Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Masonic Illustrated
  • Jan. 1, 1903
  • Page 10
  • Ad01002
Current:

The Masonic Illustrated, Jan. 1, 1903: Page 10

  • Back to The Masonic Illustrated, Jan. 1, 1903
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Ad Untitled Page 1 of 1
    Article The Roman Catholic Hierarchy and Masonry from Early Times to 1814. Page 1 of 1
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ad01001

LONDON , N . W . Hotel , Grand Midland Venetian for Masonic Rooms Dinners now available , etc . Other Midland Railway Hotels at Liverpool , Leeds , Bradford , Derby , Morecombe , and Heysham . Chief Office : W . TOWLE , Midland Grand Hotel , Manager . London , N . W . M . R . Hotels , etc .

Ad01002

PERRIER = JOUET & Cos . CHAMPAGNES . FINEST VINTAGE RESERVE-CUVEES . THE FAVOURITE MASONIC BRAND . Agent—A . BOURSOT , 9 , Hart Street , flark Lane , London .

Ad01003

ASSURANCE . EXCHANGE ROYAL INCORPORATED A . D . 1720 . Funds in Hand Exceed - - £ 4 f 850 , 000 Claims Paid Exceed - - , £ 41 , 000 , 000 UNIMPEA CHADLE SECURITY . FIRE , LIFE , MARINE , ANNUITIES , ACCIDENTS , BURGLARY , EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY . Applv for full Prospectus lo \ V . N . WHYMPHR , Secretary . Head Office-. —ROYAL EXCHANGE , LONDON , E . C .

Ad01004

THE MASONIC ILLUSTRATED ' yy >> yy X K v 5 X K ^^ JJC ^ S' ^ S'J ' vSK S # J & y & y & y & i & ol &' & !& iPt

The Roman Catholic Hierarchy And Masonry From Early Times To 1814.

The Roman Catholic Hierarchy and Masonry from Early Times to 1814 .

IT is a commonly received opinion that the Church of Rome is opposed to all secret societies . However widespread the opinion may be , it does not seem to be supported by history or by the practice of the Roman Church . One notable instance of a secret society which for many

years controlled the Papacy and met with the approval of that Church is the Society of Jesus , whose members , under the name of Jesuits , have played so important a part in the development and introduction of many of her doctrines and methods .

The researches of Findel have established that the Steinmetzen associations , the operative Masons of Germany , were branches of a secret society , with objects as clearly ¦ delined as those of speculative Masonry in the present day . Yet we know that these societies were under Papal

protection in the fifteenth century . The Bulls of Alexander VI ., 1 5 , and of Leo X ., 1517 , in support of Freemasonry , have often been referred to by Masonic historians , though it must be admitted that a careful search through the Archives ¦ of the Vatican has failed to discover any trace of their

¦ existence . This much , however , is certain , that with Papal . approval , or at any rate without expression of disapproval from the ruling members of the Roman Hierarchy in the year 1 279 , Archbishop Sifrid , of Cologne , promised full ¦ absolution to all who should , for the furthering of the cathedral building operations , present to him any wrongfully . acquired goods .

The cause of the hostility of the Roman Hierarchy t ° Freemasonry is not due therefore to the mere fact of its being a secret society . What then could have caused this hostility ? The Bull of Benedict XII ., 173 8 , does not allege any offences against Freemasons , it condemns them merely on the ground that " their impregnable secret " may be used

for improper purposes . This reasoning would have applied much more forcibly to the Jesuits , who were then in favour at Rome , than to the Freemasons . The real reason of this sudden enmity was the discovery that men of different faiths could unite in the brotherhood of

Freemasonry . It was in 1737 that , at the lodge of Livorno , Roman Catholics , Protestants , and Jews enrolled themselves asmembers . The inestimable advantages of the institution in promoting tolerance and bringing within the bounds of possibility the establishment of a nearly universal human

brotherhood , were , in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church , dangerous tendencies and irreligious doctrines . This church attacked Freemasonry not because it was a secret society , not because she had any real belief that the science aimed at the subversion of established governments

or religion , but because she feared the intercourse of her adherents with persons of other religions , and dreaded that the kind of study recommended by the science would weaken the influence and authority of her priests . Accordingly , in countries where the Pope had supreme

control , Freemasonry was put down with a strong hand . In Portugal , " that paradise of the monks , that seat of ignorance and superstition , " the tortures of the inquisition were invoked to suppress the Brotherhood . In Spain the same means were resorted to . In Austria Freemasonry was

practically suppressed . In France , though Freemasonry was for a short time discouraged , the authorities never really attempted to suppress it ; and not long after 1737 we lind many of the chief men of the kingdom serving under its banner .

In England the Papal policy adopted towards Freemasonry was different . It is quite clear that the Roman Catholic authorities for many years after 1737 did not really forbid the members of their Church from joining the Society . We find among the Grand Masters the names of the Duke of Norfolk , 1730 , Lord Petre , 1772-1776 , and other well

known members of that faith . It is hardly likely that the less illustrious members of that Church were prohibited from joining the Order . It is , at first sight , difficult to understand the exceptional indulgence extended to English and Scotch Freemasons . It

may be that for some years the Papacy hoped to convert the institution into a society friendly to the Stuarts , and to use it in attempting to replace a Roman Catholic dynasty on the throne of Britain . Indeed , one authority has gone so far as to assert that some of the higher degrees were established to

effect this very purpose . Possibly Roman Catholics in Britain were allowed to join on the chance that they would be able to influence the Order in case of any attempted revolution . However this may be , no serious attempt to discourage Freemasonry in Britain was made by the see of Rome until the 19 th century .

The Bull published by Benedict XIV . in 1751 did not affect the view taken in Britain by the Roman Catholic authorities on the practice of Freemasonry . This precious document gives six reasons why Freemasonry should be held accursed . First and foremost , it is laid down that the fact

that all sorts of sects and religions are allowed to join the Order proves how pernicious such an association must be " to the purity of the Catholic Religion . " The fact that Masonry is a secret society is only thrown in as a sort of makeweight . It appears to have had some effect on the Continent , and was finally the means of suppressing Freemasonry in Austria .

After this date , the hostility to Freemasonry , though undoubtedly still existing , appear to have gradually become less insistent , till 1814 , when the ( lames of intolerance were again fanned into renewed activity , We will deal with the cause of this and the present attitude of the Papacy towards our Society in our next issue .

“The Masonic Illustrated: 1903-01-01, Page 10” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 15 May 2025, django:8000/periodicals/mil/issues/mil_01011903/page/10/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
Untitled Article 1
The City's Sheriffs. Article 2
United Grand Lodge of England. Article 3
Consecration of the Richard Clowes Lodge, No. 2936. Article 3
Consecration of the King Alfred Lodge, No. 2945. Article 5
Consecration of the Lambeth Borough Council Lodge, No. 2941. Article 6
Installation Meeting of the Piccadilly Lodge, No. 2550. Article 7
Installation Meeting of the Cannon Lodge, No. 1539. Article 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 9
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
Untitled Ad 10
The Roman Catholic Hierarchy and Masonry from Early Times to 1814. Article 10
At the Sign of the Perfect Ashlar Article 11
Consecration of the Queen Alexandra Lodge, No. 2932. Article 14
Old Tracing Boards. Article 15
A Veteran Knights Templar. Article 16
Installation Meeting of the Port Natal Lodge, No. 738. Article 16
Lodge Summonses. Article 17
History of the Emulation Lod ge of Improvement, No . 256.——(Continued). Article 18
Page 1

Page 1

1 Article
Page 2

Page 2

1 Article
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

1 Article
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

4 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

1 Article
Page 10

Page 10

5 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

1 Article
Page 12

Page 12

1 Article
Page 13

Page 13

1 Article
Page 14

Page 14

1 Article
Page 15

Page 15

2 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

2 Articles
Page 17

Page 17

1 Article
Page 18

Page 18

1 Article
Page 19

Page 19

1 Article
Page 20

Page 20

1 Article
Page 10

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Ad01001

LONDON , N . W . Hotel , Grand Midland Venetian for Masonic Rooms Dinners now available , etc . Other Midland Railway Hotels at Liverpool , Leeds , Bradford , Derby , Morecombe , and Heysham . Chief Office : W . TOWLE , Midland Grand Hotel , Manager . London , N . W . M . R . Hotels , etc .

Ad01002

PERRIER = JOUET & Cos . CHAMPAGNES . FINEST VINTAGE RESERVE-CUVEES . THE FAVOURITE MASONIC BRAND . Agent—A . BOURSOT , 9 , Hart Street , flark Lane , London .

Ad01003

ASSURANCE . EXCHANGE ROYAL INCORPORATED A . D . 1720 . Funds in Hand Exceed - - £ 4 f 850 , 000 Claims Paid Exceed - - , £ 41 , 000 , 000 UNIMPEA CHADLE SECURITY . FIRE , LIFE , MARINE , ANNUITIES , ACCIDENTS , BURGLARY , EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY . Applv for full Prospectus lo \ V . N . WHYMPHR , Secretary . Head Office-. —ROYAL EXCHANGE , LONDON , E . C .

Ad01004

THE MASONIC ILLUSTRATED ' yy >> yy X K v 5 X K ^^ JJC ^ S' ^ S'J ' vSK S # J & y & y & y & i & ol &' & !& iPt

The Roman Catholic Hierarchy And Masonry From Early Times To 1814.

The Roman Catholic Hierarchy and Masonry from Early Times to 1814 .

IT is a commonly received opinion that the Church of Rome is opposed to all secret societies . However widespread the opinion may be , it does not seem to be supported by history or by the practice of the Roman Church . One notable instance of a secret society which for many

years controlled the Papacy and met with the approval of that Church is the Society of Jesus , whose members , under the name of Jesuits , have played so important a part in the development and introduction of many of her doctrines and methods .

The researches of Findel have established that the Steinmetzen associations , the operative Masons of Germany , were branches of a secret society , with objects as clearly ¦ delined as those of speculative Masonry in the present day . Yet we know that these societies were under Papal

protection in the fifteenth century . The Bulls of Alexander VI ., 1 5 , and of Leo X ., 1517 , in support of Freemasonry , have often been referred to by Masonic historians , though it must be admitted that a careful search through the Archives ¦ of the Vatican has failed to discover any trace of their

¦ existence . This much , however , is certain , that with Papal . approval , or at any rate without expression of disapproval from the ruling members of the Roman Hierarchy in the year 1 279 , Archbishop Sifrid , of Cologne , promised full ¦ absolution to all who should , for the furthering of the cathedral building operations , present to him any wrongfully . acquired goods .

The cause of the hostility of the Roman Hierarchy t ° Freemasonry is not due therefore to the mere fact of its being a secret society . What then could have caused this hostility ? The Bull of Benedict XII ., 173 8 , does not allege any offences against Freemasons , it condemns them merely on the ground that " their impregnable secret " may be used

for improper purposes . This reasoning would have applied much more forcibly to the Jesuits , who were then in favour at Rome , than to the Freemasons . The real reason of this sudden enmity was the discovery that men of different faiths could unite in the brotherhood of

Freemasonry . It was in 1737 that , at the lodge of Livorno , Roman Catholics , Protestants , and Jews enrolled themselves asmembers . The inestimable advantages of the institution in promoting tolerance and bringing within the bounds of possibility the establishment of a nearly universal human

brotherhood , were , in the eyes of the Roman Catholic Church , dangerous tendencies and irreligious doctrines . This church attacked Freemasonry not because it was a secret society , not because she had any real belief that the science aimed at the subversion of established governments

or religion , but because she feared the intercourse of her adherents with persons of other religions , and dreaded that the kind of study recommended by the science would weaken the influence and authority of her priests . Accordingly , in countries where the Pope had supreme

control , Freemasonry was put down with a strong hand . In Portugal , " that paradise of the monks , that seat of ignorance and superstition , " the tortures of the inquisition were invoked to suppress the Brotherhood . In Spain the same means were resorted to . In Austria Freemasonry was

practically suppressed . In France , though Freemasonry was for a short time discouraged , the authorities never really attempted to suppress it ; and not long after 1737 we lind many of the chief men of the kingdom serving under its banner .

In England the Papal policy adopted towards Freemasonry was different . It is quite clear that the Roman Catholic authorities for many years after 1737 did not really forbid the members of their Church from joining the Society . We find among the Grand Masters the names of the Duke of Norfolk , 1730 , Lord Petre , 1772-1776 , and other well

known members of that faith . It is hardly likely that the less illustrious members of that Church were prohibited from joining the Order . It is , at first sight , difficult to understand the exceptional indulgence extended to English and Scotch Freemasons . It

may be that for some years the Papacy hoped to convert the institution into a society friendly to the Stuarts , and to use it in attempting to replace a Roman Catholic dynasty on the throne of Britain . Indeed , one authority has gone so far as to assert that some of the higher degrees were established to

effect this very purpose . Possibly Roman Catholics in Britain were allowed to join on the chance that they would be able to influence the Order in case of any attempted revolution . However this may be , no serious attempt to discourage Freemasonry in Britain was made by the see of Rome until the 19 th century .

The Bull published by Benedict XIV . in 1751 did not affect the view taken in Britain by the Roman Catholic authorities on the practice of Freemasonry . This precious document gives six reasons why Freemasonry should be held accursed . First and foremost , it is laid down that the fact

that all sorts of sects and religions are allowed to join the Order proves how pernicious such an association must be " to the purity of the Catholic Religion . " The fact that Masonry is a secret society is only thrown in as a sort of makeweight . It appears to have had some effect on the Continent , and was finally the means of suppressing Freemasonry in Austria .

After this date , the hostility to Freemasonry , though undoubtedly still existing , appear to have gradually become less insistent , till 1814 , when the ( lames of intolerance were again fanned into renewed activity , We will deal with the cause of this and the present attitude of the Papacy towards our Society in our next issue .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 9
  • You're on page10
  • 11
  • 20
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy