Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • May 29, 1880
  • Page 3
  • COMMITTEE MEETING OF THE GIRLS' SCHOOL.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, May 29, 1880: Page 3

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, May 29, 1880
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article TYPE AND SYMBOL-MONGERS. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article TYPE AND SYMBOL-MONGERS. Page 2 of 2
    Article COMMITTEE MEETING OF THE GIRLS' SCHOOL. Page 1 of 1
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Type And Symbol-Mongers.

called the ' omblem of all emblems , '" [ why ?] " and the grand emblem of Royal Arch Masonry . It was adopted in the same form as the Royal Arch badge by the Goneral Grand Chapter of tho TJnitod States in 1859 . The original signification has been variously explained , some suppose it to include the initial of the Temple of Jerusalem , Templum Jlierosolymw . Others , that ifc is tho symbol of tho mystical uuion of

the Father and Son , ( -J signifying Jehovah , and f or tho cross , the Son . " Agaiu—« ' Speaking of tho use of tho oross in the Old Testament , Didron says , ' that it saved tho youthful Isaac from death , redeemed from destruction an entire people whoso houses were marked with that symbol , healed tho envenomed bites of thoso who looked at the

serpent raised in the form of a tau upon a polo , and called tho soul of the dead body of the Bon of the poor widow who had given bread to the prophet . '" We see , now , how easily our symbol-monger could Masonize and Christianize Abraham and Isaac , Moses and Aaron , Elijah and Ezekiel , and the Talmndists in the bargain ; for , according to Dr .

Maokey , one and all either worshipped or venerated the cross . But was Masonry designed for teaching such trash ? I have always avoided that species of pedantry of using foreign words in Masonio communications ; bat as I wish to make tho subject clear to the understanding of all , I am therefore , in this instance , compelled to depart from my rale , but mast

premise—First . St . Anthony was not crucified ; the X cannot , therefore , be called " St . Anthony ' s cross " on that account . Seoond . There is no evidenoe whatever that Jews ever worshipped the oross , or venerated the cross , or marked themselves with the oross , or that the Talmudists ever said that Moses did mark a cross . Third . In the Book of Numbers xxi . 8 , 9 , there is no allusion to the

cross , or Tau either , ifc merely says , " Make thee a fiery serpent and put it upon a pole . " " And Moses made a serpent of brass , and put it upon a pole . " * A pole is not a cross . And fourth . In the Hebrew version of Ezekiel ix . 4 , are tho following words : — -in XWI . TI ( Vehitvito tav ) , tho literal translation whereof is , " And you shall mark a mark . " The English Bible has it ,

" And set a mark . " In Leeser ' s Bible it reads , " Inscribe a mark . " There is some difference in the phraseology of the abovo translations , but all concur in the fact , that those words merely convey the idea of making a mark , without the least hint about the shape of the mark . As far as we know , the mark meant by the writer may havo been a mere daub ; for a daub would havo answered the purpose of

distinguishing those that wero to be saved from thoso that wero to be killed , as much as a more complicated mark could do . But Bible oommentators who have dogmas to prove stick at no trifles •and as already shown , tho early Christian fathers were very prolific in discovering far-fetched meanings in tho writings of the Old Testament , henoe the Douay , or Catholic Bible , renders the abovo passage in Ezekiel , "And make a Tau . " But what is a Tau ? This question

the translator of the said Bible answers in a foot-note , thus" Tau is tho last letter in tho Hebrew al phabet , and signifies [ not as a mere letter n , but when written m or tav ] , a sign or mark , which is the reason why some translators render this placeset a mark or mark a mark , without specif ying what this mark was . But St . Jerome and other interpreters conclude it wa 3 the form of the letter Tau , whioh in ancient Hebrew character , was the form of a cross . "

Mosheim says that ono of tho maxims of tho earl y Christian fathers was : — " That it was a virtue to deceive and lie , when by such means the interest of the church might be promoted . " And he adds , " We would willingly except from this ohargo Ambrose and Hilary , Gregory Nazianzen , and Jerome ; but truth , which is more respectable than those venerable fathers , obliges ns to involve fchem in the general accusation . "

As Jerome did not hesitate to deceive and lie for the interests of the Church , we need not wonder at his perverting and misconstruing the words of Ezekiel . Our Masonic symbol-mongers and expounders also believe in the doctrine of deceiving and lying for the benefit of the Churoh ; and hence no matter what shape an emblem may be , and no matter how it is explained in tho Lodge , they persist in declaring

that" It expresses , prefigures , or typifies another fact of a higher and more important nature , " viz ., Christianity . And I verily believe that if tho poker , tongs , and shovel , or any other household utensil , had been Mentioned in the rifcnal , there wonld hare been no end of signifioancies suggested about them . They would havo assured us that

poker , tongs , and shovel , & c , were anciently regarded as symbols of Deity in the religion of Osiris , Moses , or Christ . And as for authorities , they would either have cited the writers of some dreamers , or when even that failed them , they would not have scrupled at inventing authorities .

This emblem J . on the English Master ' s apron , is a fair illustration of the truth of the abovo remark . As already stated , the R . A . and its emblem , wa 3 unknown to Masons before or near tho middle of the last century . Nay , more . D . G . M . Manningham condemned that

new degree as an imposturo , and Grand Secretary Spencer ridiculed the R . A . degreo aboufc 1768 . In 1813 , at the Union , tho Grand Lodge of England was compelled to call tho R . A . degree " Masonic . " And I am strongly inclined to believe that this upside dmon top of the R . A . emblem was not introduced into Craft Masonry by the G . L . of England before 1813 . Dr . Oliver , of course , mado the "Triple Jan" into a Christian emblem . And Dr . Mackey , who was bound

* Leeser ' s Bible reads , " And Moses made a serpent of copper , and put ifc upon a polo " ( omitting " brazen" and " fiery " ) . Tho Douay Bible says , " Made a brazen serpent , and set ifc up for a sign " ( omitting brass and copper ) . And in a note thereto , we are informed

that , " The brazen serpent was a figure of Christ crucified . " To my mind , this kind of figuring seems very ridiculous . But if Christians can be made to believe that the lion , the lamb , the pelican , the fish , the ass , & c , are types of Christ , why may not the serpent also typify Christ ? *

Type And Symbol-Mongers.

to tell us what Dr . Oliver did not , made , as wo have soon , a groat splnrgo abont tho upside down X ( for VP or <'"" - '" ' * '' e Siu"io to him ) and demonstrated after his fashion that _ L is not only a Christian cross , but also that tho identical shaped cross was venerated by Abraham , Isaac , Moses , Aaron , Elijah and Ezekiel ; but as ho had no

authority whatever , not even that of Didron , about Moses marking Aaron with tho cross , ho was not at all abashod , in appealing to Talmndic authority . Such aro the characteristics of our symbol-mongors , whose writings our clerical brethren and pious Masonic editors admiro and applaud . And why p BOSTON , U . S ., 5 th April 1880 .

Committee Meeting Of The Girls' School.

COMMITTEE MEETING OF THE GIRLS' SCHOOL .

THE General Committeo of this Institution mot on Thursday , at Freemasons' Hall , London . Bro . Lieut .-C'ol . Creaton , Grand Treasurer , occupied tho chair , and , as will bo seon from the number of votes recorded for tho several candidates , was supported by a very large nnmbor of Life Governors . The minutes having been read and confirmed , tho general business of tho day was proceeded with . This

comprised , among other matters , tho approval of six petitions , tho children on whoso behalf they wero presented being then placed on the list for tho October election . The plans for affording additional office accommodation , as drawn up by the Grand Superintendent of Works , wero submittod , and the offer of Grand Lodge in this respoct

was accepted , tho ront asked and agreed too being £ 85 a-year . Certain recommendations from the House Committee on matters connected with tho management of the Institntion were brought up and confirmed . The Chairman was authorised to sign cheques for the various accounts which had been passed , and then a notice of motion was given by Bro . C . A . Cottebrune P . G . P . to establish an annual

prize , of the value of threo guineas , to be given to one of tho pupils 1 in memory . of tho late Bro . John Boyd , and to be oalled the John Boyd Memorial Prize . This prize is proposed in consideration of a donation of one hundred guineas made to the funds of the Institution by the members of the Prudent Brethren Lodge and Chapter . The Committee then proceeded to the eloction of tho House and Audit Committees , the following being the result : —

HOUSE COMMITTEE . No . on poll Namo No , of votes 1 Edmund C . Mather ... 284 2 Alfred Henry Tatfcershall - - 272 3 John A . Rucker .... 271 4 Griffiths Smith - . - - 269 5 Frank Richardson .... 268 6 Edward Letchworth . . . - 267

H ( Henry A . Dubois ... 262 \ Joshua Nunn - ... - 262 9 Lieut .-Col . James Peters - - - 261 10 Peter de Lande Long . . - 258 11 William Hope , M . D . . . - - 253 12 Charles Hammerton ... 241

13 Edward Cox 96 14 Thomas Cubitfc ... 94 15 John A . Farnfield ... 86 16 William Stephens .... 83 17 Reuben E . Davis 71

18 Edgar Bowyer ... 68 19 John H . Southwood ... 67 20 Edward Terry .... - 65 21 JohnBellerby 63 22 T . W . C . Bush 62 23 Charles G . Hill ... 60 24 C . H . Webb -- - - - 42

The twelve brethren first named , all of whom , except Bro . Charles Hammerton , were members of the old committee , were declared elected .

AUDIT COMMITTEE . No . on poll Namo No . of votes 1 Henry C . Levander .. .. 309 2 Herbert Dicketts - - - 296 3 John C . Chancellor .... 294 4 Robert B . Webster - - - - 292 5 William Roebuck - - - - 290 6 William Bailey . - - - 288

7 James Cntbush . - - - 283 8 Henry Venn - - - - 273 9 Thomas Kingston .. .. 257 10 Robert Berridgo ... 96 11 Hyam M . Levy- - - - - Gl

The nine brothren highest on the poll were declared elected . These brethren comprised the Audit Committee last year . A voto of thanks to the chairman brought the proceedings to a conclusion .

In the event of the Committee of the Royal Masonic Benevolent Institution deciding to refill the office of Collector , we understand that Bro . William Worrell P . M . and Sec . 766 , & c . and Bro . C . H . Webb P . M . 1607 W . M . 174 , Vice President of the Institution , will offer themselves as candidates . We shall refer to the subject in a future issue .

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1880-05-29, Page 3” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 6 Aug. 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_29051880/page/3/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
UNITED GRAND LODGE. Article 1
TYPE AND SYMBOL-MONGERS. Article 2
COMMITTEE MEETING OF THE GIRLS' SCHOOL. Article 3
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 4
MARK MASONRY. Article 6
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
Untitled Ad 9
Untitled Article 9
QUARTERLY COMMUNICATION OF GRAND LODGE. Article 9
ROYAL ARCH. PROV. G. CHAPTER N. & E. YORKSHIRE. Article 10
PRIORY CHAPTER, No. 1000. Article 10
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 11
THE FIFTEEN SECTIONS Article 11
INSTALLATION MEETINGS, &c. Article 12
LODGE OF ANCIENT CARTHAGE, No. 1717, E.C., AT TUNIS. Article 12
ARNOLD LODGE, No. 1799. Article 12
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

2 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

13 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

3 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

4 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

11 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

4 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

16 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

12 Articles
Page 3

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Type And Symbol-Mongers.

called the ' omblem of all emblems , '" [ why ?] " and the grand emblem of Royal Arch Masonry . It was adopted in the same form as the Royal Arch badge by the Goneral Grand Chapter of tho TJnitod States in 1859 . The original signification has been variously explained , some suppose it to include the initial of the Temple of Jerusalem , Templum Jlierosolymw . Others , that ifc is tho symbol of tho mystical uuion of

the Father and Son , ( -J signifying Jehovah , and f or tho cross , the Son . " Agaiu—« ' Speaking of tho use of tho oross in the Old Testament , Didron says , ' that it saved tho youthful Isaac from death , redeemed from destruction an entire people whoso houses were marked with that symbol , healed tho envenomed bites of thoso who looked at the

serpent raised in the form of a tau upon a polo , and called tho soul of the dead body of the Bon of the poor widow who had given bread to the prophet . '" We see , now , how easily our symbol-monger could Masonize and Christianize Abraham and Isaac , Moses and Aaron , Elijah and Ezekiel , and the Talmndists in the bargain ; for , according to Dr .

Maokey , one and all either worshipped or venerated the cross . But was Masonry designed for teaching such trash ? I have always avoided that species of pedantry of using foreign words in Masonio communications ; bat as I wish to make tho subject clear to the understanding of all , I am therefore , in this instance , compelled to depart from my rale , but mast

premise—First . St . Anthony was not crucified ; the X cannot , therefore , be called " St . Anthony ' s cross " on that account . Seoond . There is no evidenoe whatever that Jews ever worshipped the oross , or venerated the cross , or marked themselves with the oross , or that the Talmudists ever said that Moses did mark a cross . Third . In the Book of Numbers xxi . 8 , 9 , there is no allusion to the

cross , or Tau either , ifc merely says , " Make thee a fiery serpent and put it upon a pole . " " And Moses made a serpent of brass , and put it upon a pole . " * A pole is not a cross . And fourth . In the Hebrew version of Ezekiel ix . 4 , are tho following words : — -in XWI . TI ( Vehitvito tav ) , tho literal translation whereof is , " And you shall mark a mark . " The English Bible has it ,

" And set a mark . " In Leeser ' s Bible it reads , " Inscribe a mark . " There is some difference in the phraseology of the abovo translations , but all concur in the fact , that those words merely convey the idea of making a mark , without the least hint about the shape of the mark . As far as we know , the mark meant by the writer may havo been a mere daub ; for a daub would havo answered the purpose of

distinguishing those that wero to be saved from thoso that wero to be killed , as much as a more complicated mark could do . But Bible oommentators who have dogmas to prove stick at no trifles •and as already shown , tho early Christian fathers were very prolific in discovering far-fetched meanings in tho writings of the Old Testament , henoe the Douay , or Catholic Bible , renders the abovo passage in Ezekiel , "And make a Tau . " But what is a Tau ? This question

the translator of the said Bible answers in a foot-note , thus" Tau is tho last letter in tho Hebrew al phabet , and signifies [ not as a mere letter n , but when written m or tav ] , a sign or mark , which is the reason why some translators render this placeset a mark or mark a mark , without specif ying what this mark was . But St . Jerome and other interpreters conclude it wa 3 the form of the letter Tau , whioh in ancient Hebrew character , was the form of a cross . "

Mosheim says that ono of tho maxims of tho earl y Christian fathers was : — " That it was a virtue to deceive and lie , when by such means the interest of the church might be promoted . " And he adds , " We would willingly except from this ohargo Ambrose and Hilary , Gregory Nazianzen , and Jerome ; but truth , which is more respectable than those venerable fathers , obliges ns to involve fchem in the general accusation . "

As Jerome did not hesitate to deceive and lie for the interests of the Church , we need not wonder at his perverting and misconstruing the words of Ezekiel . Our Masonic symbol-mongers and expounders also believe in the doctrine of deceiving and lying for the benefit of the Churoh ; and hence no matter what shape an emblem may be , and no matter how it is explained in tho Lodge , they persist in declaring

that" It expresses , prefigures , or typifies another fact of a higher and more important nature , " viz ., Christianity . And I verily believe that if tho poker , tongs , and shovel , or any other household utensil , had been Mentioned in the rifcnal , there wonld hare been no end of signifioancies suggested about them . They would havo assured us that

poker , tongs , and shovel , & c , were anciently regarded as symbols of Deity in the religion of Osiris , Moses , or Christ . And as for authorities , they would either have cited the writers of some dreamers , or when even that failed them , they would not have scrupled at inventing authorities .

This emblem J . on the English Master ' s apron , is a fair illustration of the truth of the abovo remark . As already stated , the R . A . and its emblem , wa 3 unknown to Masons before or near tho middle of the last century . Nay , more . D . G . M . Manningham condemned that

new degree as an imposturo , and Grand Secretary Spencer ridiculed the R . A . degreo aboufc 1768 . In 1813 , at the Union , tho Grand Lodge of England was compelled to call tho R . A . degree " Masonic . " And I am strongly inclined to believe that this upside dmon top of the R . A . emblem was not introduced into Craft Masonry by the G . L . of England before 1813 . Dr . Oliver , of course , mado the "Triple Jan" into a Christian emblem . And Dr . Mackey , who was bound

* Leeser ' s Bible reads , " And Moses made a serpent of copper , and put ifc upon a polo " ( omitting " brazen" and " fiery " ) . Tho Douay Bible says , " Made a brazen serpent , and set ifc up for a sign " ( omitting brass and copper ) . And in a note thereto , we are informed

that , " The brazen serpent was a figure of Christ crucified . " To my mind , this kind of figuring seems very ridiculous . But if Christians can be made to believe that the lion , the lamb , the pelican , the fish , the ass , & c , are types of Christ , why may not the serpent also typify Christ ? *

Type And Symbol-Mongers.

to tell us what Dr . Oliver did not , made , as wo have soon , a groat splnrgo abont tho upside down X ( for VP or <'"" - '" ' * '' e Siu"io to him ) and demonstrated after his fashion that _ L is not only a Christian cross , but also that tho identical shaped cross was venerated by Abraham , Isaac , Moses , Aaron , Elijah and Ezekiel ; but as ho had no

authority whatever , not even that of Didron , about Moses marking Aaron with tho cross , ho was not at all abashod , in appealing to Talmndic authority . Such aro the characteristics of our symbol-mongors , whose writings our clerical brethren and pious Masonic editors admiro and applaud . And why p BOSTON , U . S ., 5 th April 1880 .

Committee Meeting Of The Girls' School.

COMMITTEE MEETING OF THE GIRLS' SCHOOL .

THE General Committeo of this Institution mot on Thursday , at Freemasons' Hall , London . Bro . Lieut .-C'ol . Creaton , Grand Treasurer , occupied tho chair , and , as will bo seon from the number of votes recorded for tho several candidates , was supported by a very large nnmbor of Life Governors . The minutes having been read and confirmed , tho general business of tho day was proceeded with . This

comprised , among other matters , tho approval of six petitions , tho children on whoso behalf they wero presented being then placed on the list for tho October election . The plans for affording additional office accommodation , as drawn up by the Grand Superintendent of Works , wero submittod , and the offer of Grand Lodge in this respoct

was accepted , tho ront asked and agreed too being £ 85 a-year . Certain recommendations from the House Committee on matters connected with tho management of the Institntion were brought up and confirmed . The Chairman was authorised to sign cheques for the various accounts which had been passed , and then a notice of motion was given by Bro . C . A . Cottebrune P . G . P . to establish an annual

prize , of the value of threo guineas , to be given to one of tho pupils 1 in memory . of tho late Bro . John Boyd , and to be oalled the John Boyd Memorial Prize . This prize is proposed in consideration of a donation of one hundred guineas made to the funds of the Institution by the members of the Prudent Brethren Lodge and Chapter . The Committee then proceeded to the eloction of tho House and Audit Committees , the following being the result : —

HOUSE COMMITTEE . No . on poll Namo No , of votes 1 Edmund C . Mather ... 284 2 Alfred Henry Tatfcershall - - 272 3 John A . Rucker .... 271 4 Griffiths Smith - . - - 269 5 Frank Richardson .... 268 6 Edward Letchworth . . . - 267

H ( Henry A . Dubois ... 262 \ Joshua Nunn - ... - 262 9 Lieut .-Col . James Peters - - - 261 10 Peter de Lande Long . . - 258 11 William Hope , M . D . . . - - 253 12 Charles Hammerton ... 241

13 Edward Cox 96 14 Thomas Cubitfc ... 94 15 John A . Farnfield ... 86 16 William Stephens .... 83 17 Reuben E . Davis 71

18 Edgar Bowyer ... 68 19 John H . Southwood ... 67 20 Edward Terry .... - 65 21 JohnBellerby 63 22 T . W . C . Bush 62 23 Charles G . Hill ... 60 24 C . H . Webb -- - - - 42

The twelve brethren first named , all of whom , except Bro . Charles Hammerton , were members of the old committee , were declared elected .

AUDIT COMMITTEE . No . on poll Namo No . of votes 1 Henry C . Levander .. .. 309 2 Herbert Dicketts - - - 296 3 John C . Chancellor .... 294 4 Robert B . Webster - - - - 292 5 William Roebuck - - - - 290 6 William Bailey . - - - 288

7 James Cntbush . - - - 283 8 Henry Venn - - - - 273 9 Thomas Kingston .. .. 257 10 Robert Berridgo ... 96 11 Hyam M . Levy- - - - - Gl

The nine brothren highest on the poll were declared elected . These brethren comprised the Audit Committee last year . A voto of thanks to the chairman brought the proceedings to a conclusion .

In the event of the Committee of the Royal Masonic Benevolent Institution deciding to refill the office of Collector , we understand that Bro . William Worrell P . M . and Sec . 766 , & c . and Bro . C . H . Webb P . M . 1607 W . M . 174 , Vice President of the Institution , will offer themselves as candidates . We shall refer to the subject in a future issue .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 2
  • You're on page3
  • 4
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy