Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Feb. 21, 1880
  • Page 4
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Feb. 21, 1880: Page 4

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Feb. 21, 1880
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article CORRESPONDENCE. ← Page 2 of 2
    Article CORRESPONDENCE. Page 2 of 2
    Article DISAPPOINTED. Page 1 of 1
    Article MEETING OF THE LODGE OF BENEVOLENCE. Page 1 of 1
Page 4

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Correspondence.

distinguished from tho whole . I submit that in no respect aro these threo points , which lie at tho root of tho religions aspects of Freemasonry , sectarian dogmas . They aro held by tho entire body of Christians throughout tho world not in obedience to any human authority , secular or religions , but , if I may use the expression , as axioms based on the instincts and experience of mankind at large , and

only incapable of demonstration by reason of their being matters of faith . Further , two of these points certainly , and I think few will contradict mo if I add tho third also , viz , tho resurrection of the body , are held equally by Christians , Jews , Mahometans , Parsees , Buddhists , in fact by all men who havo any idea of religion . Masonry

therefore is to all intents and purposes universal ; jnst as it is true to say that mon universally havo two feet , albeit some poor creatures aro born without tho fnll complement of members—so it is not necessary to go out of our course to consider the accidental monstrosities , to be found , alas ! in every age , who deliberately shut their eyes , and thon proclaim themselves as being tho only people who aro

not in tho dark . Bro . Norton makes an amusing mis-quotation . He speaks of tho W . M ' . s promising candidates that " Masonio duties will not interfere with thoir religious opinions . " Snroly tho W . M merely says to tho candidate ivho has already confessed his faith in God , that his Masonic OB . will not clash with his religious duties . Imagine tho religious

opinions of a man who denies the existence of a God or a future state ! Further , Sir , Bro . Norton sneers ab clerical brethren . Let me assure him , as a clergyman and a Mason of 25 years standing , that opposition to a scheme for the " secularising " of Freemasonry will not como from the clergy only ; we in England aro proud to know that the overwhelming majority of our lay brethren are at one with

us m a sincere and loyal faith in the primary elements of religious truth . If we , which God forbid , were content to be silent , they would immediately cry out and shame onr silence . Lastly , Sir , Bro . Norton is sick and tired of hearing that Masonry is a religion , and that it is not a religion . The italics are his . Can ho really not understand how a man may with perfect consistency say ,

" I am a religious man , holding and practising according to my ability religious truth ; but it is not my office to teach it , and I decline to do so ? Similarly a body of men may fairly claim a religious character for the society to which they belong , and yet withhold from pronouncing , or as our brother would say " dogmatizing" in matters

ot faith . I am , Dear Sir and Brother , Yours fraternally , 11 th February 1880 . P . G . C . OXON , 489 .

ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCE FUND . To the Editor of the FREEMASON ' S CHRONICLE . DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I quite agree with you that in any scheme for assisting tho children of deceased or indigent brethren , Warwickshire would play its part right loyally , but it strikes mo the fear as to expense as expressed by Bro . Machen in his letter of the 3 rd inst . is groundless . Tho Assistance Fund once raised will

be invested in the names of certain trustees . There will bo nn honorary Treasurer who , will receive and disburse moneys on account of the Fund . A Committee of Management , to receive and consider applications for assistance would be necessary , but this would cost nothing , as those who already take an active interest in our Schools would , I am sure , be only too glad to give the slight

services—slight as regards the time they would occupy , though important in other respects—that would be required of them , gratuitously . There would remain only the expense of postage , circulars , and an annual report , which need not and , I imagine , would not be excessive . The Fund would not require to be a large one , for I presume it is not contemplated to incur tho expense of sending a number

of pupils to ono or other of the Universities , or to give a preliminary course of education to all who are candidates for admission into our Schools until they succeed in being elected . Only now and then will be found a pupil who is likely to achieve distinction at a University , and in assisting others on leaving School to begin the battle of life , a

moderate sum , judiciously applied , will go a long way . Nor is the education of small children in the neighbourhoods in which they live likely to bo very heavy . Thus , there is no reason why , in administering a supplementary Fund , a numerous staff of paid officials should bo organised . Fraternally yours , BETA ,

THE GENERAL COMMITTEE AND BRO . S . BARTON WILSON .

To the " Editor of the FREEMASON ' S CHRONICLE . DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I read with much regret in your account of the meeting of the Committee , that Bro . Stephen B . Wilson _ claim , which has been so long nnder consideration by tho authorities of the Boys' School , has been referred back to the Ilonso Committee . Now this strikes me as being most unbusinesslike . Tho House

Committee have already considered the claim , and there is little likelihood of their being able to throw further light upon it . There is but one issue which has to be determined , and many months are not needed for tho purpose . Either tho claim is just or unjust , and Bro . Wilson a long timo ago handsomely offered to submit it to

the arbitration of a prominent member of his own profession about whoso worthiness to act in that capacity there cannot bo the slightest question . This shows that Bro . Wilson has perfect faith in the justice of his charges , and as it is hardly possible to find a better way of settling tho matter , I am at a loss to see why tho Committee

Correspondence.

have rejected Bro . Wilson ' s offer . Without further and moro satisfactory explanation than any tho authorities havo yefc given , I should say—speaking of course Masonically , as certain other people speak in a Pickwickian sense—that harsh treatment is being , and for some time past has been , meted out to Bro . Wilson in being thus bandied about from pillar to post , or to be as precise aa possible ,

from Houso Committeo to General Committee , and back again to the former , and the question very naturally arises , are these Com . mittecs competent to settle whether an architect ' s charges are juab or unjust ? I imagine not , any more than a lay tribunal ia competent to decide on technical points of law . Why not then have reconrso to arbitration , when tho matter in dispute can be settled

in a few minutes , always providing , at least , the arbitrators possess a sound knowledge of the business to bo determined . It may cost a little more than a brief " consideration " repeated monthly across a table , but it will be moro dignified and less expensive than it must bo if the difference has to be settled legally . In Committees there may be safety , in the sense of security from all responsibility for

individual opinions , but I question if there is always a display of wisdom . Let ns hopo tho Houso Committee , by tbe time these lines meet tho eyes of your readers , will havo completed their portion of the arduous task of considering . It is a fine thing to have a proper idea of duty , a still finer thing to fulfil that duty conscientiously , but it is tho finest thing of all when people are able to

bring common sense to bear in the conscientions fulfilment of a duty they appreciate and understand ; and references and considerations , needlessly repeated , are not in accordance with common sense , but rather with a dilatory and perfunctory style of work ; or , shall I say ? with what has come to be known in Parliamentary circles , as tho policy of " obstruction . " I am , Faithfully and fraternally yours , T . G . It .

[ Wo think there is some force in our correspondent's , remarks as to tho unbusiness-liko character of these repeated delays , and shall take an early opportunity of considering tho subject . We think , too , with him , that whilo Bro . Stephen Barton Wilson is having more than his just share of consideration of ono kind , he is receiving less than he is entitled to expect of consideration of another kind . — ED . F . C ]

The following verses , describing an incident thab occurred afc the opening of Parliament by tho Queen on Thursday , Sth February last , aro culled from a contemporary : —

Disappointed.

DISAPPOINTED .

On Thursday morning last our office-boy Remarked , "In state the Queen will open session . " Said we , " Well , go , if it will give you joy , And try to make a great and good impression , — By uttering a loud though childish cheer , And smiling sweetly right from ear to ear . "

Forthwith he went , and quickly found a place Before the mighty crowd awaiting Royalty ; He pnt a cheerful smile upon his face , Which savoured more of impishness than loyalty ! Yet , ah ! his wish to cheer was most insatient , And waiting idly made him quite impatient .

At last the Queen arrived . A breath ho drew As near to him the prancing horses pattered ; He raised his hat , and raised his small voice too , But all his cherished hopes were rudely shattered , A very stout policeman , indiscreetly , Eclipsed onr little office-boy completely !

A moment more , and then be moved aside ; But , ah ! the Queen had journeyed on ahead ! Our little office-boy gave way and cried , For all his fondly-cherished hopes were dead . No matter how he smiled , how loud his cheer , Her Majesty could neither see nor hear ! ) th February 1880 . F . JULIAN CROOEK .

Meeting Of The Lodge Of Benevolence.

MEETING OF THE LODGE OF BENEVOLENCE .

rnHE Lodge of Benevolence and the Quarterly Board of Masters -L was held on Wednesday evening , at Freemasons' Hall . Bro . Joshua Nunn took the chair of President , Bro . James Brett tho chair of Senior Vice-President , and Bro . James Kench the chair of Jnnior Vice-President . Nearly a hundred brethren attended . The agenda paper , on which wore several important and interesting matters for

discussion at next Quarterly Communication of Grand Lodge , on the 3 rd of March , was read to tho brethren by the Grand Secretary , Col . Shadwell H . Gierke ; after which tho Lodgo of Benevolence was opened , and tho brethren confirmed tho granting of £ 270 , recommended at tho last meeting . The now list of petitions contained the

names of thirty-one applicants for relief , and the consideration of these occupied a protracted sitting of close upon five hours . In the result two cases wero deferred , and tho remaining twenty-nine were i-- _ i--. * - > v _ -- ~ " —~ __ . _ .. __ , ___ W _ ---. __ . _ _ U -vYuubjr - _ ¦ __ YY-A- .

relieved with recommendations of grants , and grants amounting in all to £ 913 , viz ., three of £ 75 each , threo of £ 50 each , five of £ 40 each , threo of £ 30 each , threo of £ 25 each , seven of £ 20 each , two of £ 10 each , two of £ 5 and one of £ 3 .

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1880-02-21, Page 4” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 15 Aug. 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_21021880/page/4/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE ANALYSIS OF THE SUBSCRIPTION LIST. Article 1
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 3
DISAPPOINTED. Article 4
MEETING OF THE LODGE OF BENEVOLENCE. Article 4
INSTALLATION MEETINGS, &c. Article 5
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
THE ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCE FUND. Article 8
GRAND LODGE OF SCOTLAND. Article 9
Obituary. Article 9
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 10
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 11
NEW CONCORD LODGE BALL. Article 12
THE GREAT CITY LODGE, No. 1426. Article 12
THE PRINCE OF WALES AT TRURO. Article 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
Untitled Ad 13
THE ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCE FUND, Article 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

2 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

3 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

4 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

2 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

14 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

4 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

3 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

7 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

4 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

20 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

12 Articles
Page 4

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Correspondence.

distinguished from tho whole . I submit that in no respect aro these threo points , which lie at tho root of tho religions aspects of Freemasonry , sectarian dogmas . They aro held by tho entire body of Christians throughout tho world not in obedience to any human authority , secular or religions , but , if I may use the expression , as axioms based on the instincts and experience of mankind at large , and

only incapable of demonstration by reason of their being matters of faith . Further , two of these points certainly , and I think few will contradict mo if I add tho third also , viz , tho resurrection of the body , are held equally by Christians , Jews , Mahometans , Parsees , Buddhists , in fact by all men who havo any idea of religion . Masonry

therefore is to all intents and purposes universal ; jnst as it is true to say that mon universally havo two feet , albeit some poor creatures aro born without tho fnll complement of members—so it is not necessary to go out of our course to consider the accidental monstrosities , to be found , alas ! in every age , who deliberately shut their eyes , and thon proclaim themselves as being tho only people who aro

not in tho dark . Bro . Norton makes an amusing mis-quotation . He speaks of tho W . M ' . s promising candidates that " Masonio duties will not interfere with thoir religious opinions . " Snroly tho W . M merely says to tho candidate ivho has already confessed his faith in God , that his Masonic OB . will not clash with his religious duties . Imagine tho religious

opinions of a man who denies the existence of a God or a future state ! Further , Sir , Bro . Norton sneers ab clerical brethren . Let me assure him , as a clergyman and a Mason of 25 years standing , that opposition to a scheme for the " secularising " of Freemasonry will not como from the clergy only ; we in England aro proud to know that the overwhelming majority of our lay brethren are at one with

us m a sincere and loyal faith in the primary elements of religious truth . If we , which God forbid , were content to be silent , they would immediately cry out and shame onr silence . Lastly , Sir , Bro . Norton is sick and tired of hearing that Masonry is a religion , and that it is not a religion . The italics are his . Can ho really not understand how a man may with perfect consistency say ,

" I am a religious man , holding and practising according to my ability religious truth ; but it is not my office to teach it , and I decline to do so ? Similarly a body of men may fairly claim a religious character for the society to which they belong , and yet withhold from pronouncing , or as our brother would say " dogmatizing" in matters

ot faith . I am , Dear Sir and Brother , Yours fraternally , 11 th February 1880 . P . G . C . OXON , 489 .

ROYAL MASONIC PUPILS' ASSISTANCE FUND . To the Editor of the FREEMASON ' S CHRONICLE . DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I quite agree with you that in any scheme for assisting tho children of deceased or indigent brethren , Warwickshire would play its part right loyally , but it strikes mo the fear as to expense as expressed by Bro . Machen in his letter of the 3 rd inst . is groundless . Tho Assistance Fund once raised will

be invested in the names of certain trustees . There will bo nn honorary Treasurer who , will receive and disburse moneys on account of the Fund . A Committee of Management , to receive and consider applications for assistance would be necessary , but this would cost nothing , as those who already take an active interest in our Schools would , I am sure , be only too glad to give the slight

services—slight as regards the time they would occupy , though important in other respects—that would be required of them , gratuitously . There would remain only the expense of postage , circulars , and an annual report , which need not and , I imagine , would not be excessive . The Fund would not require to be a large one , for I presume it is not contemplated to incur tho expense of sending a number

of pupils to ono or other of the Universities , or to give a preliminary course of education to all who are candidates for admission into our Schools until they succeed in being elected . Only now and then will be found a pupil who is likely to achieve distinction at a University , and in assisting others on leaving School to begin the battle of life , a

moderate sum , judiciously applied , will go a long way . Nor is the education of small children in the neighbourhoods in which they live likely to bo very heavy . Thus , there is no reason why , in administering a supplementary Fund , a numerous staff of paid officials should bo organised . Fraternally yours , BETA ,

THE GENERAL COMMITTEE AND BRO . S . BARTON WILSON .

To the " Editor of the FREEMASON ' S CHRONICLE . DEAR SIR AND BROTHER , —I read with much regret in your account of the meeting of the Committee , that Bro . Stephen B . Wilson _ claim , which has been so long nnder consideration by tho authorities of the Boys' School , has been referred back to the Ilonso Committee . Now this strikes me as being most unbusinesslike . Tho House

Committee have already considered the claim , and there is little likelihood of their being able to throw further light upon it . There is but one issue which has to be determined , and many months are not needed for tho purpose . Either tho claim is just or unjust , and Bro . Wilson a long timo ago handsomely offered to submit it to

the arbitration of a prominent member of his own profession about whoso worthiness to act in that capacity there cannot bo the slightest question . This shows that Bro . Wilson has perfect faith in the justice of his charges , and as it is hardly possible to find a better way of settling tho matter , I am at a loss to see why tho Committee

Correspondence.

have rejected Bro . Wilson ' s offer . Without further and moro satisfactory explanation than any tho authorities havo yefc given , I should say—speaking of course Masonically , as certain other people speak in a Pickwickian sense—that harsh treatment is being , and for some time past has been , meted out to Bro . Wilson in being thus bandied about from pillar to post , or to be as precise aa possible ,

from Houso Committeo to General Committee , and back again to the former , and the question very naturally arises , are these Com . mittecs competent to settle whether an architect ' s charges are juab or unjust ? I imagine not , any more than a lay tribunal ia competent to decide on technical points of law . Why not then have reconrso to arbitration , when tho matter in dispute can be settled

in a few minutes , always providing , at least , the arbitrators possess a sound knowledge of the business to bo determined . It may cost a little more than a brief " consideration " repeated monthly across a table , but it will be moro dignified and less expensive than it must bo if the difference has to be settled legally . In Committees there may be safety , in the sense of security from all responsibility for

individual opinions , but I question if there is always a display of wisdom . Let ns hopo tho Houso Committee , by tbe time these lines meet tho eyes of your readers , will havo completed their portion of the arduous task of considering . It is a fine thing to have a proper idea of duty , a still finer thing to fulfil that duty conscientiously , but it is tho finest thing of all when people are able to

bring common sense to bear in the conscientions fulfilment of a duty they appreciate and understand ; and references and considerations , needlessly repeated , are not in accordance with common sense , but rather with a dilatory and perfunctory style of work ; or , shall I say ? with what has come to be known in Parliamentary circles , as tho policy of " obstruction . " I am , Faithfully and fraternally yours , T . G . It .

[ Wo think there is some force in our correspondent's , remarks as to tho unbusiness-liko character of these repeated delays , and shall take an early opportunity of considering tho subject . We think , too , with him , that whilo Bro . Stephen Barton Wilson is having more than his just share of consideration of ono kind , he is receiving less than he is entitled to expect of consideration of another kind . — ED . F . C ]

The following verses , describing an incident thab occurred afc the opening of Parliament by tho Queen on Thursday , Sth February last , aro culled from a contemporary : —

Disappointed.

DISAPPOINTED .

On Thursday morning last our office-boy Remarked , "In state the Queen will open session . " Said we , " Well , go , if it will give you joy , And try to make a great and good impression , — By uttering a loud though childish cheer , And smiling sweetly right from ear to ear . "

Forthwith he went , and quickly found a place Before the mighty crowd awaiting Royalty ; He pnt a cheerful smile upon his face , Which savoured more of impishness than loyalty ! Yet , ah ! his wish to cheer was most insatient , And waiting idly made him quite impatient .

At last the Queen arrived . A breath ho drew As near to him the prancing horses pattered ; He raised his hat , and raised his small voice too , But all his cherished hopes were rudely shattered , A very stout policeman , indiscreetly , Eclipsed onr little office-boy completely !

A moment more , and then be moved aside ; But , ah ! the Queen had journeyed on ahead ! Our little office-boy gave way and cried , For all his fondly-cherished hopes were dead . No matter how he smiled , how loud his cheer , Her Majesty could neither see nor hear ! ) th February 1880 . F . JULIAN CROOEK .

Meeting Of The Lodge Of Benevolence.

MEETING OF THE LODGE OF BENEVOLENCE .

rnHE Lodge of Benevolence and the Quarterly Board of Masters -L was held on Wednesday evening , at Freemasons' Hall . Bro . Joshua Nunn took the chair of President , Bro . James Brett tho chair of Senior Vice-President , and Bro . James Kench the chair of Jnnior Vice-President . Nearly a hundred brethren attended . The agenda paper , on which wore several important and interesting matters for

discussion at next Quarterly Communication of Grand Lodge , on the 3 rd of March , was read to tho brethren by the Grand Secretary , Col . Shadwell H . Gierke ; after which tho Lodgo of Benevolence was opened , and tho brethren confirmed tho granting of £ 270 , recommended at tho last meeting . The now list of petitions contained the

names of thirty-one applicants for relief , and the consideration of these occupied a protracted sitting of close upon five hours . In the result two cases wero deferred , and tho remaining twenty-nine were i-- _ i--. * - > v _ -- ~ " —~ __ . _ .. __ , ___ W _ ---. __ . _ _ U -vYuubjr - _ ¦ __ YY-A- .

relieved with recommendations of grants , and grants amounting in all to £ 913 , viz ., three of £ 75 each , threo of £ 50 each , five of £ 40 each , threo of £ 30 each , threo of £ 25 each , seven of £ 20 each , two of £ 10 each , two of £ 5 and one of £ 3 .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 3
  • You're on page4
  • 5
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy