Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Dec. 11, 1875
  • Page 4
  • REVIEWS.
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Dec. 11, 1875: Page 4

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Dec. 11, 1875
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article REVIEWS. Page 1 of 2
    Article REVIEWS. Page 1 of 2 →
Page 4

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Reviews.

REVIEWS .

All Books intended for Beview should be addressed to the Editor of The Freemason ' s Chronicle , 67 Barbican , B . C . 'The Discrepancies of Freemasonry . Examined during a week ' s gossip with the late celebrated Bro . Gilkes and other eminent Masons , on sundry obscure and difficult passages in tho Ordinary Lodge Lectures ,

which , although open questions in Grand Lodge , constitute a source of doubt and perplextty to the Craft . By the Rev . G . Oliver E . D ., Past M . P . S ., Grand Commander S G . I . G . 33 ° for England and Wales ; Past D . G . M . of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts ;

Past D . P , G . M . for Lincolnshire ; Honorary member of numerous Lodges and Literary Societies in every quarter of the Globe . Author of "The Eevelations of a Square , " "The Book of the Lodge , " " Historical Landmarks , " & o . With numerous diagrams . London : John Hogg and Co ., Paternoster-row . 1875 .

SECOND NOTICE . On Tuesday the discussion is resumed , and , having regard to tho progress the Order had made of late years , it is urged that improvements in tho ritual , without in the slightest degree distnrbing ancient landmarks , might be introduced . It is argued that during eighty

years of the last century , no less than seven or eight new rituals appeared , " each being an improvement on its predecessor , with a few exceptions , and each receiving tho sanction of the Grand Lodge . "

Since then , comparatively speaking , little has been done to improve the lectures . Here , again , a contrast is shown between tho conduct of the Order in tho United States and England , greatly to the advantage of tho former . We read : —

" The several Grand Lodges are engaged in an amicable contest , which shall carry out with the most beneficial effect the best interests of tho Order ; and hence we find nothing in Masonry , as it is practised there , to condemn , but much to commend . They do not waste their time in talking ; the debates upon all speculative questions being left

to the several committees—what yon call Boards , each of which has its own peculiar department . To one is entrusted the supervision of credentials ; to another the settlement of grievances ; to others the management of ways and means , of accounts , charters , and dispensations ; charity ; pay roll ; accounts of delegates ; foreign

correspondence ; unfinished business ; and private details . Tho Grand Lodges have merely to determine on their reports , which are usually found to bo drawn np with so much judgment and discrimination as not to be susceptible of any hostile opinion ; and hence tho members of Grand Lodges are seldom in collision with each other . "

In reply to a question , how it is " the brethren in the United States work better than ourselves ? " tho Skipper , who is responsible for tho foregoing exposition , explains : — "The Grand Lodges emulate the glory of rendering tho practice of Masonry worthy the patronage of serious and scientific men . Tho

establishment of a correct method of lecturing occupies much of their time . Eitnals are drawn up , examined by special committees , and published under sanction ; and lecturers are nominated to visit the private Lodges under each jurisdiction , for the purpose of preserving the strictest uniformity of rites , ceremonies , and mode of working . "

Tho other advantages which theCraft possesses in the United States , in the shape of an excellent and well-supported press , we alluded to separately last week . Wo need say nothing more here , but we may take this opportunity of pointing out a shortcoming we noticed in connection with the Pythagorean Triangle , a conspicuous illustration of which

occurs at p . 135 . In comparing Masonry in London and in Ohio , the advantage is greatly in favour of the latter . Now we expressed our opinion that the publishers had wisely decided to leave the text of Dr . Oliver untouched . At the same time we suggested it would have been better to have added explanatory foot notes , translations , & c ,

where desirable . In the present instance Ohio is taken as having a population of " about a million of sonls , or 200 , 000 male adults ; " and there are said to be " 100 Lodges and more than 2 , 000 Masons , or ono in every 100 males . " On the other hand , London with a far greater population has " only about half the number of Lodges , which contain

under 1 , 500 brethren . The note appended to this is as follows ; " This conversation took place many years ago . " Now at the expenditure of a few pence , and with a mere modicum of time devoted to statistical researches , " the publisher ' s note" might have given the present state of Masonry in Ohio and London ; and the reader

would then have known whether there was still the same difference in favour of Ohio now as when Dr . Oliver wrote this work , or whether the difference had been increased or lessened . The publishers , of course , know their own interests best , better , at all events , than we do , and if the trumpery

outlay that must have been incurred were worth saving , why , it was worth saving . H ; id we had the publication of this work entrusted to us , we should have left Dr . Oliver ' s work intact . At the same time we should have thought it due to his memory , and to his eminent literary services , to incur the expense of adding a few

explanatory notes wherever it seemed desirable . However , we quit this subject , and pass once again to the Discussions . The qualification questions , arranged in the form of Triads , is very ingenious . We iiext come to the derivation of the word " Lewis , " with which no

doubt , our readers are familiar . The French ceremony of adoption or applicat . on of a Lewis , which they derive from Louveteau or Loufton , is worth quoting . The Skipper is the spokesman , and he describes it thus :

" On the birth of a male child , if the father , being a Master Mason , is desirous that it should be formally adopted by the Lodpe , and received as a Lewis , he makes his request to tho Venerable—what

Reviews.

you call W . Master—by petition ; and an especial Lodge is convened for the purpose of carrying the wishes of a worthy brother into effect . The Lodge-room is profusely decorated with garlands of flowers , and the censers are replenished with fresh incense . At tho time appointed , the infant is brought by its nurse into the anteroom , and the Lodge is opened . After some preliminary

ceremonies , tho wardens , who act as sponsors for the child , are deputed , with the father , and some others , to introduce it , and when the procession arrives in the east , it halts under an arch of flowers , and tho W . M . demands their business . The S . W . replies , that they have ventured to introduce to his notice the newly-born son of a brother who is a Master Mason , and pray that it mav be adopted

by the Lodge as a Lewis , which includes the privilege of initiation at the age of eighteen years , of which , indeed , this is tho first stage . The Venerable then asks the child ' s name , and what Masonic appellation is intended to be conferred upon him ; to which inquiry tho S . W ., in the character of godfather , replies , by stating the surname preceded by a Christian name , which expresses some Masonic

virtue , as wisdom , fortiture , justice , & c , in the hope that it may influence the infant ' s future life and character . Descending the steps of the pedestal , he puts up a prayer for the welfare of the childtho inconse is kindled—the O . B . of an E . A . P . is tendered to the S . W . on behalf of the Lewis , and his Masonic name is publicly proclaimed , amidst the acclamations of the brethren . A minute is made of the

proceedings , and a circumstantial report , drawn up and signed in open Lodge by all the brethren , is presented to the father of tho Lewis , as a certificate of the child ' s inauguration . And the novice , thus purified , is bound in after-life to bear tho burden and heat of the day when his parent , borne down by age and infirmity , is incapable of providing for himself . "

Eeaders of ClaveVs Eistoire Pittoresque will remember the description given by that eminent writer as bearing out the above . The discussion then turns to the study of Masonry , in the course of which the author gives , at random , sundry Masonic aphorisms , and also insists on the establishment of apurely Masonic press . As we mado this latter question tho subject of a separate article last week , we

need not refer to it at any length . We may remark , however , it is insisted that a Masonic magazine " should contain nothing but Masonry , " and the very small amount of Masonic matter in the Freemason's Magazine , published in 1793 , and few years following , is assigned as the reason why its career was so brief . We have often ourselves wondered how a professedly Masonic periodical should

have contained so small a proportion of Masonry , and we feel that a review or magazine , appearing , it may be quarterly or monthly , should bo wholly Masonic ; but we see no objection to a weekly , like our own , or other journals wo could name , containing a modicum of profane news . Tho concluding subject which is dealt with on this second evening is Freemasonry and Templarism , for the brief

comments on which , we refer our readers to the book itself . On the third evening tho points discussed are , " Tho Cardinal Points . The North . Support of the Lodge . Charge of Sun Worship . Birth of Light . Free and Accepted . " It will not , of course , surprise those of our readers who are at all acquainted with Dr . Oliver ' s works to learn that tho learned Doctor introduces a

favonrite theory of his , and endeavours here , as he has done elsewhere , to treat Freemasonry as a purely Christian institution . What degree of success may be said to attend his efforts on this occasion we shall leave the reader to decide for himself . It is sufficient for us to say that his arguments display a considerable amonnt of skill and ingenuity . Many Masons , no doubt will demur to the learned

Doctor's view , but we see no objection to it from a Christian point of view , in so far at least as this . Every Christian believes that his religion will , in the fulness of time , be tho ono religion professed of all mankind . There will then be neither irreligion nor any differences of religion . Thus Masonry , being a morality based on religion , will rest on an essentially Christian basis . As it is , the most important requisite

in every candidate for admission into tho Order is , that ho have faith in one Omnipotent being , whom we designate as T . G . A . O . T . U ., but the fashion , so to speak , of that belief is left to the individual . Hence , wisely has it been ordained that all religious disputations shall be excluded from the Lodge . Thus tho floor of the Lodge is not only Holy Ground , on which none but men who believe in a God may

lawfully and conscientiousl y assemble , but a common gronnd for the assemblage of religions men , whatsoever the fashion of their creed may be . At page 200 , is another illustration of that oversight to which we have already more than once referred , in not having had the text of Dr . Oliver carefully supervised . By " The Charter of Colne , " wo

presume is meant the Charter of Cologne , or , if written as the Germans write it , " of Coin , " especially as the date given , 1535 , is the date of that spurious charter . We hardly imagine a scholar , as Dr . Oliver was , would have written " Colne " for " Cologne . " Had the revision of proofs been entrusted to some one who was a scholar , as well as a Mason , this egregious error would never have been passed unnoticed .

On Thursday the venue is changed , and the party assemble at the doctor ' s residence , and there discuss " Universality . Extent of the Lodge . Freemasonry , an open institution . Whether it be sectarian F Ground and covering of the Lodge . " To the Universality of Masonry , the learned author takes exception , and his arguments are very close and very subtle . The discussion on this point is very interesting , and is enlivened moreover , by sundry extracts from old and disused rituals .

As a quotation or two would fail to convey a just idea of the merits of the argument , we must leave our readers to judge for themselves . The remarks we intend offering on the two remaining discussions , we shall reserve till next week , as we fear wo have already exceeded the space at our command , and the last third of the volume is quite as full of important matter as the two-thirds we have thus far examined and commented on .

Kalender fur Freimaurer auf das Schaltjahr , 1876 . Bro . 0 . V AN

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1875-12-11, Page 4” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 19 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_11121875/page/4/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
VANITAS VANITATUM. Article 1
MASONIC PORTRAITS (No. 6). THE CRAFTSMAN. Article 1
PRICES AND THEIR FLUCTUATIONS. Article 2
THE HISTORICAL PICTURE. Article 2
GRAND LODGE OF IRELAND. Article 3
MASONIC FEMALE ORPHAN SCHOOL, DUBLIN. Article 3
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 3
REVIEWS. Article 4
MAGAZINES OF THE MONTH. Article 5
THE CLAIM OF MASONRY TO BE A MORAL AND SOCIAL INSTITUTION. Article 6
DECEMBER. Article 6
THE MASON'S SIGN. Article 7
THE DRAMA. Article 7
RAILWAY TRAFFIC RETURNS. Article 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
OUR WEEKLY BUDGET. Article 8
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 10
IRELAND. Article 11
EDINBURGH DISTRICT. Article 11
GLASGOW DISTRICT. Article 11
NOTICES OF MEETINGS. Article 11
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

3 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

4 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

4 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

3 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

3 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

5 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

2 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

6 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

14 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

14 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

14 Articles
Page 4

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

Reviews.

REVIEWS .

All Books intended for Beview should be addressed to the Editor of The Freemason ' s Chronicle , 67 Barbican , B . C . 'The Discrepancies of Freemasonry . Examined during a week ' s gossip with the late celebrated Bro . Gilkes and other eminent Masons , on sundry obscure and difficult passages in tho Ordinary Lodge Lectures ,

which , although open questions in Grand Lodge , constitute a source of doubt and perplextty to the Craft . By the Rev . G . Oliver E . D ., Past M . P . S ., Grand Commander S G . I . G . 33 ° for England and Wales ; Past D . G . M . of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts ;

Past D . P , G . M . for Lincolnshire ; Honorary member of numerous Lodges and Literary Societies in every quarter of the Globe . Author of "The Eevelations of a Square , " "The Book of the Lodge , " " Historical Landmarks , " & o . With numerous diagrams . London : John Hogg and Co ., Paternoster-row . 1875 .

SECOND NOTICE . On Tuesday the discussion is resumed , and , having regard to tho progress the Order had made of late years , it is urged that improvements in tho ritual , without in the slightest degree distnrbing ancient landmarks , might be introduced . It is argued that during eighty

years of the last century , no less than seven or eight new rituals appeared , " each being an improvement on its predecessor , with a few exceptions , and each receiving tho sanction of the Grand Lodge . "

Since then , comparatively speaking , little has been done to improve the lectures . Here , again , a contrast is shown between tho conduct of the Order in tho United States and England , greatly to the advantage of tho former . We read : —

" The several Grand Lodges are engaged in an amicable contest , which shall carry out with the most beneficial effect the best interests of tho Order ; and hence we find nothing in Masonry , as it is practised there , to condemn , but much to commend . They do not waste their time in talking ; the debates upon all speculative questions being left

to the several committees—what yon call Boards , each of which has its own peculiar department . To one is entrusted the supervision of credentials ; to another the settlement of grievances ; to others the management of ways and means , of accounts , charters , and dispensations ; charity ; pay roll ; accounts of delegates ; foreign

correspondence ; unfinished business ; and private details . Tho Grand Lodges have merely to determine on their reports , which are usually found to bo drawn np with so much judgment and discrimination as not to be susceptible of any hostile opinion ; and hence tho members of Grand Lodges are seldom in collision with each other . "

In reply to a question , how it is " the brethren in the United States work better than ourselves ? " tho Skipper , who is responsible for tho foregoing exposition , explains : — "The Grand Lodges emulate the glory of rendering tho practice of Masonry worthy the patronage of serious and scientific men . Tho

establishment of a correct method of lecturing occupies much of their time . Eitnals are drawn up , examined by special committees , and published under sanction ; and lecturers are nominated to visit the private Lodges under each jurisdiction , for the purpose of preserving the strictest uniformity of rites , ceremonies , and mode of working . "

Tho other advantages which theCraft possesses in the United States , in the shape of an excellent and well-supported press , we alluded to separately last week . Wo need say nothing more here , but we may take this opportunity of pointing out a shortcoming we noticed in connection with the Pythagorean Triangle , a conspicuous illustration of which

occurs at p . 135 . In comparing Masonry in London and in Ohio , the advantage is greatly in favour of the latter . Now we expressed our opinion that the publishers had wisely decided to leave the text of Dr . Oliver untouched . At the same time we suggested it would have been better to have added explanatory foot notes , translations , & c ,

where desirable . In the present instance Ohio is taken as having a population of " about a million of sonls , or 200 , 000 male adults ; " and there are said to be " 100 Lodges and more than 2 , 000 Masons , or ono in every 100 males . " On the other hand , London with a far greater population has " only about half the number of Lodges , which contain

under 1 , 500 brethren . The note appended to this is as follows ; " This conversation took place many years ago . " Now at the expenditure of a few pence , and with a mere modicum of time devoted to statistical researches , " the publisher ' s note" might have given the present state of Masonry in Ohio and London ; and the reader

would then have known whether there was still the same difference in favour of Ohio now as when Dr . Oliver wrote this work , or whether the difference had been increased or lessened . The publishers , of course , know their own interests best , better , at all events , than we do , and if the trumpery

outlay that must have been incurred were worth saving , why , it was worth saving . H ; id we had the publication of this work entrusted to us , we should have left Dr . Oliver ' s work intact . At the same time we should have thought it due to his memory , and to his eminent literary services , to incur the expense of adding a few

explanatory notes wherever it seemed desirable . However , we quit this subject , and pass once again to the Discussions . The qualification questions , arranged in the form of Triads , is very ingenious . We iiext come to the derivation of the word " Lewis , " with which no

doubt , our readers are familiar . The French ceremony of adoption or applicat . on of a Lewis , which they derive from Louveteau or Loufton , is worth quoting . The Skipper is the spokesman , and he describes it thus :

" On the birth of a male child , if the father , being a Master Mason , is desirous that it should be formally adopted by the Lodpe , and received as a Lewis , he makes his request to tho Venerable—what

Reviews.

you call W . Master—by petition ; and an especial Lodge is convened for the purpose of carrying the wishes of a worthy brother into effect . The Lodge-room is profusely decorated with garlands of flowers , and the censers are replenished with fresh incense . At tho time appointed , the infant is brought by its nurse into the anteroom , and the Lodge is opened . After some preliminary

ceremonies , tho wardens , who act as sponsors for the child , are deputed , with the father , and some others , to introduce it , and when the procession arrives in the east , it halts under an arch of flowers , and tho W . M . demands their business . The S . W . replies , that they have ventured to introduce to his notice the newly-born son of a brother who is a Master Mason , and pray that it mav be adopted

by the Lodge as a Lewis , which includes the privilege of initiation at the age of eighteen years , of which , indeed , this is tho first stage . The Venerable then asks the child ' s name , and what Masonic appellation is intended to be conferred upon him ; to which inquiry tho S . W ., in the character of godfather , replies , by stating the surname preceded by a Christian name , which expresses some Masonic

virtue , as wisdom , fortiture , justice , & c , in the hope that it may influence the infant ' s future life and character . Descending the steps of the pedestal , he puts up a prayer for the welfare of the childtho inconse is kindled—the O . B . of an E . A . P . is tendered to the S . W . on behalf of the Lewis , and his Masonic name is publicly proclaimed , amidst the acclamations of the brethren . A minute is made of the

proceedings , and a circumstantial report , drawn up and signed in open Lodge by all the brethren , is presented to the father of tho Lewis , as a certificate of the child ' s inauguration . And the novice , thus purified , is bound in after-life to bear tho burden and heat of the day when his parent , borne down by age and infirmity , is incapable of providing for himself . "

Eeaders of ClaveVs Eistoire Pittoresque will remember the description given by that eminent writer as bearing out the above . The discussion then turns to the study of Masonry , in the course of which the author gives , at random , sundry Masonic aphorisms , and also insists on the establishment of apurely Masonic press . As we mado this latter question tho subject of a separate article last week , we

need not refer to it at any length . We may remark , however , it is insisted that a Masonic magazine " should contain nothing but Masonry , " and the very small amount of Masonic matter in the Freemason's Magazine , published in 1793 , and few years following , is assigned as the reason why its career was so brief . We have often ourselves wondered how a professedly Masonic periodical should

have contained so small a proportion of Masonry , and we feel that a review or magazine , appearing , it may be quarterly or monthly , should bo wholly Masonic ; but we see no objection to a weekly , like our own , or other journals wo could name , containing a modicum of profane news . Tho concluding subject which is dealt with on this second evening is Freemasonry and Templarism , for the brief

comments on which , we refer our readers to the book itself . On the third evening tho points discussed are , " Tho Cardinal Points . The North . Support of the Lodge . Charge of Sun Worship . Birth of Light . Free and Accepted . " It will not , of course , surprise those of our readers who are at all acquainted with Dr . Oliver ' s works to learn that tho learned Doctor introduces a

favonrite theory of his , and endeavours here , as he has done elsewhere , to treat Freemasonry as a purely Christian institution . What degree of success may be said to attend his efforts on this occasion we shall leave the reader to decide for himself . It is sufficient for us to say that his arguments display a considerable amonnt of skill and ingenuity . Many Masons , no doubt will demur to the learned

Doctor's view , but we see no objection to it from a Christian point of view , in so far at least as this . Every Christian believes that his religion will , in the fulness of time , be tho ono religion professed of all mankind . There will then be neither irreligion nor any differences of religion . Thus Masonry , being a morality based on religion , will rest on an essentially Christian basis . As it is , the most important requisite

in every candidate for admission into tho Order is , that ho have faith in one Omnipotent being , whom we designate as T . G . A . O . T . U ., but the fashion , so to speak , of that belief is left to the individual . Hence , wisely has it been ordained that all religious disputations shall be excluded from the Lodge . Thus tho floor of the Lodge is not only Holy Ground , on which none but men who believe in a God may

lawfully and conscientiousl y assemble , but a common gronnd for the assemblage of religions men , whatsoever the fashion of their creed may be . At page 200 , is another illustration of that oversight to which we have already more than once referred , in not having had the text of Dr . Oliver carefully supervised . By " The Charter of Colne , " wo

presume is meant the Charter of Cologne , or , if written as the Germans write it , " of Coin , " especially as the date given , 1535 , is the date of that spurious charter . We hardly imagine a scholar , as Dr . Oliver was , would have written " Colne " for " Cologne . " Had the revision of proofs been entrusted to some one who was a scholar , as well as a Mason , this egregious error would never have been passed unnoticed .

On Thursday the venue is changed , and the party assemble at the doctor ' s residence , and there discuss " Universality . Extent of the Lodge . Freemasonry , an open institution . Whether it be sectarian F Ground and covering of the Lodge . " To the Universality of Masonry , the learned author takes exception , and his arguments are very close and very subtle . The discussion on this point is very interesting , and is enlivened moreover , by sundry extracts from old and disused rituals .

As a quotation or two would fail to convey a just idea of the merits of the argument , we must leave our readers to judge for themselves . The remarks we intend offering on the two remaining discussions , we shall reserve till next week , as we fear wo have already exceeded the space at our command , and the last third of the volume is quite as full of important matter as the two-thirds we have thus far examined and commented on .

Kalender fur Freimaurer auf das Schaltjahr , 1876 . Bro . 0 . V AN

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 3
  • You're on page4
  • 5
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy