Skip to main content
Museum of Freemasonry

Masonic Periodicals Online

  • Explore
  • Advanced Search
  • Home
  • Explore
  • The Freemason's Chronicle
  • Nov. 8, 1884
  • Page 9
Current:

The Freemason's Chronicle, Nov. 8, 1884: Page 9

  • Back to The Freemason's Chronicle, Nov. 8, 1884
  • Print image
  • Articles/Ads
    Article HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY IN MARYLAND. ← Page 2 of 3
    Article HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY IN MARYLAND. Page 2 of 3 →
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

History Of Freemasonry In Maryland.

Lodge minutes , and the biograhical sketches of eminent Brethren in the early days of Masonry , are eminently readable and of continuing- valne . Bro . Schnltz prefaces his history with a sketch of the formation of the Grand Lodge of England in 1717 ; an

account of the schism of 1738-40 , and division of the Craft for a time into " Moderns " and " Ancients ; " and a resume of the introduction of Masonry into America . Under this last head we are surprised to find certain errors of statement into which Bro . Schnltz shonld not

have fallen . For example , he repeats the old and oftexploded errors , that tho authority of Bro . Henry Price , Provincial Grand Master of New England , in 1734 " wns extended to cover all North America , " and that in the

same year " St . John ' s Grand Lodge , at Boston , " granted a warrant for " a Lodge in Philadelphia . " There is not an iota of reliable evidence existing to support either of these assertions , and even prominent Boston Brethren havo positively denied both of them . Bro . Schultz does

say : " Within the present year thero was discovered a Ledger of ' St . John ' s Lodge , ' Philadelphia , from Juno 24 . 1731 , to June 24 , 1738 , in which Bro . Franklin and others are charged with five Lodge days ( months ) cities , clearly showing that tho Lodge mast have been in existence as early as the latter part of 1730 . "

Bufc he adds to this : "It would appear that Philadelphia has established a claim to the first' Lodge meetings of Masons' held in this country , and Boston to that of the first ' Warranted' Lodges . Here our Brother is wrong again . So far as any

evidence remains , NO WARRANTS WERE ISSUED for subordinate Lodges in those early days . St . John ' s Lodge , No . 1 , of Boston , never had a Charter until it received one from the United Grand Lodge of Massachusetts in 1792 . Warrants or Deputations were granted only to Provincial Grand

Masters ; and the relative position of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts in this respect is as follows : There is indisputable evidence , the very best possible , that a Deputation was granted by the Grand Lodge of England , in 1730 , to Bro . Daniel Coxe , as Provincial Grand Master of

New York , New Jersey and Pennsylvania ; while there is no original and entirely trustworthy evidence that Brother Henry Price received a Deputation as Provincial Grand Master of New England in 1733 . The Grand Lods-e of England lias no entry of the fact anywhere on its records of

thafc date , nor in the years immediately following , nor has it any mention whatever at that era of Bro . Henry Price ; and all thafc is relied upon to prove the allegation is an alleged copy of the Deputation , made 1751 , eighteen years after the event , and the naked assertions of Bro . Price

himself . In other words , the original of this alleged Deputation nowhere exists , nor any contemporaneous official record of or reference to it , either in America or in England ; nor does a contemporaneous copy of it exist , bnt only a copy long afterwards made by Bro . Charles Pelham

in 1751 or 1752 . In other words it is the shadow of a shade . Bro . Price often asserted , some thirty years after 1733 , to the Grand Lodge officials in London , that he had been appointed Provincial Grand Master in 1733 , but he never produced his Deputation therefor , nor any

enlargement thereof , and it was only upon the strength of his persistent aud unsupported asseverations that he finally obtained recognition , and that many years after fche alleged

event itself . This all a matter of recorded history , contained in tbe Proceedings of tbe Grand Lodge of Massachusetts , and it speaks for itself . It will thus be seen that the reverse of Bro . Scbultz ' s statement is true :

Freemasonry in PENNSYLVANIA was lav fully warranted in 1730 by an undisputed Deputation to Bro . Daniel Coxe , while Freemasonry in MASSACHUSETTS in 1733 had no warrant , so far as officially appears , unless we accept the assertions of Bro . Henry Price , supported by the alleged copy of his

alleged Deputation made eighteen years after its granting , and contained in a record ( that of St . John ' s Lodge , Boston , written up in 1751-2 ) that has been proven , as to its

early allegations , to be full of errors . Bro . Schnltz should either not have gone into these matters , or else carefully studied the subject in the light of all the officially recorded facts .

The earliest Lodge in Maryland , according to the records of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts , was authorised in 1750 , by Bro . Thomas Oxnard , Provincial Grand Master of North America . None of its records are known to be in existence . In 1759 there was a Lodge ab Leonardtown ,

History Of Freemasonry In Maryland.

possibly a " branch , " it is stated , of that held at Annapolis . Bro . Schnltz says : — " Tin ; records of tho Leoiiaidtown Lodge , with one exceptionthose of St . John's Lodge , Boston—are the oldest original Lodge proeeedings discovered in this country . "

These minutes , however , extend over a period of only four years and a half , the Lodge about then ceasing to exist , while we havo in Philadelphia , Lodge No . 3 , still actively at work and prosperous , the minutes of

which are - perfect and complete from 3 n ? December 17 ( 17 to the present time . The lately discovered Ledger of St . John ' s Lodge , Philadel phia , 1731-8 also long antedates them .

In those days the brethren were fond of attending divine service on St . John ' s Day , 24 th June , and in the evening thereafter , a ball . For example , in the minutes of 1759 we read : — " Being ass nhlod at the Court House , after hearing a Polite ,

Acurate and most Edyfying discourse , delivered by onr Rev'd Brother John MoI'lu-rson , wo returned to the Lodge Boom . In the evening was a Goiiteel Ball , at the opening of whioh was sung by the Members of the Lodge , Locked in a Circle , the Entered Apprentice ' s

Song . In tho morning the members as » ain repaired to the Lodge Room , when it wns ordered that the money due to the Lodge be applied towards the expenses of the Ball , and what may remain undischarged to be collected from the members . "

In June 1761 there was " no clergyman to perform divino service" for this Lodge , nevertheless , "it was ordered that the clerk of the parish read the Evening

Service , " after which they went to the ball . In December 1761 they had another merry making , when " fche ball was opened by Bro . Plater , aud the evening concluded with great mirth and decency . "

Under date 3 rd November 1762 , we read , " The Secre . tary presents to the Lodge a petition signed by Archd . Campbell , with a certificate of his being made a Mason at

the Royal Arch Lodge at Glasgow . " The last entry on the minutes of the Leonardtown Lodgo is of date 27 th December 1764 . It is not known by what authority this Lodge was warranted .

In 1765 a Lodge was chartered at Joppa , Baltimore county , by Lord Blaney , Grand Master of England ( " the Ancients" ) . Among its regulations was the following , aimed afc " Modern " Masons : —

" That none who hath been admitted in any Modern Lodge shall be ndmitted as a member of this Lodge without taking the respective Obligations Peculiar to Ancient Masons . "

This , too , is significant : — " That the Master ' s Lodge begins on each Communication at 10 o ' clock , the Crafts afc 12 o'clock , and E . P . at 3 o ' clock , whioh shall be and is hereby Ruled to be the Closing of the Communication .

"That no Follow of fche Craft shall be raited to the Sublime Degree of M . M . until he passes an Examination , and is found Otpible thereof by a Committee of at least Three M . M ., to be appointed for that purpose , and if found on the said Examination Rn * ty in the Former parts must Wait until Brightened bxj further experience before he can be Raised . "

On 27 fch December 1765 the Lodge again attended Divine Service and Sermon . Afterwards"Then at the Church door a glass of Wine and Cake to the Brethren by the Treasurer and Deacons , then any that pleased to Accept .

" Then marched ns before , backed to the Lodge . At Entering the door the Entered Apprentice ' s Song , and after Adjournment dined . Ball following , Consisting Chiefly of Masons , Masons' Wives and Buirns . " Bro . Schultz says , " Lodge chests in those times had .

three locks , with a distinct key for each lock . One of these were kept by the W . M ., one by the S . W ., and one by the J . W . In these chests the charter , jewels , & c , of the Lodge were kept , and in some old Lodges the Bye-laws provided that these chests should not be opened except when these three Officers ' were present and agreed . ' "

Novv-a days such a regulation would insure fche punctual attendance of the Officers , or else , as then , the nonopening of the Lod ' j-e . The Provincial Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania may be said to have been the Mother Lodge of fche Craft in

Maryland . Prior to 1782 it chartered nine Lodges in Maryland , viz .: Nos . 6 , 7 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 27 , 29 , 34 and 37 . No . ' l 5 , at Baltimore , chartered by the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania in 1770 , is now Washington Lodge , No . 3 , and the oldest

Lo'lge in the State . Among its Bye-laws were the following : — " Any Brother who shall enter the Lodge without Clean Linen and Decent Clothing , to be reprimandcl from the Chair , and ordered to withdraw for that Night .

“The Freemason's Chronicle: 1884-11-08, Page 9” Masonic Periodicals Online, Library and Museum of Freemasonry, 10 July 2025, django:8000/periodicals/fcn/issues/fcn_08111884/page/9/.
  • List
  • Grid
Title Category Page
THE ENGLISH RITE OF FREEMASONRY. Article 1
MASONIC DEGREE PEDDLERS. Article 2
DOUGLAS, ISLE OF MAN. Article 3
CORRESPONDENCE. Article 5
INSTALLATION MEETINGS, &c. Article 6
Untitled Ad 7
THE FIFTEEN SECTIONS Article 7
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Ad 8
Untitled Article 8
HISTORY OF FREEMASONRY IN MARYLAND. Article 8
MARK MASONRY. Article 10
Obituary. Article 10
ROYAL ARCH. Article 11
Old Warrants(A). Article 11
DIARY FOR THE WEEK. Article 12
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 14
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 15
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Untitled Ad 16
Page 1

Page 1

2 Articles
Page 2

Page 2

3 Articles
Page 3

Page 3

2 Articles
Page 4

Page 4

2 Articles
Page 5

Page 5

3 Articles
Page 6

Page 6

2 Articles
Page 7

Page 7

4 Articles
Page 8

Page 8

9 Articles
Page 9

Page 9

2 Articles
Page 10

Page 10

4 Articles
Page 11

Page 11

2 Articles
Page 12

Page 12

2 Articles
Page 13

Page 13

2 Articles
Page 14

Page 14

5 Articles
Page 15

Page 15

11 Articles
Page 16

Page 16

13 Articles
Page 9

Note: This text has been automatically extracted via Optical Character Recognition (OCR) software.

History Of Freemasonry In Maryland.

Lodge minutes , and the biograhical sketches of eminent Brethren in the early days of Masonry , are eminently readable and of continuing- valne . Bro . Schnltz prefaces his history with a sketch of the formation of the Grand Lodge of England in 1717 ; an

account of the schism of 1738-40 , and division of the Craft for a time into " Moderns " and " Ancients ; " and a resume of the introduction of Masonry into America . Under this last head we are surprised to find certain errors of statement into which Bro . Schnltz shonld not

have fallen . For example , he repeats the old and oftexploded errors , that tho authority of Bro . Henry Price , Provincial Grand Master of New England , in 1734 " wns extended to cover all North America , " and that in the

same year " St . John ' s Grand Lodge , at Boston , " granted a warrant for " a Lodge in Philadelphia . " There is not an iota of reliable evidence existing to support either of these assertions , and even prominent Boston Brethren havo positively denied both of them . Bro . Schultz does

say : " Within the present year thero was discovered a Ledger of ' St . John ' s Lodge , ' Philadelphia , from Juno 24 . 1731 , to June 24 , 1738 , in which Bro . Franklin and others are charged with five Lodge days ( months ) cities , clearly showing that tho Lodge mast have been in existence as early as the latter part of 1730 . "

Bufc he adds to this : "It would appear that Philadelphia has established a claim to the first' Lodge meetings of Masons' held in this country , and Boston to that of the first ' Warranted' Lodges . Here our Brother is wrong again . So far as any

evidence remains , NO WARRANTS WERE ISSUED for subordinate Lodges in those early days . St . John ' s Lodge , No . 1 , of Boston , never had a Charter until it received one from the United Grand Lodge of Massachusetts in 1792 . Warrants or Deputations were granted only to Provincial Grand

Masters ; and the relative position of Pennsylvania and Massachusetts in this respect is as follows : There is indisputable evidence , the very best possible , that a Deputation was granted by the Grand Lodge of England , in 1730 , to Bro . Daniel Coxe , as Provincial Grand Master of

New York , New Jersey and Pennsylvania ; while there is no original and entirely trustworthy evidence that Brother Henry Price received a Deputation as Provincial Grand Master of New England in 1733 . The Grand Lods-e of England lias no entry of the fact anywhere on its records of

thafc date , nor in the years immediately following , nor has it any mention whatever at that era of Bro . Henry Price ; and all thafc is relied upon to prove the allegation is an alleged copy of the Deputation , made 1751 , eighteen years after the event , and the naked assertions of Bro . Price

himself . In other words , the original of this alleged Deputation nowhere exists , nor any contemporaneous official record of or reference to it , either in America or in England ; nor does a contemporaneous copy of it exist , bnt only a copy long afterwards made by Bro . Charles Pelham

in 1751 or 1752 . In other words it is the shadow of a shade . Bro . Price often asserted , some thirty years after 1733 , to the Grand Lodge officials in London , that he had been appointed Provincial Grand Master in 1733 , but he never produced his Deputation therefor , nor any

enlargement thereof , and it was only upon the strength of his persistent aud unsupported asseverations that he finally obtained recognition , and that many years after fche alleged

event itself . This all a matter of recorded history , contained in tbe Proceedings of tbe Grand Lodge of Massachusetts , and it speaks for itself . It will thus be seen that the reverse of Bro . Scbultz ' s statement is true :

Freemasonry in PENNSYLVANIA was lav fully warranted in 1730 by an undisputed Deputation to Bro . Daniel Coxe , while Freemasonry in MASSACHUSETTS in 1733 had no warrant , so far as officially appears , unless we accept the assertions of Bro . Henry Price , supported by the alleged copy of his

alleged Deputation made eighteen years after its granting , and contained in a record ( that of St . John ' s Lodge , Boston , written up in 1751-2 ) that has been proven , as to its

early allegations , to be full of errors . Bro . Schnltz should either not have gone into these matters , or else carefully studied the subject in the light of all the officially recorded facts .

The earliest Lodge in Maryland , according to the records of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts , was authorised in 1750 , by Bro . Thomas Oxnard , Provincial Grand Master of North America . None of its records are known to be in existence . In 1759 there was a Lodge ab Leonardtown ,

History Of Freemasonry In Maryland.

possibly a " branch , " it is stated , of that held at Annapolis . Bro . Schnltz says : — " Tin ; records of tho Leoiiaidtown Lodge , with one exceptionthose of St . John's Lodge , Boston—are the oldest original Lodge proeeedings discovered in this country . "

These minutes , however , extend over a period of only four years and a half , the Lodge about then ceasing to exist , while we havo in Philadelphia , Lodge No . 3 , still actively at work and prosperous , the minutes of

which are - perfect and complete from 3 n ? December 17 ( 17 to the present time . The lately discovered Ledger of St . John ' s Lodge , Philadel phia , 1731-8 also long antedates them .

In those days the brethren were fond of attending divine service on St . John ' s Day , 24 th June , and in the evening thereafter , a ball . For example , in the minutes of 1759 we read : — " Being ass nhlod at the Court House , after hearing a Polite ,

Acurate and most Edyfying discourse , delivered by onr Rev'd Brother John MoI'lu-rson , wo returned to the Lodge Boom . In the evening was a Goiiteel Ball , at the opening of whioh was sung by the Members of the Lodge , Locked in a Circle , the Entered Apprentice ' s

Song . In tho morning the members as » ain repaired to the Lodge Room , when it wns ordered that the money due to the Lodge be applied towards the expenses of the Ball , and what may remain undischarged to be collected from the members . "

In June 1761 there was " no clergyman to perform divino service" for this Lodge , nevertheless , "it was ordered that the clerk of the parish read the Evening

Service , " after which they went to the ball . In December 1761 they had another merry making , when " fche ball was opened by Bro . Plater , aud the evening concluded with great mirth and decency . "

Under date 3 rd November 1762 , we read , " The Secre . tary presents to the Lodge a petition signed by Archd . Campbell , with a certificate of his being made a Mason at

the Royal Arch Lodge at Glasgow . " The last entry on the minutes of the Leonardtown Lodgo is of date 27 th December 1764 . It is not known by what authority this Lodge was warranted .

In 1765 a Lodge was chartered at Joppa , Baltimore county , by Lord Blaney , Grand Master of England ( " the Ancients" ) . Among its regulations was the following , aimed afc " Modern " Masons : —

" That none who hath been admitted in any Modern Lodge shall be ndmitted as a member of this Lodge without taking the respective Obligations Peculiar to Ancient Masons . "

This , too , is significant : — " That the Master ' s Lodge begins on each Communication at 10 o ' clock , the Crafts afc 12 o'clock , and E . P . at 3 o ' clock , whioh shall be and is hereby Ruled to be the Closing of the Communication .

"That no Follow of fche Craft shall be raited to the Sublime Degree of M . M . until he passes an Examination , and is found Otpible thereof by a Committee of at least Three M . M ., to be appointed for that purpose , and if found on the said Examination Rn * ty in the Former parts must Wait until Brightened bxj further experience before he can be Raised . "

On 27 fch December 1765 the Lodge again attended Divine Service and Sermon . Afterwards"Then at the Church door a glass of Wine and Cake to the Brethren by the Treasurer and Deacons , then any that pleased to Accept .

" Then marched ns before , backed to the Lodge . At Entering the door the Entered Apprentice ' s Song , and after Adjournment dined . Ball following , Consisting Chiefly of Masons , Masons' Wives and Buirns . " Bro . Schultz says , " Lodge chests in those times had .

three locks , with a distinct key for each lock . One of these were kept by the W . M ., one by the S . W ., and one by the J . W . In these chests the charter , jewels , & c , of the Lodge were kept , and in some old Lodges the Bye-laws provided that these chests should not be opened except when these three Officers ' were present and agreed . ' "

Novv-a days such a regulation would insure fche punctual attendance of the Officers , or else , as then , the nonopening of the Lod ' j-e . The Provincial Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania may be said to have been the Mother Lodge of fche Craft in

Maryland . Prior to 1782 it chartered nine Lodges in Maryland , viz .: Nos . 6 , 7 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 27 , 29 , 34 and 37 . No . ' l 5 , at Baltimore , chartered by the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania in 1770 , is now Washington Lodge , No . 3 , and the oldest

Lo'lge in the State . Among its Bye-laws were the following : — " Any Brother who shall enter the Lodge without Clean Linen and Decent Clothing , to be reprimandcl from the Chair , and ordered to withdraw for that Night .

  • Prev page
  • 1
  • 8
  • You're on page9
  • 10
  • 16
  • Next page
  • Accredited Museum Designated Outstanding Collection
  • LIBRARY AND MUSEUM CHARITABLE TRUST OF THE UNITED GRAND LODGE OF ENGLAND REGISTERED CHARITY NUMBER 1058497 / ALL RIGHTS RESERVED © 2025

  • Accessibility statement

  • Designed, developed, and maintained by King's Digital Lab

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & cookie policy