Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Nov. 20, 1875
  • Page 6
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Nov. 20, 1875: Page 6

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Nov. 20, 1875
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article REVIEWS. ← Page 2 of 3
    Article REVIEWS. Page 2 of 3 →
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Reviews.

particular virtues to particular numbers , and among them ono of the most illustrious of their number , Pythagoras , must be cited as an illustration . By him the Monad was taken to represent the T . G . A . O . T . U ., and it was symbolised by the hierogram " of a point

within a circle or equilateral triangle , to exemplify the unity of Divine essence , and His Eternity , there being neither beginning of years nor end of days . " But we cannot do better than quote tho rest of the passage ; " And this deduction , " continues Dr . Oliver , " aj ^ pcars perfectly reasonable : —

" Because the Monad or Point is the original and cause of the entire numeral system , as God is the cause of all things , being the only and great Creator on whom everything depends ; for if there were more all-powerful Beings than one , none would be independent , nor would all perfections be centred in one individual , ' neither formally by

reason of their distinction , nor eminently and virtually , for then one should have power to produce the other , and that nature which is producible is not divine . But all acknowledge God to be absolutely and infinitely perfect , in whom all perfections imaginable , which are simply such , must be contained formally , and all others which imply any mixture of perfection , virtually . '"

Having offered farther remarks on this number , especially in connection with its interest from a Masonic point of view , Dr . Oliver proceeds to tell us that : — " Amongst the Grecian philosophers , was a symbol of the hermaphrodite deity , or junction of the sexes , because it partakes of two natures . In a mysterious passage of the Yajur Veda , Brahma is spoken of ,

after his emanation from the golden egg , as experiencing fear at being alone in the universe ; he therefore willed the existence of another , and instantly became masculo-f eminine . The two sexes thus existing in one god were immediately , by another act of volition , divided in twain , and became man and wife . This tradition seems to have found its way into Greece ; for the Androgyne of Plato is but another version of this Oriental myth . If the Monad be added to an odd

iiumber , it makes it even , and if to an even number , it makes it odd . Hence it was called Jupiter , because it stands at the head of numbers , as Jupiter is at tho head of gods and men ; and also Vesta or Fire , because , like the point within a circle , it is seated in the midst of the world . It was also called the Throne of Jupiter , from the great power which the centre has in the universe , being able to restrain its general circular motion , as if the custody of the Maker of all things were constituted therein . "

The author further points out the meaning of the number , and what , at various times , and by various wise men , it was taken to symbolize . Thus , according to Hierocles the Pythagorean , the gods were likened to the Monad , " because there is one immutability and firmness of the virtues , which , it is reasonable to suppose , subsists transcendontly with the gods , and which imparts a never-failing

stability to their conceptions . " Among the same sect it was regarded as the symbol of love and friendship , of the oneness of mankind as a brotherhood , knit together by the same ties of love and Charity . Again , according to the same Hierocles already quoted , Ono symbolized the Platonic or Pythagorean doctrine of benevolence . This sage says : —

" Each of us is , as it wore , circumscribed by many concentric circles ; some of which are less , but others larger , and some comprehend , but others are comprehended , according to the different and unequal habitudes with respect to each other . For the first and most proximate circle is that which every one describes about his own mind as a centre , in which circle the body , and whatever is assumed

for the sake of the body , are comprehended . For this is nearly the smallest circle , and almost touches tho centre itself . The second from this , and which is at a greater distance from the centre , but comprehends the first circle , is that in which parents , brothers , wife , and children are arranged . The third circle from the centre is that which contains uncles and aunts , grandfathers and grandmothers , and the children of brothers and sisters . After this is tho circle

which comprehends the remaining relatives . Next to this is that which contains the common people , then that which comprehends those of the same tribe , afterwards that which contains the citizens ; and then two other circles follow , one being the circle of those that dwell in the vicinity of the city , and the other of those of the same province . But the outermost and greatest circle , and which comprehends all the other circles , is that of the whole human race . "

As to the importance of the number , we have several authorities given , but we content ourselves with the following extract : — " According to Euclid , in his second definition of the seventh book , numbers aro formed of many units ; but unity being indivisible , has no composition , nor is it a number , but the fountain and mother of alt numbers . Being tho cause of all numbers , they are formed by a

plurality of units . Thus 2 is twice 1 ; 3 is three units , & c . ; so that all numbers require the Monad , while it exists by itself without requiring any other . All which is to be considered of the First Cause ; for as one is no number , but the cause and beginning of number , ' so tho First Cause has no affini to creatures , but is tho cause and beginning of them ; they all stand in need of Him , and He requires

assistance from none . He is all in all , and all are included in Him in the most simple unity . The Jewish Rabbins agree that Ho is One , and there is no unity like His in the universe ; the nearest idea that we can form of Him is symbolised by the unit or the figure ono . " The Pythagoreans say , 'The Monad is the principle of all thin"S .

From the Monad came the indeterminate duad , as matters subjected to the cause , Monad ; from the Monad and indeterminate duad , Numbers ; from numbers , Points ; points , Lines ; from lines , Superfices ; from superfices , Solids ; from these solid Bodies , whose elements are four , Fire , Water , Air , Earth ; of all which , transmutated , and totally changed , the World consists . '"

These extracts will servo to show how elaborately , how minutely , Dr . Oliver has studied the meaning and symbolism of this number , or rather this " cause ol' all numbers , " but we need not follow him

Reviews.

through the few remaining pages of the chapter , which are only farther and confirmatory illustrations of the value of the Monad . Similarly with the other numbers , the exposition throughout is equally interesting—amusing , we may also say , in some places , and , in nearly all cases , equally lucid . We except the following on " tho Hexad : "—

" The sceptics used to amuse themselves by such arguments as these : If something be detracted from another , either an equal is detracted from an equal , a greater from a lesser , or a lesser from a greater . But none of these—therefore detraction is not possible . That detraction is not made by any of these ways is manifest . That which is detracted from another must be contained in it ; but an

equal is not contained in an equal , as six in six ; for that which con * taineth ought to be greater than that which is contained . Neither is the greater contained in the lesser , as six in five ; that were absurd . Neither is the lesser contained in the greater ; for if five were con . tained in six , by the same reason , in five will be contained four ; in four , three ; in three , two ; and in two , one . Thus six shall contain

five , fonr , three , two , and one , which being pnt together make fifteen , which must be contained in six , if it be granted that the lesser is contained in the greater . In like manner , in the fifteen which is thus contained in six , will be contained thirty-five ; and so by progression , infinite numbers ; but it is absurd to say that infinite numbers are contained in the number six ; therefore it is absurd to say that the lesser is contained in the greater . "

Now here we confess to being somewhat in a fog . We presume the whole of the arguments were employed by the sceptics , but there is nothing to indicate whether this is so or not , or whether the part of the passage beginning— " That detraction is not made , " to the end , is not Dr . Oliver's comment . Be this as it may , iu either case we join issue as to detraction not being made in either of these ways .

We hold that , mathematically , an equal is contained in an equal , and that it is contained exactly : and further , that five is contained in six , with a unit as remainder . We do not admit the theory that if six contains five , and five four , four three , & c , & c , therefore six contains fifteen—and , ultimately , that infinite numbers might bo contained in six . This is obviously a fallacy , but whether of the

Sceptics' or Dr . Oliver ' s own creation , we have no means of determining . It is impossible , of course , within the circumscribed limits at our command to give more than a very limited idea of the volume Suffice that each number is similarly treated as number one , that in nearly every case the treatment is as interesting , and this remark

especially applies to the Triad , the Tetrad and the Ennead , some singular properties of the first and last of which are well known , no doubt , to our readers . The few remarks we intend to add refer rather to the lnannnr of publication than to its contents . We think the publishers have exercised a wise discretion in leaving Dr . Oliver ' s text undisturbed : but we see no reason why the services of some

competent scholar should not have been called in in order to explain the abstruser portions of the work . We may fairly reckon that the majority of those who read this work will be Masons , but not all Masons arc sufficiently acquainted with Hebrew , Greek and Latin to understand the many passages and words in those languages with which the volume is interspersed . Had translations of these been added in

the shape of footnotes , the value of the work would have been greatly increased , and we trust , if a new edition be called for , this oversight will be remedied . Here is another reason why some classical scholar should have been invited to peruse the manuscript before it appeared in print . We are not sure the passages are correctly given . The quotation , at p . 52 , "Nequc enim tanta , & c , " is punctuated wrongly . It is impossible there should be a full stop after polytlicotes . As the

passage stands it has no meaning whatever , but remove the objectionable point , and we see its meaning at once , namely , " It was not the number of the Gods , worshipped by different peoples that was so considerable as the titles under which they were worshipped . This is only one , but it is a conspicuous case of an error having crept in for want of due oversight . But these aro points that can be remedied , and wo trust they will be removed in any future issue .

The Art of Swimming . By CAPTAIN WEBB , the Channel Swimmer . ( Edited by A . G . Payne . ) London : Ward , Lock & Tyler , Warwick House , Paternoster-row . NEXT week Captain Webb will be welcomed cordially into the ranks of Masonry , and his Essay on " The Art of Swimming , " apart from its intrinsic value , comes very opportunely , for it will enable our

readers to judge what manner of man it is who will so shortly become one of us . The story of his life is simply told . Wo said , last week , that brave men were men of kindness , and Captain Webb ' s account of his career , certainly confirms our dictum . He has worked bard and honourably in the career he chose when yet a boy of twelve . He has proved himself to be one of that class of

undaunted sailors , on whoso skill and courage England will have to rely chiefly in any danger that may threaten her . He possesses more than one testimonial to his unselfish daring , while the feat with which his name will ever bo associated , is , as we have previously remarked , unexampled in the history of all ages and peoples . There is , absolutely , no instance on record of a man having swum for nearly

twenty-two hours without a moment ' s respite ; and great things may bo expected of one who has done what no mortal man ever did before . The one feature that most strikes every one who reads the simple narration of Captain Webb ' s life , is his strict observance of tho truth . On no occasion did he ever allow himself to swerve even a hair ' s breadth into the crooked path of equivocation , much less into

that of wilful misrepresentation , and the man who can honestly show this is worthy the appreciation of the world . The Essay on Swimming is capitally written . The style is unaffected . The advice it contains is sound and practical . His illustrations of the respective merits of the breast-stroke , the side-stroke , and the overliaud-sfcrokc ; his instructions how to hold

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1875-11-20, Page 6” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 24 June 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_20111875/page/6/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE MANAGEMENT OF THE BOY'S SCHOOL. Article 1
MASONIC PORTRAITS. (No. 3.) THE MAN OF ENERGY. Article 1
RUMOURS OF WAR. Article 2
THE ANTIQUITY AND OBJECTS OF MASONRY. Article 2
HOW TO OBTAIN THE MASONIC SPIRIT. Article 3
PROVINCE OF BERKS AND BUCKS. CONSECRATION OF A NEW LODGE AT MAIDENHEAD. Article 3
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 4
ANSWERS TO CORRESPONDENTS. Article 5
REVIEWS. Article 5
Untitled Ad 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
OUR WEEKLY BUDGET. Article 8
CONSECRATION OF A NEW LODGE. Article 10
TRAFALGAR R.A. CHAPTER, 157 S.C., ST. HELENS, NEW ZEALAND, Article 10
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 11
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 11
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

4 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

5 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

3 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

9 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

13 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

14 Articles
Page 6

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Reviews.

particular virtues to particular numbers , and among them ono of the most illustrious of their number , Pythagoras , must be cited as an illustration . By him the Monad was taken to represent the T . G . A . O . T . U ., and it was symbolised by the hierogram " of a point

within a circle or equilateral triangle , to exemplify the unity of Divine essence , and His Eternity , there being neither beginning of years nor end of days . " But we cannot do better than quote tho rest of the passage ; " And this deduction , " continues Dr . Oliver , " aj ^ pcars perfectly reasonable : —

" Because the Monad or Point is the original and cause of the entire numeral system , as God is the cause of all things , being the only and great Creator on whom everything depends ; for if there were more all-powerful Beings than one , none would be independent , nor would all perfections be centred in one individual , ' neither formally by

reason of their distinction , nor eminently and virtually , for then one should have power to produce the other , and that nature which is producible is not divine . But all acknowledge God to be absolutely and infinitely perfect , in whom all perfections imaginable , which are simply such , must be contained formally , and all others which imply any mixture of perfection , virtually . '"

Having offered farther remarks on this number , especially in connection with its interest from a Masonic point of view , Dr . Oliver proceeds to tell us that : — " Amongst the Grecian philosophers , was a symbol of the hermaphrodite deity , or junction of the sexes , because it partakes of two natures . In a mysterious passage of the Yajur Veda , Brahma is spoken of ,

after his emanation from the golden egg , as experiencing fear at being alone in the universe ; he therefore willed the existence of another , and instantly became masculo-f eminine . The two sexes thus existing in one god were immediately , by another act of volition , divided in twain , and became man and wife . This tradition seems to have found its way into Greece ; for the Androgyne of Plato is but another version of this Oriental myth . If the Monad be added to an odd

iiumber , it makes it even , and if to an even number , it makes it odd . Hence it was called Jupiter , because it stands at the head of numbers , as Jupiter is at tho head of gods and men ; and also Vesta or Fire , because , like the point within a circle , it is seated in the midst of the world . It was also called the Throne of Jupiter , from the great power which the centre has in the universe , being able to restrain its general circular motion , as if the custody of the Maker of all things were constituted therein . "

The author further points out the meaning of the number , and what , at various times , and by various wise men , it was taken to symbolize . Thus , according to Hierocles the Pythagorean , the gods were likened to the Monad , " because there is one immutability and firmness of the virtues , which , it is reasonable to suppose , subsists transcendontly with the gods , and which imparts a never-failing

stability to their conceptions . " Among the same sect it was regarded as the symbol of love and friendship , of the oneness of mankind as a brotherhood , knit together by the same ties of love and Charity . Again , according to the same Hierocles already quoted , Ono symbolized the Platonic or Pythagorean doctrine of benevolence . This sage says : —

" Each of us is , as it wore , circumscribed by many concentric circles ; some of which are less , but others larger , and some comprehend , but others are comprehended , according to the different and unequal habitudes with respect to each other . For the first and most proximate circle is that which every one describes about his own mind as a centre , in which circle the body , and whatever is assumed

for the sake of the body , are comprehended . For this is nearly the smallest circle , and almost touches tho centre itself . The second from this , and which is at a greater distance from the centre , but comprehends the first circle , is that in which parents , brothers , wife , and children are arranged . The third circle from the centre is that which contains uncles and aunts , grandfathers and grandmothers , and the children of brothers and sisters . After this is tho circle

which comprehends the remaining relatives . Next to this is that which contains the common people , then that which comprehends those of the same tribe , afterwards that which contains the citizens ; and then two other circles follow , one being the circle of those that dwell in the vicinity of the city , and the other of those of the same province . But the outermost and greatest circle , and which comprehends all the other circles , is that of the whole human race . "

As to the importance of the number , we have several authorities given , but we content ourselves with the following extract : — " According to Euclid , in his second definition of the seventh book , numbers aro formed of many units ; but unity being indivisible , has no composition , nor is it a number , but the fountain and mother of alt numbers . Being tho cause of all numbers , they are formed by a

plurality of units . Thus 2 is twice 1 ; 3 is three units , & c . ; so that all numbers require the Monad , while it exists by itself without requiring any other . All which is to be considered of the First Cause ; for as one is no number , but the cause and beginning of number , ' so tho First Cause has no affini to creatures , but is tho cause and beginning of them ; they all stand in need of Him , and He requires

assistance from none . He is all in all , and all are included in Him in the most simple unity . The Jewish Rabbins agree that Ho is One , and there is no unity like His in the universe ; the nearest idea that we can form of Him is symbolised by the unit or the figure ono . " The Pythagoreans say , 'The Monad is the principle of all thin"S .

From the Monad came the indeterminate duad , as matters subjected to the cause , Monad ; from the Monad and indeterminate duad , Numbers ; from numbers , Points ; points , Lines ; from lines , Superfices ; from superfices , Solids ; from these solid Bodies , whose elements are four , Fire , Water , Air , Earth ; of all which , transmutated , and totally changed , the World consists . '"

These extracts will servo to show how elaborately , how minutely , Dr . Oliver has studied the meaning and symbolism of this number , or rather this " cause ol' all numbers , " but we need not follow him

Reviews.

through the few remaining pages of the chapter , which are only farther and confirmatory illustrations of the value of the Monad . Similarly with the other numbers , the exposition throughout is equally interesting—amusing , we may also say , in some places , and , in nearly all cases , equally lucid . We except the following on " tho Hexad : "—

" The sceptics used to amuse themselves by such arguments as these : If something be detracted from another , either an equal is detracted from an equal , a greater from a lesser , or a lesser from a greater . But none of these—therefore detraction is not possible . That detraction is not made by any of these ways is manifest . That which is detracted from another must be contained in it ; but an

equal is not contained in an equal , as six in six ; for that which con * taineth ought to be greater than that which is contained . Neither is the greater contained in the lesser , as six in five ; that were absurd . Neither is the lesser contained in the greater ; for if five were con . tained in six , by the same reason , in five will be contained four ; in four , three ; in three , two ; and in two , one . Thus six shall contain

five , fonr , three , two , and one , which being pnt together make fifteen , which must be contained in six , if it be granted that the lesser is contained in the greater . In like manner , in the fifteen which is thus contained in six , will be contained thirty-five ; and so by progression , infinite numbers ; but it is absurd to say that infinite numbers are contained in the number six ; therefore it is absurd to say that the lesser is contained in the greater . "

Now here we confess to being somewhat in a fog . We presume the whole of the arguments were employed by the sceptics , but there is nothing to indicate whether this is so or not , or whether the part of the passage beginning— " That detraction is not made , " to the end , is not Dr . Oliver's comment . Be this as it may , iu either case we join issue as to detraction not being made in either of these ways .

We hold that , mathematically , an equal is contained in an equal , and that it is contained exactly : and further , that five is contained in six , with a unit as remainder . We do not admit the theory that if six contains five , and five four , four three , & c , & c , therefore six contains fifteen—and , ultimately , that infinite numbers might bo contained in six . This is obviously a fallacy , but whether of the

Sceptics' or Dr . Oliver ' s own creation , we have no means of determining . It is impossible , of course , within the circumscribed limits at our command to give more than a very limited idea of the volume Suffice that each number is similarly treated as number one , that in nearly every case the treatment is as interesting , and this remark

especially applies to the Triad , the Tetrad and the Ennead , some singular properties of the first and last of which are well known , no doubt , to our readers . The few remarks we intend to add refer rather to the lnannnr of publication than to its contents . We think the publishers have exercised a wise discretion in leaving Dr . Oliver ' s text undisturbed : but we see no reason why the services of some

competent scholar should not have been called in in order to explain the abstruser portions of the work . We may fairly reckon that the majority of those who read this work will be Masons , but not all Masons arc sufficiently acquainted with Hebrew , Greek and Latin to understand the many passages and words in those languages with which the volume is interspersed . Had translations of these been added in

the shape of footnotes , the value of the work would have been greatly increased , and we trust , if a new edition be called for , this oversight will be remedied . Here is another reason why some classical scholar should have been invited to peruse the manuscript before it appeared in print . We are not sure the passages are correctly given . The quotation , at p . 52 , "Nequc enim tanta , & c , " is punctuated wrongly . It is impossible there should be a full stop after polytlicotes . As the

passage stands it has no meaning whatever , but remove the objectionable point , and we see its meaning at once , namely , " It was not the number of the Gods , worshipped by different peoples that was so considerable as the titles under which they were worshipped . This is only one , but it is a conspicuous case of an error having crept in for want of due oversight . But these aro points that can be remedied , and wo trust they will be removed in any future issue .

The Art of Swimming . By CAPTAIN WEBB , the Channel Swimmer . ( Edited by A . G . Payne . ) London : Ward , Lock & Tyler , Warwick House , Paternoster-row . NEXT week Captain Webb will be welcomed cordially into the ranks of Masonry , and his Essay on " The Art of Swimming , " apart from its intrinsic value , comes very opportunely , for it will enable our

readers to judge what manner of man it is who will so shortly become one of us . The story of his life is simply told . Wo said , last week , that brave men were men of kindness , and Captain Webb ' s account of his career , certainly confirms our dictum . He has worked bard and honourably in the career he chose when yet a boy of twelve . He has proved himself to be one of that class of

undaunted sailors , on whoso skill and courage England will have to rely chiefly in any danger that may threaten her . He possesses more than one testimonial to his unselfish daring , while the feat with which his name will ever bo associated , is , as we have previously remarked , unexampled in the history of all ages and peoples . There is , absolutely , no instance on record of a man having swum for nearly

twenty-two hours without a moment ' s respite ; and great things may bo expected of one who has done what no mortal man ever did before . The one feature that most strikes every one who reads the simple narration of Captain Webb ' s life , is his strict observance of tho truth . On no occasion did he ever allow himself to swerve even a hair ' s breadth into the crooked path of equivocation , much less into

that of wilful misrepresentation , and the man who can honestly show this is worthy the appreciation of the world . The Essay on Swimming is capitally written . The style is unaffected . The advice it contains is sound and practical . His illustrations of the respective merits of the breast-stroke , the side-stroke , and the overliaud-sfcrokc ; his instructions how to hold

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 5
  • You're on page6
  • 7
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy