Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason
  • March 20, 1880
  • Page 7
  • Original Correspondence.
Current:

The Freemason, March 20, 1880: Page 7

  • Back to The Freemason, March 20, 1880
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article THE FREEMASON. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 2
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 2
    Article Original Correspondence. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 7

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Freemason.

butcher , and one accountant . Of these cases sixteen are London and sixty-three provincial and colonial .

* * So many reckless statements have been made , so many unwise remarks put forward in re- the "Bitual Question , " that we feel sure we are exercising a wise discretion , in the best interests of Masonry , and meeting the wishes of

many zealous friends , in keeping for the future the the subject altogether out of the columns of the Freemason . Wc shall not henceforth encourage any discussion as to " what is this use" or " what is t ' other , " or " what is correct" or what is " vice versa . "

* * MANY objections are made to a Masonic press , mainly on the ground of the publication of " aporreta , " of things which only concern the lodge , and ought not to be dealt wiih out of

lodge . No one who has not had to do with the conducting of a Masonic paper , especially in this age of free discussion , —and following the bad example originally set , be it remembered , by Dr

Oliver , —can realize the difficulty of excision or suppression . But we fully admit we have long felt that " ritually " we are publishing far too much , and greatly against the laws of Masonry and even good taste .

Original Correspondence.

Original Correspondence .

[ Wf . do r . ot hold ourselves responsible for , or even approving of , the opinions expressed by our correspondents , but we wish in * spirit of fair play to all , to permit—within cerfatn necessary limits—free discussion . ]

BRO . J . B . MONCKTON . To the Eilitor of the "Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , To answer individually the mass of congratulatory letters I have received and am receiving from brethren

all over thc country , except in the unworthy form or a circular , is impossible within the limits of time that courtesy would prescribe . Allow me to say in your columns how very much I appreciate the " Hearty good wishes " thus conveyed . I am , faithfully and fraternally yours ,

JOHN B . MONCKTON . Queen Anne ' s Mansion , Queen Anne ' s Gate , S . W . 18 th March . QUALIFICATIONS OF A GRAND TREASURER .

To thc hdttor qf the " Fi cemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Referring to a letter from " Lex " on the qualifications of a Grand Treasurer , I think it might be well just to point out that for a salaried official of the Craft , for such I take Bro . Binekes to be , to bring forward any motion whatever in Grand Lodge is a very great impropriety , as it

shows that he , ami in a less degree thc brother who seconded his proposition ( and whom I was very sorry to sec did so ) , fail to understand tbe relation in which they stand to the Craft at large . They are its servants , and as such have no business to express opinions unless they are called upon to do so , and then only upon their own

special subjects . I am , yours fraternally , S . M . M . C . O . [ We publish this leltcr on the principle of " free discussion , " always upheld in the Freemason , but we note that " Lex ' s " letter alluded only to " principles-, " this letter bears rather on " persons " and not principles . See our remarks in leader . —En . ]

CORRF . CTION . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Kindly correct the following misprint which appears in my letter in your last issue , viz ., in the third paragraph , eighth line , read " Board of Past Blasters " instead of " Board of Installed Masters . " Yours fraternally ,

MANCUNIUM . March i sth .

MASONIC RHGALIA . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Can you or any of your correspondents inform me why Masters and Past Masters disregard the instructions contained in the last paragraph on page 125 in our Book of Constitutions ?

It is there stated , " The Masters and Past Masters of lodges to wear in the place of the three rosettes on the Master Mason ' s apron perpendicular lines upon horizontal lines , thereby forming three several sets of two right angles , the length of the horizontal lines to be two inches-and-ahalf each and of the perpendicular lines one each ; these emblems to be of rill-on , half-an-inch broad , and of the

same colour as the lining and edging of the apron . " At the last Quarterly Communication I noticed that , instead of conforming to these simple instructions , at the least computation , 80 per cent , of the brethren wore on their aprons chased initial emblems . A notice has been issued by Grand Lodge relating to certain irregularities which have taken place with respect

Original Correspondence.

to the Charity jewel , but tbe point I have raised appears to have escaped attention . The matter may not be of very great importance , but as we have a rule to guide us , would it not be better to adhere to it ? Yours fraternally , P . M . 176 S , 421 , & c .

ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCE FUND . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — I have pleasure in sending you a list of amounts subscribed to the Royal Masonic Pupils' Assistance Fund

to the present time ; also copy of a letter from Bro . Meggy , both of which I shall be glad to see published in the next issue oE your paper . Yours fraternally , DICK RADCLYFFE . 129 , High Holboin , London , W . C , nth March .

ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCL FUND . 1 ith March , 1880 . The following is a list of the amounts subscribed : — DONATIONS . £ s . d . H . R . H . the Prince of Wales ... ... 26 5 o H . R . H . the Duke of Connaught ... 20 o o

H . R . H . Prince Leopold ... ... to a o Rosslyn , Right Hon . tbe Earl of ... ... 26 3 o Clarke , Hyde ... ... ... 10 10 o Egerton , the Hon . Wilbraham , M . P . ... 10 10 o Ferrieres , Baron de ... ... ... 10 10 o Guest , Montague J . ... ... ... 10 10 o

Martyn , Rev . C . J . ... ... ... 10 10 o Tew , T . W ., J . D . ... 5 5 ° Adams , Herbert J . ... ... ... 500 Bagshawe , Rev . Agustus H . ... ... 5 5 ° Barfield , A . ... ... ... 110 Blackburn , George ... ... ... 10 10 o

Bodenham , J . ... ... ... 5 5 o Clarke , Stephenson ... ... ... 10 o o Constable , J ohn ... . . ... 10 10 o Cronin , D . ... ... ... 5 5 o Cronin , F . ... ... ... 5 3 o Cousins . C . ... ... ... 160

Davy , C . R . ... ... ... 1 1 o Gibb , T . Eccleston ... ... ... 10 10 o Godfrey , Henry ... ... . . 5 5 ° Greenfield , John ... ... ... 5 S ° Higham , P . ... ... ... 13 13 o Higham , Mrs . P . ... ... ... 5 1 °

Hopekirk , W . ... ... ... 1 1 o Howkins , Thomas ... ' " ... ... 1 1 o Jacobs , J . ... ... ... 3 S o James , W . H . ... ... ... 1 1 o Johnson , E . ... ... ... 5 5 o Mortis , Rev . R . ... ... ... 1 1 o

Neilson , James Horner ... ... 5 c o Pears , Andrew ... ... ... 5 5 ° Robinson , Rev . George ... ... too Short , Rev . W . F . ... ... ... 5 5 o Spice , R . P . ... . ... ... 500 Storr , E . F . ... ... ... 550

Wentworth , T . J . ... ... ... e 5 o Winkfield , A . P . ... ... ... s 5 o Woodward , E . C . ... ... ... 10 10 o Woodward , Mrs . E . C . ... ... 10 10 o Anness , S . R . ... ... ... 250 Morgan , jun ., W . W , ... ... ... 10 10 o

Radclyffe , Dick ... ... ... 20 o o The Provincial Grand Lodge of Hampshire and the fsle of Wight ... ... 10 10 o Lewis Lodge , No . 1185 , Wood Green ... 5 5 ° Lodge of _ Economy , No . ; 6 , Winchester ... 5 e , o

£ 377 1 ° ° Donations ( as above ) ... ... £ 377 10 o Annual subscriptions ( as other list ) ... 27 9 6 £ 404 19 6 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTIONS . £ s . d . Hickman , W . ... ... ... 1 1 o

Ayling , T . ... ... ... 1 1 o Bagshawe , Rev . Augustus A . ... ... 1 1 o Challen , Charles ... ... ... 1 1 o Davy , C . R . ... ... ... 110 Eynon , R . ... ... ... o 10 o Frere , E . T . o e o

Godfrey , Henry ... ... ... 1 t o Hodges , H . Howard ... ... ... 110 Hopper , W . ... ... ... o 10 o Johnson , H . J . ... ... ... 1 1 o Miskin , II . ... ... ... o 10 o Petts , E . J . 1 1 o

Pollitzer , S . ... ... ... 1 1 o Ravenshaw , Rev . F . F . ... ... 1 1 o Shaw , Rev . R . D . ... .. ... 1 1 o Smith , H . R . Cooper ... ... ... 1 1 o Snelling , W . Walton ... ... ... 1 1 o Taylor , T . ... ... ... 1 1 o

Thiellay , E . H . ... ... ... 0106 Wentworth , T . G . ... ... ... 220 Adair Lodge , No . 936 , Aldborough ... 1 1 o Lord Warden Lodge , No . 1096 , Deal ... 1 1 o St . Luke ' s Lodge , No . 225 , Ipswich . „ 220 Tranquillity Lodge , No . 185 , London ... 3 3 o

£ 27 9 6 22 , Bedford Place , Russell-square , London , W . C , nth March , 1880 . 1 hereby certify that I have examined the receipt books

Original Correspondence.

of the Royal Masonic Pupils' Assistance Fund and compared them with the bankers' pass book , and that the total receipts to this date amount to £ 110 2 s . ( say one hundred and ten pounds two shillings ) , of which £ 108 6 s . is paid into the bank , as well as a country cheque for £ 1 is ., and that 15 s . has been received in postage stamps .

( Signed ) THOMAS MEGGY , Public Accountant . Rev . C . J . Martyn announced at the meeting that nothing had been drawn out from the bank . D . RADCLYFFE .

7 b the . Editor of thc " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — I am glad to see that the promoters of the new Charity Fund have published a list of sub ; criptions and donations , which is satisfactory ; the difference between the total and the amount paid into the bank would , I presume ,

be accounted for by sums not yet paid . It would have completed the satisfaction of that large section of the public who are always " wanting to know " if a statement of the liabilities that bad been incurred up to the date of the meeting had also been published . Yours fraternally , P . M .

To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — It will have been seen by your report , that when I challenged the proposals of this expansive " fund " I was met with cries of " No , no . " In the interests of truth , I beg to inform you that in the hands of those who cried " No , no" was a list of the supposed necessities of the

pupils who leave the Masonic Boys' School , and this list distinctly laid down that the proposed " fund" was to stand as the parent and guardian , not only to the youths , but even to watch over them "through life , " to find them the means of learning professions , of actually " later in life" ( I quote the exact words of the programme ) purchasing businesses for them , and of creating scholarships ,

maintaining them at universities , and of " obtaining" for them commissions in the army and navy . Your faithful report of the proceedings will show that thc proposals were not even " damned with faint praise , " for the common sense of every one plainly expressed that , when not Quixotic , the proposals were idiotic . There is one point to which I should like to call Lord

Rosslyn ' s attention . He expressed his astonishment at the proposals , and virtually withdrew from them . I was aghast at hearing this , for I had received a circular in which I was particularly requested to favour " Lord Rosslyn personally , " by allowing my name to appear as a supporter of the proposed " fund . " Having a keen sense of the great responsibility attached to those who start a new

" Charity , " I had no idea of connecting myself with any cut and dried organisation , in which , as I have seen before , all the Committee are merely so many puppets for some clever manipulator to conjure with ; but it is worth while directing Lord Rosslyn ' s attention to the fact that the large " Committee " appear to have given their names because they were ? iven to understand that Lord Rosslyn

" personally" desired them to assist him in doing some charitable work which he thought necessary to be done . It is now seen that the extent of the work is to assist a few boys who may be friendless . The question is , how far any boys can be absolutely Iriendless when they have conquered the difficulty of an election to a Charity like the Masonic Boys' School . To attain this initial success in

life requires many and influential friends , and if the education given in the School does not fit the boy at sixteen to commence the start in life , well , then I consider it is so much the worse tor the School , and that it is time to consider whether a less expensive and more useful education could not be given—an education which would not be " wasted . " When a school so educates the boys that

on the threshold of life they are helpless unless a new " fund " is created to carry them on to universities , and to " obtain " for them commissions in the army or navy , it is time to consider whether the whole itself is not a mistake . Then , too , what about the Masonic girls ? Is there to be a similar " fund " for the girls , to provide thrm with marriage portions ; to look after them through life ; to sec to

the vaccination of their children , & c . & c , & c . ; to stand in the position of mothers-in-law to litem , simply because they , like the boys , were lucky enough to commence their career in life with many friends who voted them into the School , and then were cruel enough to desert them , leaving them still dependent upon the Masonic brotherhood ? We want no such "fund . " If there are any cases which

require help , it will be forthcoming , but we want no lrrationably enthusiastic brothers advocating that we should go without great coats for a winter , or breakfasts three times a week , or installation banquets , and other means of " saving , " in order to endow with the blessings of a paid Secretariat a new fund with a charity-run-mad programme . Yours faithfully and fraternally , JOHN WHILE , P . M . 228 .

MASONIC CHARITY . The following appears in Saturday ' s Times . To the Editor of the " Times . " Sir , —Reading thc paragraph hereon in Thc Times of today , I beg the favour of a few words . A very old Mason myself and an ardent supporter of our Benevolent Institutions , I earnestly deprecate this new

movement as unnecessary and uncalled for . Lord Rosslyn ' s good-natured remarks a year or two since have heen strained into far more than was intended , and a little personal vanity has done thc rest . Anything in the semblance of a fourth charity will inevitably damage the three that exist and prosper , and I trust that those high in the Craft who have kindly , but ,

“The Freemason: 1880-03-20, Page 7” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 13 April 2026, django:8000/periodicals/fvl/issues/fvl_20031880/page/7/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
CONTENTS. Article 1
REPORTS OF MASONIC MEETINGS. Article 1
Royal Arch. Article 3
Mark Masonry. Article 3
Knights Templar. Article 3
Order of St. Lawrence. Article 4
North Africa. Article 4
LAYING THE FOUNDATION STONE OF A MASONIC TEMPLE IN CANTERBURY. Article 4
ACCOUNT OF MASONIC EMBLEMS AT THE BASE OF CLEOPATRA'S NEEDLE. Article 5
PROVINCIAL GRAND CHAPTER OF MONMOUTHSHIRE.. Article 5
Reviews. Article 5
To Correspondents. Article 6
Births, Marriages, and Deaths. Article 6
PERMANENT ENLARGEMENT OF THE "FREEMASON." Article 6
KENNING'S MASONIC CYCLOPÆDIA. Article 6
THE FREEMASON. Article 6
Original Correspondence. Article 7
Masonic Notes and Queries. Article 8
Untitled Article 8
Untitled Article 9
Obituary. Article 9
Masonic and General Tidings. Article 9
METROPOLITAN MASONIC MEETINGS Article 10
MASONIC MEETINGS IN EAST LANCASHIRE. Article 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 11
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Untitled Ad 12
Page 1

Page 1

4 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

6 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

6 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

5 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

6 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

5 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

6 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

15 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

16 Articles
Page 7

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

The Freemason.

butcher , and one accountant . Of these cases sixteen are London and sixty-three provincial and colonial .

* * So many reckless statements have been made , so many unwise remarks put forward in re- the "Bitual Question , " that we feel sure we are exercising a wise discretion , in the best interests of Masonry , and meeting the wishes of

many zealous friends , in keeping for the future the the subject altogether out of the columns of the Freemason . Wc shall not henceforth encourage any discussion as to " what is this use" or " what is t ' other , " or " what is correct" or what is " vice versa . "

* * MANY objections are made to a Masonic press , mainly on the ground of the publication of " aporreta , " of things which only concern the lodge , and ought not to be dealt wiih out of

lodge . No one who has not had to do with the conducting of a Masonic paper , especially in this age of free discussion , —and following the bad example originally set , be it remembered , by Dr

Oliver , —can realize the difficulty of excision or suppression . But we fully admit we have long felt that " ritually " we are publishing far too much , and greatly against the laws of Masonry and even good taste .

Original Correspondence.

Original Correspondence .

[ Wf . do r . ot hold ourselves responsible for , or even approving of , the opinions expressed by our correspondents , but we wish in * spirit of fair play to all , to permit—within cerfatn necessary limits—free discussion . ]

BRO . J . B . MONCKTON . To the Eilitor of the "Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , To answer individually the mass of congratulatory letters I have received and am receiving from brethren

all over thc country , except in the unworthy form or a circular , is impossible within the limits of time that courtesy would prescribe . Allow me to say in your columns how very much I appreciate the " Hearty good wishes " thus conveyed . I am , faithfully and fraternally yours ,

JOHN B . MONCKTON . Queen Anne ' s Mansion , Queen Anne ' s Gate , S . W . 18 th March . QUALIFICATIONS OF A GRAND TREASURER .

To thc hdttor qf the " Fi cemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Referring to a letter from " Lex " on the qualifications of a Grand Treasurer , I think it might be well just to point out that for a salaried official of the Craft , for such I take Bro . Binekes to be , to bring forward any motion whatever in Grand Lodge is a very great impropriety , as it

shows that he , ami in a less degree thc brother who seconded his proposition ( and whom I was very sorry to sec did so ) , fail to understand tbe relation in which they stand to the Craft at large . They are its servants , and as such have no business to express opinions unless they are called upon to do so , and then only upon their own

special subjects . I am , yours fraternally , S . M . M . C . O . [ We publish this leltcr on the principle of " free discussion , " always upheld in the Freemason , but we note that " Lex ' s " letter alluded only to " principles-, " this letter bears rather on " persons " and not principles . See our remarks in leader . —En . ]

CORRF . CTION . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Kindly correct the following misprint which appears in my letter in your last issue , viz ., in the third paragraph , eighth line , read " Board of Past Blasters " instead of " Board of Installed Masters . " Yours fraternally ,

MANCUNIUM . March i sth .

MASONIC RHGALIA . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — Can you or any of your correspondents inform me why Masters and Past Masters disregard the instructions contained in the last paragraph on page 125 in our Book of Constitutions ?

It is there stated , " The Masters and Past Masters of lodges to wear in the place of the three rosettes on the Master Mason ' s apron perpendicular lines upon horizontal lines , thereby forming three several sets of two right angles , the length of the horizontal lines to be two inches-and-ahalf each and of the perpendicular lines one each ; these emblems to be of rill-on , half-an-inch broad , and of the

same colour as the lining and edging of the apron . " At the last Quarterly Communication I noticed that , instead of conforming to these simple instructions , at the least computation , 80 per cent , of the brethren wore on their aprons chased initial emblems . A notice has been issued by Grand Lodge relating to certain irregularities which have taken place with respect

Original Correspondence.

to the Charity jewel , but tbe point I have raised appears to have escaped attention . The matter may not be of very great importance , but as we have a rule to guide us , would it not be better to adhere to it ? Yours fraternally , P . M . 176 S , 421 , & c .

ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCE FUND . To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — I have pleasure in sending you a list of amounts subscribed to the Royal Masonic Pupils' Assistance Fund

to the present time ; also copy of a letter from Bro . Meggy , both of which I shall be glad to see published in the next issue oE your paper . Yours fraternally , DICK RADCLYFFE . 129 , High Holboin , London , W . C , nth March .

ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCL FUND . 1 ith March , 1880 . The following is a list of the amounts subscribed : — DONATIONS . £ s . d . H . R . H . the Prince of Wales ... ... 26 5 o H . R . H . the Duke of Connaught ... 20 o o

H . R . H . Prince Leopold ... ... to a o Rosslyn , Right Hon . tbe Earl of ... ... 26 3 o Clarke , Hyde ... ... ... 10 10 o Egerton , the Hon . Wilbraham , M . P . ... 10 10 o Ferrieres , Baron de ... ... ... 10 10 o Guest , Montague J . ... ... ... 10 10 o

Martyn , Rev . C . J . ... ... ... 10 10 o Tew , T . W ., J . D . ... 5 5 ° Adams , Herbert J . ... ... ... 500 Bagshawe , Rev . Agustus H . ... ... 5 5 ° Barfield , A . ... ... ... 110 Blackburn , George ... ... ... 10 10 o

Bodenham , J . ... ... ... 5 5 o Clarke , Stephenson ... ... ... 10 o o Constable , J ohn ... . . ... 10 10 o Cronin , D . ... ... ... 5 5 o Cronin , F . ... ... ... 5 3 o Cousins . C . ... ... ... 160

Davy , C . R . ... ... ... 1 1 o Gibb , T . Eccleston ... ... ... 10 10 o Godfrey , Henry ... ... . . 5 5 ° Greenfield , John ... ... ... 5 S ° Higham , P . ... ... ... 13 13 o Higham , Mrs . P . ... ... ... 5 1 °

Hopekirk , W . ... ... ... 1 1 o Howkins , Thomas ... ' " ... ... 1 1 o Jacobs , J . ... ... ... 3 S o James , W . H . ... ... ... 1 1 o Johnson , E . ... ... ... 5 5 o Mortis , Rev . R . ... ... ... 1 1 o

Neilson , James Horner ... ... 5 c o Pears , Andrew ... ... ... 5 5 ° Robinson , Rev . George ... ... too Short , Rev . W . F . ... ... ... 5 5 o Spice , R . P . ... . ... ... 500 Storr , E . F . ... ... ... 550

Wentworth , T . J . ... ... ... e 5 o Winkfield , A . P . ... ... ... s 5 o Woodward , E . C . ... ... ... 10 10 o Woodward , Mrs . E . C . ... ... 10 10 o Anness , S . R . ... ... ... 250 Morgan , jun ., W . W , ... ... ... 10 10 o

Radclyffe , Dick ... ... ... 20 o o The Provincial Grand Lodge of Hampshire and the fsle of Wight ... ... 10 10 o Lewis Lodge , No . 1185 , Wood Green ... 5 5 ° Lodge of _ Economy , No . ; 6 , Winchester ... 5 e , o

£ 377 1 ° ° Donations ( as above ) ... ... £ 377 10 o Annual subscriptions ( as other list ) ... 27 9 6 £ 404 19 6 ANNUAL SUBSCRIPTIONS . £ s . d . Hickman , W . ... ... ... 1 1 o

Ayling , T . ... ... ... 1 1 o Bagshawe , Rev . Augustus A . ... ... 1 1 o Challen , Charles ... ... ... 1 1 o Davy , C . R . ... ... ... 110 Eynon , R . ... ... ... o 10 o Frere , E . T . o e o

Godfrey , Henry ... ... ... 1 t o Hodges , H . Howard ... ... ... 110 Hopper , W . ... ... ... o 10 o Johnson , H . J . ... ... ... 1 1 o Miskin , II . ... ... ... o 10 o Petts , E . J . 1 1 o

Pollitzer , S . ... ... ... 1 1 o Ravenshaw , Rev . F . F . ... ... 1 1 o Shaw , Rev . R . D . ... .. ... 1 1 o Smith , H . R . Cooper ... ... ... 1 1 o Snelling , W . Walton ... ... ... 1 1 o Taylor , T . ... ... ... 1 1 o

Thiellay , E . H . ... ... ... 0106 Wentworth , T . G . ... ... ... 220 Adair Lodge , No . 936 , Aldborough ... 1 1 o Lord Warden Lodge , No . 1096 , Deal ... 1 1 o St . Luke ' s Lodge , No . 225 , Ipswich . „ 220 Tranquillity Lodge , No . 185 , London ... 3 3 o

£ 27 9 6 22 , Bedford Place , Russell-square , London , W . C , nth March , 1880 . 1 hereby certify that I have examined the receipt books

Original Correspondence.

of the Royal Masonic Pupils' Assistance Fund and compared them with the bankers' pass book , and that the total receipts to this date amount to £ 110 2 s . ( say one hundred and ten pounds two shillings ) , of which £ 108 6 s . is paid into the bank , as well as a country cheque for £ 1 is ., and that 15 s . has been received in postage stamps .

( Signed ) THOMAS MEGGY , Public Accountant . Rev . C . J . Martyn announced at the meeting that nothing had been drawn out from the bank . D . RADCLYFFE .

7 b the . Editor of thc " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — I am glad to see that the promoters of the new Charity Fund have published a list of sub ; criptions and donations , which is satisfactory ; the difference between the total and the amount paid into the bank would , I presume ,

be accounted for by sums not yet paid . It would have completed the satisfaction of that large section of the public who are always " wanting to know " if a statement of the liabilities that bad been incurred up to the date of the meeting had also been published . Yours fraternally , P . M .

To the Editor of the " Freemason . " Dear Sir and Brother , — It will have been seen by your report , that when I challenged the proposals of this expansive " fund " I was met with cries of " No , no . " In the interests of truth , I beg to inform you that in the hands of those who cried " No , no" was a list of the supposed necessities of the

pupils who leave the Masonic Boys' School , and this list distinctly laid down that the proposed " fund" was to stand as the parent and guardian , not only to the youths , but even to watch over them "through life , " to find them the means of learning professions , of actually " later in life" ( I quote the exact words of the programme ) purchasing businesses for them , and of creating scholarships ,

maintaining them at universities , and of " obtaining" for them commissions in the army and navy . Your faithful report of the proceedings will show that thc proposals were not even " damned with faint praise , " for the common sense of every one plainly expressed that , when not Quixotic , the proposals were idiotic . There is one point to which I should like to call Lord

Rosslyn ' s attention . He expressed his astonishment at the proposals , and virtually withdrew from them . I was aghast at hearing this , for I had received a circular in which I was particularly requested to favour " Lord Rosslyn personally , " by allowing my name to appear as a supporter of the proposed " fund . " Having a keen sense of the great responsibility attached to those who start a new

" Charity , " I had no idea of connecting myself with any cut and dried organisation , in which , as I have seen before , all the Committee are merely so many puppets for some clever manipulator to conjure with ; but it is worth while directing Lord Rosslyn ' s attention to the fact that the large " Committee " appear to have given their names because they were ? iven to understand that Lord Rosslyn

" personally" desired them to assist him in doing some charitable work which he thought necessary to be done . It is now seen that the extent of the work is to assist a few boys who may be friendless . The question is , how far any boys can be absolutely Iriendless when they have conquered the difficulty of an election to a Charity like the Masonic Boys' School . To attain this initial success in

life requires many and influential friends , and if the education given in the School does not fit the boy at sixteen to commence the start in life , well , then I consider it is so much the worse tor the School , and that it is time to consider whether a less expensive and more useful education could not be given—an education which would not be " wasted . " When a school so educates the boys that

on the threshold of life they are helpless unless a new " fund " is created to carry them on to universities , and to " obtain " for them commissions in the army or navy , it is time to consider whether the whole itself is not a mistake . Then , too , what about the Masonic girls ? Is there to be a similar " fund " for the girls , to provide thrm with marriage portions ; to look after them through life ; to sec to

the vaccination of their children , & c . & c , & c . ; to stand in the position of mothers-in-law to litem , simply because they , like the boys , were lucky enough to commence their career in life with many friends who voted them into the School , and then were cruel enough to desert them , leaving them still dependent upon the Masonic brotherhood ? We want no such "fund . " If there are any cases which

require help , it will be forthcoming , but we want no lrrationably enthusiastic brothers advocating that we should go without great coats for a winter , or breakfasts three times a week , or installation banquets , and other means of " saving , " in order to endow with the blessings of a paid Secretariat a new fund with a charity-run-mad programme . Yours faithfully and fraternally , JOHN WHILE , P . M . 228 .

MASONIC CHARITY . The following appears in Saturday ' s Times . To the Editor of the " Times . " Sir , —Reading thc paragraph hereon in Thc Times of today , I beg the favour of a few words . A very old Mason myself and an ardent supporter of our Benevolent Institutions , I earnestly deprecate this new

movement as unnecessary and uncalled for . Lord Rosslyn ' s good-natured remarks a year or two since have heen strained into far more than was intended , and a little personal vanity has done thc rest . Anything in the semblance of a fourth charity will inevitably damage the three that exist and prosper , and I trust that those high in the Craft who have kindly , but ,

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 6
  • You're on page7
  • 8
  • 12
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2026

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy