Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Illustrated
  • April 1, 1902
  • Page 10
  • Ad01000
Current:

The Masonic Illustrated, April 1, 1902: Page 10

  • Back to The Masonic Illustrated, April 1, 1902
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Article Physical Disability. Page 1 of 1
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ad01000

PERRIER=JOUET&Cos. CHAMPAGNES. FINEST VINTAGE RESERVE-CUVEES . THE FAVOURITE MASONIC BRAND . Agent—A . BOURSOT , 9 , Hart Street , Hark Lane , London .

Ad01002

fifKl ILLUSTRATED. wwwww ^ w ^ irw'W ^ iW'w ^ w ^ ww www w w w w ^ i- rlP

Physical Disability.

Physical Disability .

OF late years the physical qualifications ot candidates for the Degrees of Freemasonry have attracted a great deal of attention in the United States of America . Nor has the attention thus excited been unattended with controversy . The peaceful sway of the United Grand Lodge and the practical unanimity of the sister Grand

Lodges of the United Kingdom leave the English brethren to the enjoyment of a Masonic atmosphere unclouded by even such amicable contention as has been going on across the Atlantic with regard to the Doctrine of Physical Qualifications . But the discussion is not without interest for

Freemasons in the British Isles . In the first place , the arguments of the disputants are based on the clauses and provisions contained in the OLD CHARGES of British Freemasons . In the second place , the orthodox , or , at least , the more generally accepted theory and practice of our

Transatlantic Brethren on this question are not such as seem to us to be altogether warranted by a candid examination of all the circumstances that should determine us in the selection of members . Again , we must remember that the majority of

English-speaking Freemasons hail from the United States ; that they reckon amongst them some of the ablest Masonic jurists that grace the English tongue ; and that their zeal for Freemasonry is as unimpeachable as their ability . Hence , it is well that we should examine briefly how their position differs from ours on a question that may at any

moment challenge similar attention on this side of the Atlantic . On the one hand , the physical qualifications of candidates are held by our American brethren to be of such binding weight that they rank as an Ancient Landmark , not merely as

a general law or constitutional regulation . It is laid down in so many words by the most eminent of American Masonic jurists , that the Ancient Landmarks prescribe that " a candidate must be without blemish , and have the full and proper use of his limbs ; for a maimed man can do the Craft no good . "

And it is impossible to take up any report of the annual Communications of the various Grand Lodges of the United States without lighting upon some instance of a candidate being rejected for some trivial dismemberment , even for a missing finger-joint .

On the other hand , the Grand Lodge of England recognises no such physical Landmark , and throws on each individual lodge the responsibility of seeing that its candidates are fit to take their part in the work of the lodge , whether that work be symbolical or material . The law simply prescribes that the candidate must be a free man ,

of full age , and at the time of initiation in reputable circumstances . Let us now see what are the grounds on which the leaders of Masonic thought in America rest their contention that a candidate must be " without blemish . " Will it be

believed that they repose solely on the customs and requirements of Operative Masons in a bygone condition of Society ? We think we can fairly state the argument by the aid of the quotations we annex from the OLD CHARGKS . First in point of time comes the earliest of the prose

versions , dating from the days when the OLD CHARGKS had real weight and authority among the cathedral-builders of the 14 th century . We use the late Bro . Speth ' s rendering : " The sixth article is this . That no master from covetousness or for gain shall accept an apprentice that is unprofitable ; that is , having any maim ( or defect ) , by reason of which he is incapable of doing a mason's proper work . "

It would be inconsistent with our limits to trace the verbal charges and developments of this medieval article . Suffice it to say , that it duly appears , in one form or another , in Anderson ' s Coitsliliilioiis , 1723 ; Pennell ' s Dublin Coiislilnlions , 1730 ; and Dermott's Ahiman Rezon , 1756 ; the three prime sources whence all the Constitutions of all existing

Grand Lodges have been derived . Most of the American Grand Lodges took their original Constitutions , directly or indirectly , from the last-named source , in which the article appeared in the following form : — " No master should take an apprentice that is not the son of honest parentsa perfect

, youth without maim or defect in his body , and capable of learning the mysteries of the art , that the lords ( or founders ) may be well served , and the Craft not despised . . . . " It will be observed that in both these quotations , one

standing at the head of the OLD CHARGKS in point of antiquity , and the other inaugurating the system of independent American Grand Lodges four hundred years later , the nature of the defect , which was to operate as a bar , is plainly indicated . It was not every blemish that was to constitute a disability . It was a defect , in the words of

the fourteenth century CHARGE , " by reason of which he [ the entered apprentice ] is incapable of doing a mason ' s proper work . " Even in the days of Operative Masonry , minor bodily defects would not justify a master in refusing to take an otherwise strong and willing youth as an

apprentice . In order to put this beyond doubt , the reason for the limitation is assigned . A standard is set up whereby each individual case is to be judged , instead of a general prohibition excluding every candidate save " a perfect vouth . "

Thus the argument for rigid adherence to a supposed Landmark among medieval Operative Masons falls to the ground . The defect was to be estimated in relation to the work to be done . Let us maintain the usages of our forefathers in the Craft , and ascertain in the case of each candidate how any defect from which he may suffer would

affect the value of his work . The Speculative Freemason of to-day is no longer occupied in the construction of the magnificent piles of engineering Wisdom , pyramidal Strength , and architectural Beauty that exacted careful scrutiny into the physical capabilities of his ancestors in

the Craft . The task of to-day is on a higher plane , and exacts correspondingly higher qualifications , but of a different nature . Let us appraise the physical qualifications according to the standard set up by the OLD CHARGES , and see to it that every candidate whom we admit to

the Craft is fitted " to take his share in building up an edifice which shall display to full advantage the social , intellectual , and spiritual faculties with' which it has pleased the Great Architect of the Universe to endow him . " Then , indeed , shall the Craft be not despised , as the quaint old Craftsman puts it .

“The Masonic Illustrated: 1902-04-01, Page 10” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 15 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mil/issues/mil_01041902/page/10/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
Freemasonry in Victoria (Ausfralia). Article 2
United Grand Lodge of England. Article 6
Grand Mark Lodge. Article 7
Installation Meeting of the Eyre Lodge, No. 2742. Article 7
Emulation Lodge of Improvement. Article 8
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Physical Disability. Article 10
At the Sign of the Perfect Ashlar Article 11
Consecration of the Westminster City Council Lodge, No. 2882. Article 14
Consecration of the Willing Lodge, No. 2893. Article 14
"Are you a Mason?" Article 15
Installation Meeting of the Yorick Lodge, No. 2771. Article 16
"In Praise of Friendship." Article 17
Untitled Ad 17
History of the Emulation Lodge ofImprovement , No. 256.—— (Continued). Article 18
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

1 Article
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

1 Article
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

2 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

2 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

1 Article
Page 16

Page 16

1 Article
Page 17

Page 17

3 Articles
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ad01000

PERRIER=JOUET&Cos. CHAMPAGNES. FINEST VINTAGE RESERVE-CUVEES . THE FAVOURITE MASONIC BRAND . Agent—A . BOURSOT , 9 , Hart Street , Hark Lane , London .

Ad01002

fifKl ILLUSTRATED. wwwww ^ w ^ irw'W ^ iW'w ^ w ^ ww www w w w w ^ i- rlP

Physical Disability.

Physical Disability .

OF late years the physical qualifications ot candidates for the Degrees of Freemasonry have attracted a great deal of attention in the United States of America . Nor has the attention thus excited been unattended with controversy . The peaceful sway of the United Grand Lodge and the practical unanimity of the sister Grand

Lodges of the United Kingdom leave the English brethren to the enjoyment of a Masonic atmosphere unclouded by even such amicable contention as has been going on across the Atlantic with regard to the Doctrine of Physical Qualifications . But the discussion is not without interest for

Freemasons in the British Isles . In the first place , the arguments of the disputants are based on the clauses and provisions contained in the OLD CHARGES of British Freemasons . In the second place , the orthodox , or , at least , the more generally accepted theory and practice of our

Transatlantic Brethren on this question are not such as seem to us to be altogether warranted by a candid examination of all the circumstances that should determine us in the selection of members . Again , we must remember that the majority of

English-speaking Freemasons hail from the United States ; that they reckon amongst them some of the ablest Masonic jurists that grace the English tongue ; and that their zeal for Freemasonry is as unimpeachable as their ability . Hence , it is well that we should examine briefly how their position differs from ours on a question that may at any

moment challenge similar attention on this side of the Atlantic . On the one hand , the physical qualifications of candidates are held by our American brethren to be of such binding weight that they rank as an Ancient Landmark , not merely as

a general law or constitutional regulation . It is laid down in so many words by the most eminent of American Masonic jurists , that the Ancient Landmarks prescribe that " a candidate must be without blemish , and have the full and proper use of his limbs ; for a maimed man can do the Craft no good . "

And it is impossible to take up any report of the annual Communications of the various Grand Lodges of the United States without lighting upon some instance of a candidate being rejected for some trivial dismemberment , even for a missing finger-joint .

On the other hand , the Grand Lodge of England recognises no such physical Landmark , and throws on each individual lodge the responsibility of seeing that its candidates are fit to take their part in the work of the lodge , whether that work be symbolical or material . The law simply prescribes that the candidate must be a free man ,

of full age , and at the time of initiation in reputable circumstances . Let us now see what are the grounds on which the leaders of Masonic thought in America rest their contention that a candidate must be " without blemish . " Will it be

believed that they repose solely on the customs and requirements of Operative Masons in a bygone condition of Society ? We think we can fairly state the argument by the aid of the quotations we annex from the OLD CHARGKS . First in point of time comes the earliest of the prose

versions , dating from the days when the OLD CHARGKS had real weight and authority among the cathedral-builders of the 14 th century . We use the late Bro . Speth ' s rendering : " The sixth article is this . That no master from covetousness or for gain shall accept an apprentice that is unprofitable ; that is , having any maim ( or defect ) , by reason of which he is incapable of doing a mason's proper work . "

It would be inconsistent with our limits to trace the verbal charges and developments of this medieval article . Suffice it to say , that it duly appears , in one form or another , in Anderson ' s Coitsliliilioiis , 1723 ; Pennell ' s Dublin Coiislilnlions , 1730 ; and Dermott's Ahiman Rezon , 1756 ; the three prime sources whence all the Constitutions of all existing

Grand Lodges have been derived . Most of the American Grand Lodges took their original Constitutions , directly or indirectly , from the last-named source , in which the article appeared in the following form : — " No master should take an apprentice that is not the son of honest parentsa perfect

, youth without maim or defect in his body , and capable of learning the mysteries of the art , that the lords ( or founders ) may be well served , and the Craft not despised . . . . " It will be observed that in both these quotations , one

standing at the head of the OLD CHARGKS in point of antiquity , and the other inaugurating the system of independent American Grand Lodges four hundred years later , the nature of the defect , which was to operate as a bar , is plainly indicated . It was not every blemish that was to constitute a disability . It was a defect , in the words of

the fourteenth century CHARGE , " by reason of which he [ the entered apprentice ] is incapable of doing a mason ' s proper work . " Even in the days of Operative Masonry , minor bodily defects would not justify a master in refusing to take an otherwise strong and willing youth as an

apprentice . In order to put this beyond doubt , the reason for the limitation is assigned . A standard is set up whereby each individual case is to be judged , instead of a general prohibition excluding every candidate save " a perfect vouth . "

Thus the argument for rigid adherence to a supposed Landmark among medieval Operative Masons falls to the ground . The defect was to be estimated in relation to the work to be done . Let us maintain the usages of our forefathers in the Craft , and ascertain in the case of each candidate how any defect from which he may suffer would

affect the value of his work . The Speculative Freemason of to-day is no longer occupied in the construction of the magnificent piles of engineering Wisdom , pyramidal Strength , and architectural Beauty that exacted careful scrutiny into the physical capabilities of his ancestors in

the Craft . The task of to-day is on a higher plane , and exacts correspondingly higher qualifications , but of a different nature . Let us appraise the physical qualifications according to the standard set up by the OLD CHARGES , and see to it that every candidate whom we admit to

the Craft is fitted " to take his share in building up an edifice which shall display to full advantage the social , intellectual , and spiritual faculties with' which it has pleased the Great Architect of the Universe to endow him . " Then , indeed , shall the Craft be not despised , as the quaint old Craftsman puts it .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 9
  • You're on page10
  • 11
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy