; if every other sleeper Avere taken away this would ahvays give a bearing at Avhich to test rails for different lines or gauges . A good steel rail , as used on the English Railways , will deflect about 3-16 of an inch in a span of 6 ft . Avhen a locomotive engine is passing over it . Taking the tests seriatim , it seems to me that the test by a falling Aveight is more to detect brittleness than a test of deflection ; and being a destructive one , only 1 or 2 per cent , of the quantities are

tested , and the rest of the turn is supposed to be like them . For the test of brittleness , it has been suggested that a good method Avould be to chop rails from a given heighth on to a hard platform , Avhich would certainly detect any cold short ones . To detect brittle rails is certainly most important , yet it is difficult to imagine how the loads passing over rails come with the suddenness of a MOAV from a test monkey . Some engineers say the endeavour to ascertain Avhether a rail has sufficient toughness by submitting it to the

action of a falling weight is most deceptive ; the test goes as far beyond the mark , as that by a dead Aveight faUs short of it , because it requires an amount of toughness which is cpiite unnecessary and inconsistent AA'ith a proper degree of hardness . Dead central Aveight tests determine the strength of a rail as a girder , ancl are adopted by some engineers , who consider nothing so good as the simple application gradually increasing bending stress to the centre , the deflection ancl set being noted after each successive increment of stress . These tests being usually made upon bearings , varying from 2 ft . Sin . up to 5 ft . and 6 ft „ it is a Question whether the amount of deflection

sliOAvn by so short a length of rail without being damaged by a permanent set , is no ' too small to be accurately measured ; ancl the difference of the deflection ivhich would be exhibited by a short piece of very good iron ancl a similar piece of very bad iron would , at any-rate , be very small to afford any certain gauge of its qualities . It would seem that a double test of dead wei ght and afterwards by impact is a severe and , one would think , a satisfactory one ; and , unlike a chemical test , is simple , quick , and inexineers

pensive ; it severely tests the qualities of material ancl workmanship . Some eng adopt this method , and , though these tests are not designed to represent the wear the rail would have to undergo , yet they are , combined , the safest and simplest that AVC know of at present to apply . The acid test is made by cutting off a slice from the end of a rail , and , after polishing , immersing it hi dilute acid , which eats away all ha * purities , leaving a lot of cavities and furroAvs , thus showing up the fibre or gram of tho metal very plainly . With most metals , chemical analysis is in itself a comp lete and sufficient test of quality , but not in steel . The toughness of steel may be altered hy sudden coolness ; aud , although the effect of this operation , and generally the effects of

“The Masonic Magazine: 1878-03-01, Page 34” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 23 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mmg/issues/mmg_01031878/page/34/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Monthly Masonic Summary. Article 1
AN HERMETIC WORK. Article 2
PAPERS ON THE GREAT PYRAMID. Article 6
WHAT MATTER? Article 13
THE ADVENTURES OF DON PASQUALE. Article 14
EXTRACTS FROM THE MINUTE BOOKS OF THE CARMARTHEN LODGE. Article 16
"WOUNDED." Article 18
THE WORK OF NATURE IN THE MONTHS. Article 19
AMABEL VAUGHAN.* Article 25
ALEXANDER PUSCHKIN. Article 27
THE ANGEL. Article 28
WHAT HAST THOU TO DO WITH MY POOR NAME ? Article 29
I LOVED THEE. Article 30
AN ELEGY. Article 30
A HEART. Article 30
THE ORIGIN AND REFERENCES OF THE HERMESIAN SPURIOUS FREEMASONRY. Article 31
FREEMASONS' WIVES. Article 33
ON THE TESTING AND STRENGTH OF RAILWAY MATERIALS, &c. Article 34
THE TRUE HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY IN ENGLAND. Article 38
LOST AND SAVED ; OR NELLIE POWERS THE MISSIONARY'S DAUGHTER. Article 41
NOTES ON LITERATURE, SCIENCE AND ART. Article 44
A STORY OF CHINESE LOVE. Article 48
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

1 Article
Page 8

Page 8

1 Article
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

1 Article
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

2 Articles
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 21

Page 21

1 Article
Page 22

Page 22

1 Article
Page 23

Page 23

1 Article
Page 24

Page 24

1 Article
Page 25

Page 25

2 Articles
Page 26

Page 26

1 Article
Page 27

Page 27

2 Articles
Page 28

Page 28

2 Articles
Page 29

Page 29

1 Article
Page 30

Page 30

3 Articles
Page 31

Page 31

2 Articles
Page 32

Page 32

1 Article
Page 33

Page 33

1 Article
Page 34

Page 34

1 Article
Page 35

Page 35

1 Article
Page 36

Page 36

1 Article
Page 37

Page 37

1 Article
Page 38

Page 38

2 Articles
Page 39

Page 39

1 Article
Page 40

Page 40

1 Article
Page 41

Page 41

2 Articles
Page 42

Page 42

1 Article
Page 43

Page 43

1 Article
Page 44

Page 44

2 Articles
Page 45

Page 45

1 Article
Page 46

Page 46

1 Article
Page 47

Page 47

1 Article
Page 48

Page 48

2 Articles
Page 34

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

On The Testing And Strength Of Railway Materials, &C.

ON THE TESTING AND STRENGTH OF RAILWAY MATERIALS , & c .

BY BRO . R . M . BANCROFT , Mem . Civil and Mechanical Engineers' Society . . MODES OF TESTING RAILS . THE usual modes of testing rails are : First , dead central weight or static test ; Secondd test b Third combination of first ancl second

, ynamic or y impact ; , a - first by the central ancl aftenvards by the falling load ; Fourth , chemical or acid test ; and Fifth , by rolling weight . To those might be added one of torsion 01 twisting . It should bo borne in mind that tests ought to be such as can at all times be easily applied , and not to cause unnecessary inconvenience to the contractor in carrying out his contract . Climate has great influence upon rails , for hi tropical countries a comparatively hard rail might be employed , ancl a greater amount of duty might probably be obtained than from a softer rail . In practise , any sleeper may be badly packed or decayed so as to offer little resistance , therefore it follows that a rail to be safe should not break or

take a permanent set under the weight of an engine ; if every other sleeper Avere taken away this would ahvays give a bearing at Avhich to test rails for different lines or gauges . A good steel rail , as used on the English Railways , will deflect about 3-16 of an inch in a span of 6 ft . Avhen a locomotive engine is passing over it . Taking the tests seriatim , it seems to me that the test by a falling Aveight is more to detect brittleness than a test of deflection ; and being a destructive one , only 1 or 2 per cent , of the quantities are

tested , and the rest of the turn is supposed to be like them . For the test of brittleness , it has been suggested that a good method Avould be to chop rails from a given heighth on to a hard platform , Avhich would certainly detect any cold short ones . To detect brittle rails is certainly most important , yet it is difficult to imagine how the loads passing over rails come with the suddenness of a MOAV from a test monkey . Some engineers say the endeavour to ascertain Avhether a rail has sufficient toughness by submitting it to the

action of a falling weight is most deceptive ; the test goes as far beyond the mark , as that by a dead Aveight faUs short of it , because it requires an amount of toughness which is cpiite unnecessary and inconsistent AA'ith a proper degree of hardness . Dead central Aveight tests determine the strength of a rail as a girder , ancl are adopted by some engineers , who consider nothing so good as the simple application gradually increasing bending stress to the centre , the deflection ancl set being noted after each successive increment of stress . These tests being usually made upon bearings , varying from 2 ft . Sin . up to 5 ft . and 6 ft „ it is a Question whether the amount of deflection

sliOAvn by so short a length of rail without being damaged by a permanent set , is no ' too small to be accurately measured ; ancl the difference of the deflection ivhich would be exhibited by a short piece of very good iron ancl a similar piece of very bad iron would , at any-rate , be very small to afford any certain gauge of its qualities . It would seem that a double test of dead wei ght and afterwards by impact is a severe and , one would think , a satisfactory one ; and , unlike a chemical test , is simple , quick , and inexineers

pensive ; it severely tests the qualities of material ancl workmanship . Some eng adopt this method , and , though these tests are not designed to represent the wear the rail would have to undergo , yet they are , combined , the safest and simplest that AVC know of at present to apply . The acid test is made by cutting off a slice from the end of a rail , and , after polishing , immersing it hi dilute acid , which eats away all ha * purities , leaving a lot of cavities and furroAvs , thus showing up the fibre or gram of tho metal very plainly . With most metals , chemical analysis is in itself a comp lete and sufficient test of quality , but not in steel . The toughness of steel may be altered hy sudden coolness ; aud , although the effect of this operation , and generally the effects of

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 33
  • You're on page34
  • 35
  • 48
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy